جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? As a consequence of urbanization most of the people are too busy with their daily tasks. Thus, because of lack of time they prefer to consume fast food rather than traditional and healthy ones food. There is a view/an idea that the government can impose higher taxes to prevent from consumption of junk food. However, this is not and an efficient method. I believe that there are several ways to control the consumption of fast food. The Government can provide some facilities to urge people to take for taking a healthy meals. By this, I mean the government can arrange a free monthly ceremony in outdoor places and serve traditional food and clarify the benefits of healthy food through by some especial speeches. Also, it this is a great idea to exploit endorsement in media for instance, in commercial programs and between the gap of some specific movies. In addition, using the eye‐catching methods attracts the ordinary people to take more fruits and traditional food by setting up/erecting some billboards around the cities. Moreover, children should be educated from an early age by their parents and after that in the schools about the advantages of healthy food and disadvantages of junk food. Besides, it would be Useful/great if each company and organization provided the fresh fruits for their employees. Likewise, government and private sector should cooperate with each other for holding an exhibition at least annually and advertising the benefits of vegetables and healthy food and explain the drawbacks of fast food. It is good to mention that participation in awareness campaigns would change the view and bad habits of consumption too much fast food. Furthermore, a large number of people are working in sausage manufacturing companies (sausage's manufacturing company) as an experts, workers employee and as a labor and even there are a huge number of people who are working in restaurants. If the government imposes a higher tax, some manufacturing companies company (will be faced with) will face to bankruptcy, unemployment people and corruption. Unfortunately, many people cannot afford the high cost of healthy food, so the poverty will expand to all around the country. As far as I am concerned, increasing the tax of fast food does not have an efficient impact on preventing to prevent decreasing the consumption of junk food. The government should motivate people by advertising, teaching and propaganda to consume more healthy food.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people regard work as the most important thing in life and have little interest in anything else. Other people are more enthusiastic about their hobbies and leisure interests than their job. Discuss both these attitudes and give your opinion. People fall into two categories with respect to their views on their jobs. Some pay too much attention to their career, and others, however, hold the opposite view. These different views result in different outcomes in their success at work and health conditions. In this essay, the pros and cons of these attitudes will be discussed in detail. Workaholics are undoubtedly more successful in their jobs. They devote much of their time at the workplace. They often work until midnight, and even spend their lunchbreak at their offices, doing their tasks. Thus, they often are aware of ins and outs of their jobs and because of this, they further in their career in short term. Although this effort brings them more money in comparison comparsion to their colleagues, they do not enjoy a healthy life as they do not indulge themselves in recreational activities at all. Because of this, they often suffer from emotional disease that in some cases may lead to deep depression and mental disorders which could have a dire consequences on their career. In contrast, those who much of their life is spent on hobbies and leisure pursuits persuits enjoy a happier life. These people spend much of their time in recreational activities such as visiting their peers, watching the latest movies and working out at fitness clubs. Because of this, they are often in a good mood and they enjoy healthier life both mentally and physically. Despite of this healthy life, they do are not promoted in their career and earn less money as they do not put their mind in their career. Therefore, more than other people, they are faced with economical problems in their life. As a result, they cannot can not be happy all the time. Overall, I think on balance that neither not fully concentration on work nor indulging in leisure activities in life leads to human well‐being. In other words, the answer lies in striking a putting balance between career and hobbies in life as ,in this way, one can benefit from both promotion in career and a healthy lifestyle.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that money is the most important factor for achieving happiness. However, others believe that happiness has nothing to do with money. Do you agree or disagree? Nowadays having a large amount of money has become a priority for many people seeking to ensure a constant and long‐term cheerful life. However, another group of people point out that the real peaceful life is much more than just earning enormous amounts of money. The former group consider wealth the best way to fulfill the mankind requirements and the latter look for spiritual things to reach the peace. To begin with, achieving the highest level of accessibility to all kinds of life facilitators, many people work more and more to earn the money which their dreams involve. That is to say, if we have enough purchaseing power to provide ourselves with all demanded equipment for our objectives, we will not only will feel happy, but also we can rely on the insurance which our bank account offers us to a rapidly improving future. For instance, the more you have money, the greater university you can attend which in turn can be conducive to current happy times as well as a brighter future. In stark contrast, some people argue that thinking about the world and its leisure in this materialistic view cannot be a wholly positive ideology and maybe leads us to the wrong way. In other words, with many people working for economic goals throughout their lives, the meaningful aspects of the life has have become forgotten. They point out that religious values and love have a direct correlation with our sense of happiness. To make an example, by and large all of us have read or heard a lot of stories about people who had lived in a wealthy family before they face either love or a mysterious spiritual event. To put it in a nutshell, although being certain ensure about comfortable life economically can be a common dream, especially among young people, from my point of view, our interior aspects of life can play a part in our life satisfaction too.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

