Mondays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/349-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-07-16 2024-05-03T15:29:10+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Climate Change, Mahdis 2018-10-17T07:19:10+00:00 2018-10-17T07:19:10+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/349-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-07-16/2388-climate-change-mahdis <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Climate Change, Mahdis.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Instead of preventing climate change we should live with it, to what extent do you agree? Perhaps the greatest threat to the word is climate change and environmental degradation. some people argue that we have to accept this issue and live with it but I completely disagree with this opinion. We still have time to tackle this problem and at least imitate it. Although climate change is considered a slow process, sooner or later it could be a serious threat to our feature generation. With the development of technology, raise in the number of automobiles, industrial pollution, and overpopulation, humans life encounter with a critical situation. Climate change is the result of deforestation, emit toxic gases, over consuming fossil fuels and lack of awareness. Global warming is a kind of climate change. This phenomenon could make a disaster. for example, if polar ice melting because of global warming ,some coast countries submerged and many people will lose their homes so it creates homelessness and poverty .in addition, global warming leads to flood, drought and increase level of seas and oceans. To control these tragic events, the government and individuals have to contribute together. The government should invest more in renewable energies like solar power, wind power, bioenergy, and hydropower to decrease use of fossil fuels and carbon emission. They should be punishing who emitted carbon deliberately. For example, financial penalties for unroadworthy car drivers that emit carbon .they can increase people awareness with programs and motivate them to contribute to tackling this issue. They can promote public transport systems to decrease using of private cars and individuals should obey the regulations regard to preventing climate change. To conclude, I believe that we have to find a solution for preventing climate change and in this regard, the government and individuals should work hand in hand, otherwise, we should stay and watch our extinction.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Climate Change, Mahdis.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Instead of preventing climate change we should live with it, to what extent do you agree? Perhaps the greatest threat to the word is climate change and environmental degradation. some people argue that we have to accept this issue and live with it but I completely disagree with this opinion. We still have time to tackle this problem and at least imitate it. Although climate change is considered a slow process, sooner or later it could be a serious threat to our feature generation. With the development of technology, raise in the number of automobiles, industrial pollution, and overpopulation, humans life encounter with a critical situation. Climate change is the result of deforestation, emit toxic gases, over consuming fossil fuels and lack of awareness. Global warming is a kind of climate change. This phenomenon could make a disaster. for example, if polar ice melting because of global warming ,some coast countries submerged and many people will lose their homes so it creates homelessness and poverty .in addition, global warming leads to flood, drought and increase level of seas and oceans. To control these tragic events, the government and individuals have to contribute together. The government should invest more in renewable energies like solar power, wind power, bioenergy, and hydropower to decrease use of fossil fuels and carbon emission. They should be punishing who emitted carbon deliberately. For example, financial penalties for unroadworthy car drivers that emit carbon .they can increase people awareness with programs and motivate them to contribute to tackling this issue. They can promote public transport systems to decrease using of private cars and individuals should obey the regulations regard to preventing climate change. To conclude, I believe that we have to find a solution for preventing climate change and in this regard, the government and individuals should work hand in hand, otherwise, we should stay and watch our extinction.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Educational Activities, Maryam Asgari 2018-10-17T07:18:58+00:00 2018-10-17T07:18:58+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/349-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-07-16/2387-educational-activities-maryam-asgari <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Educational Activities, Maryam Asgari.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Whether the game being played should be relevant to children education or not, has recently sparked a heated debate. I profoundly disagree with involving children in a never-ending study program indirectly by games, and my firm conviction is that games as well as sports should be played for pleasure and not for teaching. Firstly, those games which are devised to be educational are no substitute for those that are played for their own sake. It is not difficult for brain to distinguish between a pure enjoyment and an activity involving the mind to think. This way children soon get tired of studying, and this child cannot be hoping to be good at multi-tasking as well,all of which, possibly make a person to be successful in neither personal life, nor professional life. The parenting style that place more value on acquisition and swamp children even through games might lead to nurturing a person with several mental problems, since games are necessary for a child's development, and in retrospect, the parents would wonder if they should have done otherwise. Secondly, most of the games that are irrelevant to education, can teach other things to people which are of great value. For example, playing football is not followed to teach or boost a subject in the school curriculum, but instead can teach children how to lead a happy, social life. Players can take the best lessons even when losing. They simply are taught to begin a start again and not to be frustrated of the next time that might fail. Winning can bring them out of themselves ,and being confident is not less important than being studious. They also can understand the increasing importance of competition and cooperation in society. Finally this person will be a successful and productive manager or even worker. In conclusion, I believe everything has its own place in our everyday life, and that depriving children of having sufficient leisure activities to set them on studying in any way possible, will create a future for people with no adventure to be reminisced, leaving them unhappy, failed and unfortunately unsuccessful.