جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Every government’s didactic programs aim to raise youths’ ’s skills, talents, interests and capability to the best of their own. This can be decided only by paying more attention to nowadays today’s needs of generations. This argument specially focuses on one of the greatest country countries in the world, where which I do not have any clear clue about, since I was born and raised in a third-world country. My only piece of information is based on series and movies. So I decided to elaborate what are negative and positive aspects there are in a public education system. To begin with, the most rational justification is that a perfect system needs to be flexible. Each youth young person has different needs, characteristics and talents. Every curriculum must be like a wheel which can be easily stir steered in any usable direction. It must give each teacher enough freedom to decide what to teach. So many unbelievable benefits can be reaped of this kind of method. Owing to the experience of structureran educator, and since they are in on the front-line of the education system, giving them the power of making down-to-earth decisions, will cover many flaws of each teaching system. On the other hand, this method may be faced with a dilemma. If an educator in a system is dated, he or she have has not been trained effectively, this in turn, comes with irreversible damages. Simply put, there are no industries where they have manufactured their products in the same ways as 100 years ago. This can be generalized to all aspectsof society. Public schools’ teachers must be educated each year with new methods and up-to-date material of psychology. It will guide them to decide perfectly whenever they have to teach in a class. Another compelling argument about a system is how much modern technology is included in it. The advent of modern life, build uphas brought along possibilities other skills which were did not exist in decades before. As I read the critic’s critics’ reviews about USA’s currenttoday's USA public education system, it has not upgraded. So eventually it will stop working. It is missing the opportunity to bring technology into mainstream public schools. The last but not the least, as the USA is a country which now belongs to different walks of life, people with diverse backgrounds, the new educational structure must contain manifold aspects of different cultures. Nowadays, generations must learn to live together and reverence each others. It must be reflected in the curriculum. This should be the way that how we raise our next generations. To sum up, considering the points discussed above, if the public education system of USA does not meet themtoday’s educational requirements, it faces a big problem. It must be changed from the root. However, the outcomes of science, economy and industry of USA shows different results. I have doubts about the accuracy of this arguments. I maintain with by changing some out-of-date aspects of didactic curriculum, it achieves its nations’ ambitiousambitions.

Go to top