A person's worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old‐fashioned values, such as honor, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Along with the development of human civilization we are moving away from some of the values namely, tenderness, compassion and amiability. By this I mean, nowadays people tend to someone who has a specific position in society and more assets rather than the ordinary people with gentility. The question is which of them is are superior to other to measures measure of a person's worthiness.? There is an idea that wealthy people deserve to be praised and respected by the people since they have tried more to achieve their goals and gain exclusive status. In some way, this is a real fact. however, most of the ordinary people are creating so many ways to reach a the high social position and they are hard‐working as well. Despite of so many efforts, they are not that much successful about those especial points. There is so much destructive effect if the people admire each other by their possessions., they will lose their original personality. Moreover, they will face lots of problems like likely, depression and anxiety. They could not find anybody to respect and support them just because of the humanitarian sense. In consequence, of that they are prone to will commit a crime and also, they might even attempted murder or and suicide. Furthermore, some values such as, affection and mercy would not be old‐fashioned. Just there is a point that the government and some organizations should expand the effect of kindness in every level of the society for example, poor people, ordinary people, CEOs and even the president and the King. Through By some advertising and some kind of education system provide an opportunity to make it feel it better. In From this way, all the people become more conscious about the incredible place of kindness in their lives. In addition, people respect and are proud of themselves due to their attitudes and behavior. Overall, we could not ignore the main concept and result of kindness to the societies and people. From the beginning of the mankind men kind until this century, honor has have been had an inevitable place in the people's lives. All of us should show the real impression of kindness to each other and motivate others to judge other persons by their behavior. This is not possible unless, we respect all the people around the world regardless of their social status and like them.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It is an undeniable fact that in these days we are confronted with a ubiquity proliferation of fat people. In from my perspective, putting extra tax on fast food can diminish the number of this increase. Burgeoning population and workaholic behavior make people to consume more fast food. Majority of people have to work hard during the day, therefore, they have not ample time for making dinner. But the point is this; inordinate using of this kind of food has serious impact on health and induces obesity, heart diseases and liver disorders. The first action which reduces the number of consumers can be made by the with government by imposing some extra taxes on these productions. It not only prevents people to notfrom using junk food, but also helps the to general health condition of society. On the other hand, it is totally a fallacy that all consumers of fast food are fat just because of eating them. Other factors such as environmental conditions and genetics have influence on this fact. Furthermore, some people say that if we put extra taxes on fast food or boycott them completely, it cannot hinder people from becoming fat. And also they believe that by increasing the quality of these products productions and also teaching people to be aware of that how much fast food they can have in each month, we will face better general health condition. To sum up, although I am not in a position to mandate people to take more taxes on fast food, from in my viewpoint, these kinds of actions for the time being can diminish obesities expeditiously.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays with advancement of technology and new way of business people can purchase the same goods almost everywhere in the world which was were not accessible in the past. I would argue that this is a positive trend to easy and instant access to the same market in every country and this essay will discuss this issue. It can be argued that there are numerous advantages to have similar products in every countries country .First of all it can be mentioned that widespread existence of products in all communities can reduce the cost of these goods, so a vast majority of people can purchase those kinds of materials. Not only does having easy and instant access cause lower price of special product but also increase its it's popularity among different societies. The Second useful factor about this issue is that people have the same opportunity and chances to access high quality products compared to the past which only developed countries have this right to benefit from high material goods and Also it can be mentioned in modern ways of business which are is based on the recent high technology, customers do not need to wait long for a long time to receive their order from foreign communities as it is available and easy to access in their own countries. This trend is beneficial especially for underdeveloped countries which is find it difficult to get some special and technical products in the past but nowadays the situation has been totally changed and almost every modern society has this opportunity to get products which they want. To sum up, I would argue that people can be benefited from getting access to the same market in every country because at least they can access to competitive market which did does not exist in the past decades in such a way away.