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Educational Activities, Maryam Asgari.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Whether the game being played should be relevant to children education or not, has recently sparked a heated debate. I profoundly disagree with involving children in a never-ending study program indirectly by games, and my firm conviction is that games as well as sports should be played for pleasure and not for teaching. Firstly, those games which are devised to be educational are no substitute for those that are played for their own sake. It is not difficult for brain to distinguish between a pure enjoyment and an activity involving the mind to think. This way children soon get tired of studying, and this child cannot be hoping to be good at multi-tasking as well,all of which, possibly make a person to be successful in neither personal life, nor professional life. The parenting style that place more value on acquisition and swamp children even through games might lead to nurturing a person with several mental problems, since games are necessary for a child's development, and in retrospect, the parents would wonder if they should have done otherwise. Secondly, most of the games that are irrelevant to education, can teach other things to people which are of great value. For example, playing football is not followed to teach or boost a subject in the school curriculum, but instead can teach children how to lead a happy, social life. Players can take the best lessons even when losing. They simply are taught to begin a start again and not to be frustrated of the next time that might fail. Winning can bring them out of themselves ,and being confident is not less important than being studious. They also can understand the increasing importance of competition and cooperation in society. Finally this person will be a successful and productive manager or even worker. In conclusion, I believe everything has its own place in our everyday life, and that depriving children of having sufficient leisure activities to set them on studying in any way possible, will create a future for people with no adventure to be reminisced, leaving them unhappy, failed and unfortunately unsuccessful.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Fast Food Consumption Chart, Ali Khaleghifard 2018-10-17T07:18:46+00:00 2018-10-17T07:18:46+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/349-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-07-16/2386-fast-food-consumption-chart-ali-khaleghifard <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Fast Food Consumption Chart, Ali Khaleghifard.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">The figure presents the data about how popular fast food is in the USA which have been marked for three different years, that is 2003, 2006 and 2013. At first look, it can obviously be seen that, presented by statistics, most of people ate fast food once a week or once or twice a month in all three years. Being at it maximum in 2013 for once or twice a month, the proportion of fast-food-eaters in 2003 and 2006 at its high level for those who consumed it once a week which are around 31 per cent and 33 per cent in the same order. While in 2003 everyday-fast–food-eaters and neverfast-food-eaters are more than the other two periods, in 2006 and 2013 the percentages remained steadily around three per cent and four per cent respectively. Additionally, although the portions of people who ate fast food just for a few times a year stayed at 15 per cent for both 2006 and 2013, they have a little bit of increase around two per cent in comparison with that in 2003. Overall, although the proportion of the people who fast food was favored by and every day consumed by experienced a one per cent fall, for those who never ate it the decrease was similar to everyday-eaters. Furthermore, it can visibly be understood that only when people ate just a few times a year ate at fast food restaurants, does the popularity of eating fast food have around a two per cent growth in 2003 in contrast with both 2006 and 2013 and for other groups it was at least more than one period.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Fast Food Consumption Chart, Ali Khaleghifard.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">The figure presents the data about how popular fast food is in the USA which have been marked for three different years, that is 2003, 2006 and 2013. At first look, it can obviously be seen that, presented by statistics, most of people ate fast food once a week or once or twice a month in all three years. Being at it maximum in 2013 for once or twice a month, the proportion of fast-food-eaters in 2003 and 2006 at its high level for those who consumed it once a week which are around 31 per cent and 33 per cent in the same order. While in 2003 everyday-fast–food-eaters and neverfast-food-eaters are more than the other two periods, in 2006 and 2013 the percentages remained steadily around three per cent and four per cent respectively. Additionally, although the portions of people who ate fast food just for a few times a year stayed at 15 per cent for both 2006 and 2013, they have a little bit of increase around two per cent in comparison with that in 2003. Overall, although the proportion of the people who fast food was favored by and every day consumed by experienced a one per cent fall, for those who never ate it the decrease was similar to everyday-eaters. Furthermore, it can visibly be understood that only when people ate just a few times a year ate at fast food restaurants, does the popularity of eating fast food have around a two per cent growth in 2003 in contrast with both 2006 and 2013 and for other groups it was at least more than one period.