Mondays

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. The question of whether the punishments of each crime must be fixed or not is one of the most controversial issues of the modern era. Some people believe that if there is a rule as a punishment, it must be implemented for everyone equally, while the others feel that there are always some other aspects which must be put taken into consideration while the final decision is being mademaking. In this essay I will explore both points of view and then state my opinion in general. On one hand, many people feel strongly that having flexible laws for different criminals not only can (arise) promote spread chaos, but also can increase the level of injustice among the society. In other words, when an offender believes that there is a loophole for escaping from the condemnation by convincing judges through various excuses, he will no longer be deterred from the consequences, hence the augmentation significant rise inof crimes. In addition, as long as the judge has the power of changing the penalty, the bribery is undeniable, in this way, just the inferior ones petty pertatrators/delinquents who cannot afford the price would be subjected to heavy penalties. On the other hand, the other group think that when a judge wants to make a decision about an accused person, he must pay careful attention to all his circumstances while he was committing the mentioned crimes. For example, a murder which is caused from self-defense has nothing to do with a serial killer,. therefore, their situations and as a result their penalties must not be comparable. At last, in my opinion, the main conclusion to be drawn from this discussion is that although outwardly many crimes are the same, but there must be a minimum and maximum penalty for each type of them, and of course a court council to prevent arbitrary decisions and run a justice simultaneously.