جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think it would be a good idea for schools to teach every young person how to be a good parent. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Describe the skills a person needs to be a good parent. There is a some doubt as to whether schools should hold classes about parental skills for pupils or it is unnecessary for them. Personally, although I agree that schools should be responsible for educating students to be a good parent, parental lessons should not be too much and boring and takes a little time of them. Nowadays, young persons are struggling to find a good job which has a good salary, so they want to go school and university and become an expert. It is undoubtable that the first priority of schools should be teaching individual lessons to students by which they can find a better job and social position. However, general knowledge such as parental, communication and social skills are important too. For instance, if you have a great and well-paying job while you are not able to be a good father/mother for your children due to lack of your parental skill, it would be a big problem. So your children may face a lot of serious problems not only physical but also mental problems. Therefore, governments should force schools to have these lessons. On the other hand, parental courses should not be too much. If the number of lessons are high, it would be boring and pupils would have no time for other important courses. According tofrom my viewpoint, there are some skills which make a person a good parent. First and foremost is how they can be patient. Secondly, they need to learn how to be responsible for their children. Last but not least, they should gain some skills about how they can raise their baby, how they can feed a baby and how they can take care of their baby. In conclusion, even though schools should focus on teaching young generation to have better jobs, also teaching them to be a good parent is important.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

If you are required to give feedback about your classmates/colleagues (work or performance), would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first? It is clear that nowadays, people have simultaneously different roles and responsibilities in diverse situations and this is inevitable that an individual has always the best performance. On the other hand, one of the key points which can lead to better achievement, is to give comments to people we are working with and also being receptive to others̕ criticism. One of the questions that arises here is whether it is better people give positive feedback first or negative ones. I myself agree with the former and in the following paragraphs, I will describe my reasons. First and foremost, people are a mixture of strengths and weaknesses. If we want to see and evaluate a person, we should be able to see her as a whole. It is a proven fact/a given that when we start to give positive feedbacks first, people keep on listening to us and they are more likely to accept negative comments because they evaluate our feedbacks more as an offer and suggestion rather reproach. Statistics show that when we give negative points at first, individuals do not follow what you are talking about and instead they try to defence defend themselves. The second reason that we should notice on is the goal of criticism. When your aim is to solve a problem and boost the advantages of that person- that which indirectly causes in improvement of the company- it is better to show that you also pay attention to her strengths. Pointing out just the negative aspects can decrease/harm/weaken/dent the selfesteem and self-efficacy. Moreover, it can make the person angry and if she does not express her rage and talk about that, she will behave as a passive-aggressive person that which not only does it not improve the efficiency, but rather can hurt the relationships. As a result, criticism can have positive effect for people to know their weaknesses and overcome them, if it is have been used correctly. So it is suggested that if a person wants to make exert positive effects, it is better at first to talktalking about positive aspects. Used sparingly and judiciously, blame can prod people to work harder.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Mona Doorsian Some suggest that young people should take a job for a few years between school and university. Discuss what the advantages and disadvantages might be for people who do this. There it is more and more evident for students to work for a period of time rather than going straight to the university. There are some positive points to this, but I think it has also some risks which could lead to some kinds of problems. The most obvious disadvantage of getting a job is that you may find that you cannot get a university place at a later stage. This is due tobecause there may be a lot of competition for places, and the longer you wait, the harder it may be to get one. You could even find that the course you want has been changed or dropped. Another negative aspect is that you can lose the ability of studying. For example, school students are trained to use a range of study skills, which help them achieve academic success. However, if you are not using these skills regularly, it is easy to forget them. This could make university life much harder. On the other hand, there are several positive outlooks to toward gettingget a job. One of them is that you can become independent. For instant, people who earn their own money can rent their own apartment. Additionally, some of the money can be saved and used to pay for university fees. Another significant benefit is that working gives you some time to think about what you would really like to study. This is very beneficial if you are unsure about your future career. To sum up briefly, from my point of view there are arguments for and against the idea of working between school and university. from my point of view The important thing is to be aware of both aspects and choose the path that best suits your personal situation.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. No one can ever deny a the significant role of parents in children’s future life. They can be extremely effective on various aspects during their children’s lives. I personally support this statement for a couple of reasons which I explain in this essay. For the most and main reasons which can be on the top and covers other reasons is " being independent " which means if parents encourage their children to have a part-time jobs they can understand the independent concepts which can be beneficial for them. Children have to done their jobs without getting aid from others or their parents and in place of taking money and if they have done well, they will take more money. For instance, when I was at highschool I had a summer job. I delivered foods by bike at green burger and my boss said "If any of you delivers the food to the customer sooner, I will give more money ". I had to ride a bike carefully and delivere the orders as soon as possible without anyone's help to get more money. Besides, when teenagers start working, they figure out the meaning of responsibility which means they have variable tasks that they have to do in the best possible way. This responsibility can help children to prepare for their future responsibilities such as marriage, having a pet or a baby. In the above example, delivering foods sound safely and on time food was my responsibility. Another remarkable points is that, by starting to work children can learn how to manage their time and their money. Although this teenager working might has have a side effects and If they manage their time, it cannot endanger affect their homework or lessons. On the other hand, teenagers can realize about money value and how tough it can it be to make money, so they attempt to save their budget and get make an informed decision to spend it. Ultimately, persuade persuading teenagers to take a part-time job will impact on diverse aspects of their life. It teaches them how important they can be independent, have more responsibility and how they should manage their time and money. They can comprehend the concept of money value also they can earn extremely worthy experiences.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Shopping is the favorite pastime for most young people . why do you think is that ? Do you think they should be encourage to do some other useful activities ? Purchasing is a popular hobby for most of the teenagers , some people think we should encourage them to spent spend their time for on more beneficial stuff activities , in my opinion you can try to encourage them but it may not work for every one . I think that the young people spending their time for shopping is not too bad because when you are young you like to be good looking specially in among your peer group and you will live your youth just once so you want to do the things that you like , also shopping can be related to other activities that you may like , for instance when you are willing to do sport or you like parties you need clothes and sport stuff . thus shopping is not always a bad thing and it can be necessary for your beneficial activities. On the other hand, trying to encourage young people to spend their time for on more useful activities is a good idea like giving some new thoughts or plans to them about the activities that they might have no information about. showing the advantages of having a daily plan in their life and teaching them about long term plans for their life can be helpful to managing manage their time and they can have a better choice . As a result, being passionate about shopping is a part of youth and we need to live this period of our life too but like always we need the experiences , advisesadvice and guidance from people who they are older than us for less fewer mistakes and less regrets in future . The pie charts show the average household expenditures in a county in 1950 and 2010 . The pie charts illustrate the inhabitant expenses in a township in 1950 and 2010. Overall it can be seen that in 1950 the main part of the expenses was for housing and after that was food in the second place , but in 2010 food was the first and housing was the second .In 1950 housing with 72.1 percent was the main part of expenses and food with 11.2 percent was after housing . education , other and transportation with ( 6.6 percent , 4.4 percent and 3.3 percent ) respectively were after food , health with only 2.4 percent was the lowest one . in 2010 food with 34.0 percent was the highest and housing with 22.0 percent was after food , the next place with 19.2 percent was for other . the same as in 1950 the , health care also in 2010 was the lowest. transportation with 14.0 and education with 6.3 were after other .