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Job for Older 50 Years Old 2018-10-17T07:18:29+00:00 2018-10-17T07:18:29+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/349-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-07-16/2385-job-for-older-50-years-old <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Job for Older 50 Years Old.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Age limitation is one of the most challenging problems which human resource in upper age fifty of some nations might encounter, regardless how strong experience they might have in the particular career. While I entirely believe that truely sucsessful system is able to utilize such precious and beneficial resources in order to boost up its productivity. Unfortunately, different factors may cause the employers being often reluctant to hire an old worker. Firstly,as a common view , the person reaching his late forty might be less willing to work as hard and effective as a youngester does. Partly because he is considered to have passed a half or more way therefore no more motivation could impel him to show perseverance and progress. Secondly the changes of professions in terms of technology and upgraded information makes it reasonable for the employers to be more eager to invest in a rather young worker with an ideal perspective and more ready to be molded, in comparison with the older ones. However, both energy and up-to-dated ideas which are brought by a fresh and young worker to the workplace cannot be denied. The trials resulting in mistakes, is an inevitable part of a young worker’s development. Could a system take advantage of a fully-experienced worker , the amount of such wrongdoings which sometimes may cost an arm an leg, could be relatively reduced. A novice teacher in a school,as an example, who may see it a great struggle to come up with specific situations or problems relating to his careear can refer ro a supervisor who is often a person who is supported by years of experience behind and abe to pave the way far easier. Having the oportunity to hire such an old but efffective person, the companies must not geoparadise their rights of benefiting from these knowledge and experience sources. Although working with younger staff might be more reasonable on the face of it, but when knowledge and backgorunds comes into consideration, not only does the age provide no limitation , but it will turn into a matter of importance. Since the older and more experienced a worker is the better performance would be expectable.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Job for Older 50 Years Old.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Age limitation is one of the most challenging problems which human resource in upper age fifty of some nations might encounter, regardless how strong experience they might have in the particular career. While I entirely believe that truely sucsessful system is able to utilize such precious and beneficial resources in order to boost up its productivity. Unfortunately, different factors may cause the employers being often reluctant to hire an old worker. Firstly,as a common view , the person reaching his late forty might be less willing to work as hard and effective as a youngester does. Partly because he is considered to have passed a half or more way therefore no more motivation could impel him to show perseverance and progress. Secondly the changes of professions in terms of technology and upgraded information makes it reasonable for the employers to be more eager to invest in a rather young worker with an ideal perspective and more ready to be molded, in comparison with the older ones. However, both energy and up-to-dated ideas which are brought by a fresh and young worker to the workplace cannot be denied. The trials resulting in mistakes, is an inevitable part of a young worker’s development. Could a system take advantage of a fully-experienced worker , the amount of such wrongdoings which sometimes may cost an arm an leg, could be relatively reduced. A novice teacher in a school,as an example, who may see it a great struggle to come up with specific situations or problems relating to his careear can refer ro a supervisor who is often a person who is supported by years of experience behind and abe to pave the way far easier. Having the oportunity to hire such an old but efffective person, the companies must not geoparadise their rights of benefiting from these knowledge and experience sources. Although working with younger staff might be more reasonable on the face of it, but when knowledge and backgorunds comes into consideration, not only does the age provide no limitation , but it will turn into a matter of importance. Since the older and more experienced a worker is the better performance would be expectable.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Old Building or Road, Boshra 2018-10-17T07:18:16+00:00 2018-10-17T07:18:16+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/349-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-07-16/2384-old-building-or-road-boshra <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Old Building or Road, Boshra.