Fridays

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Page 190 of Saadaat Jozveh: Some businesses now say that no one can smoke cigarettes in any of their offices. Some governments have banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer. It is an abominable truth that smoking has become an unhealthy habit among youths and adults nowadays. Although, considered a soft drug abuse, smoking may lead people to tons of respiratory diseases and it plays absolutely a major part in lung cancer based on scientific researches. As a result, I totally agree with placing some strict restrictions on smoking, avoiding preventing non-smokers suffering from the unhealthy lifestyle choices of the others. Although, the destructive effects of smoking are obvious, complaints are always arising from a few chain-smokers that smoke-free zones have taken away their freedom. In this case, if giving the nicotine addicts the allowance of smoking in public places were could have been possible, would it not threaten others' freedom likewise? In other words, not only does smoking cause health issues for smokers themselves, but it affects also the second-hand smokers as well. Moreover, observing a smoker's gesture posture might lead adolescents and juveniles to develop a sudden appreciation for this toxic habit. Another reason why we should limit the locations of this activity is that passive smoking is as poisonous as smoking itself. By this which I mean, I believe that the inhalation of tobacco smoke from a nearby cigarettes may increase the risk risks of getting a respiratory disease. Nevertheless, imposing restrictions on smoking does not help the issue to a great extent, since second-hand smokers frequently live with their smoking partners in the same environments. To sum up, not letting people smoke everywhere they desire somehow takes away smokers' freedom. By the same token, the violation of none-smokers' freedom by the tobacco use is irrational. However, in my view the latter is a much more severe violation of human rights. Dear Sir/Madam, I am particularly interested in the course which is being offered at your college. I noticed that the enrollment is available just for those who have studied computing at a college or university. Unfortunately, I have not studied computing at college, yet computer programming is my passion and I always buy computer magazines to learn just a little bit further and update my knowledge. I am writing to ask if you could make an exception to your course enrollment requirements based on my background level of computing. I have taught myself major computer languages including FORTRAN, HTTPS, C++, C# and QBasic. Currently I design web pages and this has been my job over the past three years. I am available for an interview, as well as a placement test so that I can demonstrate both my knowledge and skills. I hope you consider my request favorably. Yours faithfully. Saeed Shokravi