Fridays

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many countries are experiencing population growth and need more homes. Should these new homes be constructed in existing cities or should new towns be built in the countryside? Nowadays, population growth in many countries is basic problem for the governments. More people need more place to live, more home, more facilities and more infrastructures. Hence the governments must create new living zone in big cities to cover these demands. In my opinion, we cannot develop existing cities while we do not think about their urban infrastructures. These substructures have high priority for constructing new homes for new people, if we have not cover those, people will have difficulties more and more. In these cases, there are not the differences between develop the existing cities or built new town. The governments must have pay attention to create best situation in both cases for their peoples. For example, on Iran, the governments makes decision for create new living zone in all crowded cities of the country to cover the growth of population that called “Maskan Mehr”. In most of cities, responsible of these idea, never forecast infrastructures and just try to build more homes for peoples without think about their comforts. For example, in all of them there is lack of schools, medical center, social services and shopping center. Most of them have a long distance with city center. Because of these restrictions, most of the residences residents are dissatisfied. Anyway, I think we could develop cities just when we produce an urban master plan. We must think for the future generations, we should not see today. Looking to the future, we must create new zones with a master plan which can guarantee future life, future development and future construction. Without them we can bring the cities to ruins.