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Restoration of old building in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience? The issue of constructing a new building or refurbishing the old one has sparked a heated debate among researchers some of whom assume that we had better allocate certain amount of budget to building a new home and road rather than repairing the old one. From my point of view, if we reformed our existing constructions, it would be of great benefit, and I wholeheartedly agree with the group claiming that restoration is significantly more beneficial. First and foremost, building a new home is consist of extortionate costs, for the builder need to spend huge sums of money on purchasing resources such as stone, brick and metals. By contrast, in refurbishing an old one the doer can save old instruments and they just need to be fixed. In other words, by restoring an old building we in fact transform otherwise useless items to last longer and effective tools, thereby the government enjoys saving more money and even grows capable of developing or building roads too. On the other hand, some others assert that design of newly built homes is predicated on cost-efficient ways of constructing, hence their wasting less energy. In this way, the owner should consume less energy to make their accommodation cool or heat which is much more environmentally friendly and energy-efficient. Last but not least, these places are more adaptable to new generations’ ideas and their life styles. For instance, in the past most families consist of three or more children as opposed to now when they mostly prefer to have merely one charge. On the whole, I once again reaffirm my position regarding the opinion that reforming an old building is better that constructing a new one.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Old Building or Road, Boshra.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Restoration of old building in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience? The issue of constructing a new building or refurbishing the old one has sparked a heated debate among researchers some of whom assume that we had better allocate certain amount of budget to building a new home and road rather than repairing the old one. From my point of view, if we reformed our existing constructions, it would be of great benefit, and I wholeheartedly agree with the group claiming that restoration is significantly more beneficial. First and foremost, building a new home is consist of extortionate costs, for the builder need to spend huge sums of money on purchasing resources such as stone, brick and metals. By contrast, in refurbishing an old one the doer can save old instruments and they just need to be fixed. In other words, by restoring an old building we in fact transform otherwise useless items to last longer and effective tools, thereby the government enjoys saving more money and even grows capable of developing or building roads too. On the other hand, some others assert that design of newly built homes is predicated on cost-efficient ways of constructing, hence their wasting less energy. In this way, the owner should consume less energy to make their accommodation cool or heat which is much more environmentally friendly and energy-efficient. Last but not least, these places are more adaptable to new generations’ ideas and their life styles. For instance, in the past most families consist of three or more children as opposed to now when they mostly prefer to have merely one charge. On the whole, I once again reaffirm my position regarding the opinion that reforming an old building is better that constructing a new one.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> People Similarity in the World, Mahta 2018-10-17T07:18:03+00:00 2018-10-17T07:18:03+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/349-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-07-16/2383-people-similarity-in-the-world-mahta <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/People Similarity in the World, Mahta.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Due to the international market improvement the world has experienced a kind of similarity recently. In other words, once started to exchange products broadly, the countries became more similar to each other in terms of their consumption patterns. From my vantage point, although this phenomenon has some drawbacks, its advantages obviously outweigh the disadvantages. In this essay, I will elaborate my opinion by analyzing both the bright and dark sides of the argument. On the one hand, becoming more interested in worldwide mutual taste in different aspects of life, nations have gradually forgotten their traditions. In other words, travelers can easily find many famous clothes brands such as Zara and Mango, whose items are just the same in various countries, in luxurious shopping malls all around the world these days. Consequently, you can rarely find traditional dresses in stores. Hence, the ancient histories are on the road of oblivion, which is not acceptable for many patriotic people. On the other hand, travelling to another country were full of unknown frightening experiences before, which made it harder decision to make. As a case in point, when an individual wanted to go abroad, a new place with another food cultures, he had to take some foods with him since he wasn’t aware of how tolerable the destination’s foods would be. In contrast, in today’s world, that there are many international restaurant like McDonalds and KFC available in every country, appealing different tastes, has made any journey far easier than before. Besides, today many people ought to change their place of leaving for logical reasons, two of which are better job and higher education. Therefore, not only does this phenomenon have positive influence on short tours, but also it can pave the way for immigrants to move more recklessly with less concern about adapting themselves to new environments.At last, the main conclusion to be drawn from this discussion is that although this resemblance might endanger the countries’ customs, it has considerable merits. Thus, were I to choose, I would definitely vote for this unifying process.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/People Similarity in the World, Mahta.