جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In many places, now homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside .some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new home there. What is your opinion about this? In some countries, there are many spaces and fields around the big cities that have high potential for constructing and allocating accommodation to those who need home. But a large number of citizens are disagree about any constructing and they prefer to have perfectly intact region. Some advocates of urbanization believe that in this era that everything are developing because of the advent of technologies and sciences, all the tools and systems should follow this inevitable trend. For example, a large number of field which is exist for agricultural uses should change to other uses such as building factory, apartment and many other advances use. I take the view that constructing building in countryside may be a enormous help to those who can not buy expensive one in cities and this solution will tackle the majority of individuals problems. Moreover, the infrastructure of cities do not have capacity to construction anymore. Whilst the popularity of some cities such as New York and Toronto are a vast amount of than other cities, the majority of people eager to live and business throughout them. Consequently, after a period of time immigrants have to accommodate in the countryside because of shortage of spaces. On the other hand, there is blurred line between having ruralization and omitting it from our culture and we have to be aware about it. Most of people who live and work in rural area revolutionize their life with this way of life for example , buying their local products to people who live in big cities. By way of conclusion , My position about this issue is more outweigh protecting countryside and I believe all culture and level of society should be exist beside each other.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. That changing the way of life is a good choice or not has always been an extremely arguable discussion among people always. Some believe changing methods can blemish their lives so they prefer to have a stable life instead of an awkward one. Others, however, claim confirming risk can help people to change their lives to a better one. Although both views can be acceptable from many groups of people, I prefer to join in the point of view experiencing a challenging life. On one hand, avoiding change and spending life in a the same way, people prefer to have a steady life. It is clear that if people live in a repetitive way, they will face with less unexpected events. Therefore, they will damage suffer lessfewer but it is really important to ask whether this is a wise and the best choice or just a simple one. On the other hand, I prefer to follow the point of view of accepting challenges of life because I believe that with/by experiencing and facing challenges and difficulties, humankind becoming become wiser and more reliable. Moreover, when people accidentally fall into some tricky situation, they learn how to behave and make a brilliant decision, handling that situation. For example, in a hard and surprising inflation or natural disaster, such as volcano volcanic eruption or earthquake, which on most occasions people are not aware of them, people experiencing different change will play an intense role by adapting themselves to it and helping others. Furthermore, in my opinion, steady life is so extremely boring and unbearable. Consequently, not only do is people’s change changing their lifestyle is good and helps them to be more practiced, but those one living in a the same way and avoiding change will have some problems in their lives constantly, hence my positive point of view to of changes.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Children today play very violent games. This must be the reason for the increase in violence and crime in most major cities of the world. What are your opinions on this? Nowadays, parents prefer to keep their children off the streets and out of the trouble. As a result children are more exposed to different types of new games which are brought by new technologies. The new games in particular computer games are including include some form of violence that can lead to crimes increase in major cities. In the past few years, children had been playingused to play the outdoor games with simple toys. However, children these days are almost playing individual video games inside the home as an epidemic life style in big cities. As a matter of fact, a level of computerized violence is embedded inside the video games, for instance, “Battle field” or “Call of Duty” both imply civil war situation. More importantly, computer games are being more realistic and bloodier. Some studies revealed that there is a direct casual link between the sales of violent video games and criminal behavior in the society. Some others demonstrate that, children usually behave more aggressively after leaving the gaming council console for a few minutes. Furthermore, it is reported that “Copycat” crimes are mostly committed when the violent characters of the video games are mimicked. In my opinion, violent video games can harm children’s psychological health in terms of angry feeling and lack of social intelligence. Video gaming also will cause a significant reduction in children’s physical activities as well. To sum up, I support the idea that considers the violent computer games as a casual risk factor for the children’s mental health and its positive correlation with crimes commitments in the major cities. What parents and governments need, is to control the video games contents as well as children’s spent time on computer games in order to prevent criminal activities in the society.