جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

There is much debate revolving about the issue weather the government has to provide funding for arts or it should spend money on public health and education. In my opinion, public health and education require more budget than arts. However, the value of arts in the society is not covered foe people. I defense my assumption by the following reasons and examples. The primary reason is related to enough money on public health and educational systems, provides suitable facilities and equipment for these domains. For example, in the emergency occasions, these facilities will be come in handy and convenient. So people can tackle a lot of problems. The second reason is about the priority of life. Everybody concedes that some qualification of life are initial and primary. The first items which come to the people's mind are about health and education. Without being healthy , people would not be able to carry out their tasks and neither they look for their favorite careers. Furthermore, education can dedicated people in the high ranked levels of a society. Moreover, it can absorb the managers' attraction wanting to employee the graduated students. Hence, people coherence the public health and education more essential than arts. On the other hand ,the art fields might be practical for enhancing the quality of human being's lives. Despite of considering the necessity of arts , the health and education are more worthy . In conclusion, the government should pay more attention on the health and education instead of arts due to the importance of them which I had explained before.

Go to top