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Due to the international market improvement the world has experienced a kind of similarity recently. In other words, once started to exchange products broadly, the countries became more similar to each other in terms of their consumption patterns. From my vantage point, although this phenomenon has some drawbacks, its advantages obviously outweigh the disadvantages. In this essay, I will elaborate my opinion by analyzing both the bright and dark sides of the argument. On the one hand, becoming more interested in worldwide mutual taste in different aspects of life, nations have gradually forgotten their traditions. In other words, travelers can easily find many famous clothes brands such as Zara and Mango, whose items are just the same in various countries, in luxurious shopping malls all around the world these days. Consequently, you can rarely find traditional dresses in stores. Hence, the ancient histories are on the road of oblivion, which is not acceptable for many patriotic people. On the other hand, travelling to another country were full of unknown frightening experiences before, which made it harder decision to make. As a case in point, when an individual wanted to go abroad, a new place with another food cultures, he had to take some foods with him since he wasn’t aware of how tolerable the destination’s foods would be. In contrast, in today’s world, that there are many international restaurant like McDonalds and KFC available in every country, appealing different tastes, has made any journey far easier than before. Besides, today many people ought to change their place of leaving for logical reasons, two of which are better job and higher education. Therefore, not only does this phenomenon have positive influence on short tours, but also it can pave the way for immigrants to move more recklessly with less concern about adapting themselves to new environments.At last, the main conclusion to be drawn from this discussion is that although this resemblance might endanger the countries’ customs, it has considerable merits. Thus, were I to choose, I would definitely vote for this unifying process.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Petrol Price and Traffic, Azadeh 2018-10-17T07:17:51+00:00 2018-10-17T07:17:51+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/349-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-07-16/2382-petrol-price-and-traffic-azadeh <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Petrol Price and Traffic, Azadeh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems The past 50 years have seen a dramatic increase in the traffic congestion and its detrimental consequences like air and noise pollution associated with consuming fossil fuels to excess. While some believe that increasing the price of petrol is the main solution to these problems, I personally would argue that we should implement some effective measurments simultaneously to overcome this phenomenon. The reason of my position and some positive measures are as follows. It is an undeniable fact that car use, producing a vast amount of greenhouse gases, are certainly responsible for environment degradation. If the government increased the price of petrol, though by no means in the short term, people would either turn to fuel-efficient cars or at least reduce their dispensable trips. In other words, if the government want to be consistent in pursuing its war on pollution and traffic, through growing its proportion of expenditure people appreciate its value and consume it optimally. Admittedly, increasing the price would constitute an effective first step to stem the tide of traffic and pollution, nevertheless this solution is neither the best nor the sole measurment for resolving the deleterious consequences. In order to overriding the benefits of society than those of individuals who use substandard car conducive to mass amount of pollution and traffic, in my belief they should be forced to pay fine to compensate their cars’ impacts upon the environment. Furthermore, the government could give subsidies to entrepreneurs to produce more hybrid and renewable-fuel cars. Therefore, besides the more price charged, doing other measurments at the same time like reducing the countless cars which leadsing to a heavily polluted environement through fine payments or alternative options are cure-all for car emission problems. By way of conclusion, the problems of traffic and pollution are complex and numerous. Although they are by no means insurmountable, it is highly unlikely that they will be resolved in the foreseeable future. It is through public education campaign we can encourage people to use public transportation when they are not time conscious.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Petrol Price and Traffic, Azadeh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems The past 50 years have seen a dramatic increase in the traffic congestion and its detrimental consequences like air and noise pollution associated with consuming fossil fuels to excess. While some believe that increasing the price of petrol is the main solution to these problems, I personally would argue that we should implement some effective measurments simultaneously to overcome this phenomenon. The reason of my position and some positive measures are as follows. It is an undeniable fact that car use, producing a vast amount of greenhouse gases, are certainly responsible for environment degradation. If the government increased the price of petrol, though by no means in the short term, people would either turn to fuel-efficient cars or at least reduce their dispensable trips. In other words, if the government want to be consistent in pursuing its war on pollution and traffic, through growing its proportion of expenditure people appreciate its value and consume it optimally. Admittedly, increasing the price would constitute an effective first step to stem the tide of traffic and pollution, nevertheless this solution is neither the best nor the sole measurment for resolving the deleterious consequences. In order to overriding the benefits of society than those of individuals who use substandard car conducive to mass amount of pollution and traffic, in my belief they should be forced to pay fine to compensate their cars’ impacts upon the environment. Furthermore, the government could give subsidies to entrepreneurs to produce more hybrid and renewable-fuel cars. Therefore, besides the more price charged, doing other measurments at the same time like reducing the countless cars which leadsing to a heavily polluted environement through fine payments or alternative options are cure-all for car emission problems. By way of conclusion, the problems of traffic and pollution are complex and numerous. Although they are by no means insurmountable, it is highly unlikely that they will be resolved in the foreseeable future. It is through public education campaign we can encourage people to use public transportation when they are not time conscious.