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that children’s leisure activities must be educational, otherwise they are a complete waste of time. Do you agree or disagree? How children spend their free time is one of the most important priorities of parents seeking to secure a good future for their children in this rapidly changing world. Some argued that pupils should study most of their times due to obtaining a good career while there are limited opportunities to get hired or land a job in this unfairly competitive era, then it is completely true that young people have to study hard when they are young. However, older generations who do not allow their children utilize their free time in some physical or mental activities, are in wrong way of creating a bright future. In fact, leisure’s activities are a totally basic requirement as much as education. Having played with other same-aged, young people recuperate for amazingly good learning. Moreover, not only do some practical acts refresh young ones’ mind, but also improve their physical abilities. One of the best program in order to this issue is the activity planned in the school timetable which always include some periods dedicated to sports. As a result, they are force to get involved in the activities which are required motion resulting in maintaining their fitness level. In addition, continuously hard educating will probably lead to children facing with some problems. By way of an example, if a student is asked to perform an educational task in his extra time also, there are chances that he might start feelings frustrated with studying. In conclusion, I deem that an offspring getting engrossed in physical activities in spare interval have much patient to succeed compared to the others who are forced to simply study.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing. What do you think are the main causes of crime? How can we deal with those causes? Countries, especially the third world ones, have witnessed an increasingly upward trend in amount of illegal behavior in last few years. From my vantage point, there are many crucial factors, participating in this phenomenon, few of which are poverty, unemployment and drugs. In the following paragraphs, the mentioned reasons for felonies rise will be elaborated more fully before I suggest some solutions to resolve this problem. On the one hand, I believe that committing a crime rooted in many issues. Most important of which is poverty. To exemplify, imagine an extremely poor person, whose life is full of difficulties and obsessions, dying out of hunger,. how could he survive this situation without infraction of the law? From his point of view, not only is stealing a piece of bread not a crime, but also he feels that he is completely entitled to this bread as a small piece of his share from society. On the other hand, the people using drugs are much more prone to do any unlawful act since they have already lost their minds while they are doing it. Hardly a week goes by without a news from raping or holding people hostage by drug- addicted individuals. Surprisingly, when these people commit some crimes, they barely able to remember what they have done the next morning. Hence lack of security in society. To begin to tackle this situation the burden of responsibility lies in the hands of governments as the statistics have shown that the crime rate is considerably lower in countries, whose GDP(Gross Domestic Product) is higher and also have an efficient social welfare supports system/scheme for their citizens. To make my point crystal clear, if the government supports the needy and unemployed people properly, at least for their basic needs, obviously less crime would be committed. Furthermore, strict regulations can definitely deter criminals from committing crimes whose punishments are extremely intolerable. Last but not least, the authorities can inform people about possible consequences of illegal acts through different types of advertisements. The more people hear about these facts, the less they would do them.At last, that the crime rate has experienced a drastic rise in last years is highly correlated with poor economic conditions and inappropriate environment. Therefore, clearly it is on governments to address this problem by increasing social welfare level and imposing sever rules and punishments.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Happiness is considered very important in life. Why is it difficult to define? What factors are important in achieving happiness. Happiness plays an important role in people’s life, Even though stressful conditions are more common nowadays. The manner people face problems, reduce reducing the stress and provide providing positive situations are absolutely important for being happy. In my opinion, happiness is the main factors in a healthy life. If people attempt to be happy, most of their problems would will be solved. For instance, the power of happiness to cure diseases is incredible. Also, researches show that happiness leads to living more with healthier mind and body. Next, the ways which makes everyone happy are vital. Closed relationships with family particularly immediate ones help people to be more happy. Furthermore, sympathetic friends are quite effective. Those who give positive reinforcement to others, are usually well mannered. Besides, Since most of the life time are is spent at work, the less stressed atmosphere of work is important too. Making more efforts to establish friendly relationship between colleagues can aid them in being happy. On the other hand, I think through positive activities that happiness can be preserved. Sports, art, music, dance, reading various kinds of books and improving specific skills are some instances of the mentioned activities. Finally, I believe that helping others in each cases, gives people a large amount of positive energy as a miracle to achieve happiness. Consequently, further to the mentioned explanation, succeeding in establishing satisfactory relationship with family, friends and colleagues, assisting each other in different situations and doing positive activities are some effective factors in terms of happiness.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. These days, thanks to the ubiquity of modern technology throughout the world, sharing information is generally in vogue among different communities especially scientific and business ones. Yet there remains some disagreements as to whether the overall effect of this trend has been positive or negative. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, I, personally, believe that this trend has in fact been positive. On the one hand, it is an undeniable fact that these valuable achievements hardly gain by devotion of time, energy and perseverance of their ingenious authors. Accessed freely to public, not only might this information barely been acknowledged, but it also been used in an inefficient and dangerous way which could lead to offensive activities. Take for example instruction on how to make bombs as a content of engineering science world can be used in a terrorist attack. Therefore, given the seriousness of security and value of precious materials, some regulations which restrict this free flow of information would be justified. On the other hand, in my belief a strongest society is a homogeneous one with shared values and knowledge. Since the importance of cooperation and consultation in science progress, it is worthwhile to constitute culture of subscribing data with each other to achieve extremely valuable accomplishments. Equally importantly, though, this kind of indulgence from innovators can gradually promote the literacy level in society. Admittedly, this free flow of information can be abused in catastrophic crimes. Nevertheless, most people have benefited greatly from this incredibly useful facilitate both in marketing industry and science promotion. Finally, in many developed countries, what virtually inspire scientists’ performance and trigger their genius is prior discoveries which are easily available for public, hence their indisputability fast-growing progress. In conclusion, I once again restate my view that we should laud the privilege that sharing information and ideas brings to us in all sense of the word. Of course an authority should carry out surveillance of the materials to take the best use of them.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In some countries . many people do not have enough money to access the internet. Should goverments be responsible for ensuring that everyone can get access to the internet? Nowadays internet plays an important role in our daily life. We can shop almost shop anything from the internet . where ever you walk in , you can use all the facilities with your cell phone’s wifi In this essay , i am going to explain my idea Firstly , I want to mention that techology and internet is taking over the world the growth and popularity of the internet is insane and fascinating Barely you can find a home without the internet or a cellphone which doesnt offer mobile data Another point to make is the data which internet offer us . you can easily search the data you want and you can download it and keep the information forever Imagine how hard is it when you cannot use the internet . In my point of view i think goverments must provide the citizens with the best form of any item They are the ones who will get the most benefit out of it. While extend it for the people , they can easily receive tax and make more profit. Secondly , not only goverments can profit from it but also they can make our daily basis facile . You caln transfer money from your mobiles easily and it helps you save time from not going to your local banks Although , goverments can have an easy access to our imporant info and it can attack our privacy but i think having it has more benefits than not having it In conclusion , i think its every and each goverments’ duty to supply the facilities which makes life easier

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding changes. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing? - Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. In this new world, in the past decades the pace of life in some areas has been accelerated and change is inevitable. Some people are welcoming for any changes in their life pursuing the development. Yet there are some people who are reluctant to change. I tend to agree that change can be a good thing even if it does not seems so. Living in the world of technology and communication age that change is inevitable, adopting the change in any form not only assist people to in growing, it also gives multitude options to experience. Therefore, willingness to accept the change can be a more positive approach rather than resistance to it. For example, the Internet usage in the educational system is a seemingly inevitable phenomenon. In such cases, initiating a newly invented educational approach can be beneficial. On the other hand, still there are prejudiced people that find change not easy to accept. These people prefer to stay in their comfort zone and do not experience new opportunities as well. They are people who are not willing to take risk of changing their place of leaving, their job and their way of living. In addition to above, sometimes they are not open to accept new technologies and new systems and will resist to them?? as long as they are not forced to. In summary, there are two different approaches to change. A group of people that are ready to take risks, and show willingness to any changes. Second, reluctantly resistantce people who will not accept the changeeasily. Both groups have their own justifications and from different points of view they may seems acceptable.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Online, people write product reviews and opinions about services. Is it a good thing or bad thing? Nowadays, many products are produced and presented to markets to fulfil the customers’ needs(irrelevant). Online shopping facilitates purchasing processes especially by providing the possibility for buyers to give their feedbacks and also read other views about products. Taking this into account, this essay tries to review the benefits of these feedbacks and the issues that are getting in the way. Product and service reviews can easily provide guidance for people who are considering buying a new product. Not only do they help in finding the best product that fits the user’s requirements but also they give people the opportunity to ask their questions about a specific product from to users who have recently bought it. In addition, producers are able to get their customers’ feedback almost gratis and consider them for their new products that are planned to be produced. There is also a possibility of encouraging potential customers to purchase a product that is not their immediate necessity by sharing users’ ideas in advertisements. On the other hand, there might be a few issues when reviews is published on the Internet. That everyone has a unique expectation from a specific product is undeniable. Based on this fact, It should be noted that people’s opinions may be different and a useful product for a person can be a waste of money for another one. Furthermore, it is possible for business competitors and their fans to adopt an unprofessional way of advertising by sending hopelessly incorrect reviews. In conclusion, although reviews help people on many occasions, the negative impacts of them should not be overlooked. One of the most effective ways for reduction of these effects is to set a rating system for reviews. The more a review is unreal, the more negative dislikes it gets.