جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that there should be fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Although some people surmise that circumstances should be considered by lawmakers to define punishments, others believe that fixed punishments for each type of crime would be well-judged. First, these two opinions will be investigated through this essay and then my point of view will be outlined. A group of people opine that specific punishment should be examined by lawmakers for an individual crime. If this consideration was helpful, governments with strict laws would have no problem. While, countries such as Saudi Arabia with severe disciplines to bring people under their control have encountered many troubles. Fixed punishments not only did not reduce the crime rates in these countries, but also motivated people to protest against inappropriately made laws. On the other hand, others suppose that conditions/circumstances should be taken into account for penalty determination. For instance, when someone encounters a situation where they have which has to defend themselves himself/herself and that case ends up in to murder, this happening assumes as self-defense and death penalty is not fair for this person. These this group believes that a mentally ill person who commits a crime should be punished considering hishim/her illness. Moreover, Intolerable and poor conditions turn people into an offender. Provideding with a proper condition, these people could be useful for their community. In my estimation, these are some innocents innocent people who commit illegal action (without malice aforethought)/unintentionally. Although they are lawbreakers, they should be judged justly by considering all motivations and convincing factors that changed that person into a wrong doer. To conclude, judges should penalize offenders regarding persuasive terms and they should not decide based on prejudgment about the guilty of an offence. Flexibility and a sense of justice help them to establish punishments squarely.

Go to top