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Recycling, Narges 2018-10-17T07:17:37+00:00 2018-10-17T07:17:37+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/349-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-07-16/2381-recycling-narges <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Recycling, Narges.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people claim that not enough of waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? Nowadays there has been much debate revolving around the issue that the amount of the waste recycled are not adequate as well as some people suppose the most practical solution to rise recycling refers to the laws is authorized by government. From my perspective, by legislating some rules about this occasion , …. can trigger some progresses. I defense my point of view by supplying some reasons and instances in the following essay. Firstly, the government has to recognize the value of recycling. So it make government utilize educational systems to elevate student's knowledge about recovering . The fact that the generating products from waste can save time, materials and energy, will encourage people to enhance their information about it. The next step can be providing several reasonable rules supporting the recycling . For instance , the family who follows the legal requirement, can be given some prizes such as declining in their taxes which they had to pay yearly or taking some insurance free. Not only can the government provides some laws , it can also spend amount its budget . Furthermore, government is able to aid the factories which are going to establish their producing by using recycled material instead of pure one. In conclusion , if the value of recovering is comprehended , the majority of people will admire this activity beside government. Hence, it is necessary to put some efforts to rise recycling by legislating/introducing some rules.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Recycling, Narges.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people claim that not enough of waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? Nowadays there has been much debate revolving around the issue that the amount of the waste recycled are not adequate as well as some people suppose the most practical solution to rise recycling refers to the laws is authorized by government. From my perspective, by legislating some rules about this occasion , …. can trigger some progresses. I defense my point of view by supplying some reasons and instances in the following essay. Firstly, the government has to recognize the value of recycling. So it make government utilize educational systems to elevate student's knowledge about recovering . The fact that the generating products from waste can save time, materials and energy, will encourage people to enhance their information about it. The next step can be providing several reasonable rules supporting the recycling . For instance , the family who follows the legal requirement, can be given some prizes such as declining in their taxes which they had to pay yearly or taking some insurance free. Not only can the government provides some laws , it can also spend amount its budget . Furthermore, government is able to aid the factories which are going to establish their producing by using recycled material instead of pure one. In conclusion , if the value of recovering is comprehended , the majority of people will admire this activity beside government. Hence, it is necessary to put some efforts to rise recycling by legislating/introducing some rules.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Restoration of Old Buildings, Amir G 2018-10-17T07:17:24+00:00 2018-10-17T07:17:24+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/349-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-07-16/2380-restoration-of-old-buildings-amir-g <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Restoration of Old Buildings, Amir G.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience. Repairing the old structures of large cities demands a great amounts of financial resources. Many strongly hold the idea that instead of renovation of old buildings, we had better spend the public funds on new construction. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary of refurbishment of old building, I personally, believe that maintaining a balance would be the best solution to this contentious topic. Not only does the refurbishment of old buildings retain the cultural roots of city, but it also can boost the economy of an area by attracting the tourists. Many a person especially the middle-aged to senior citizens prefers to see their city as it used to be, appreciating the refurbishment of old building. Those buildings are remember them the good old days of passed days, hence the importance of them to them. Furthermore, although restoration of old building might seem costly, it can compensate the expenses if insulation procedures followed properly. Disappointed of finding a suitable accommodation at economical prices, newly immigrants to metropolitan areas cannot find a reasonable priced place to live if new building are not constructed. In many metropolises big companies are demanding a huge space for their office staff, and only if we expand the urban area vertically can we answer this ever growing request. Furthermore, with the rise of number of people living in large cities new safety instruction has been introduced which are not feasible to comply in the old structure. Should failure to comply with safety regulations in refurbished buildings occur, it will lead to a real disaster. By way of conclusion, I hold the idea that, although renovation of old buildings may seem costly, it profit both the society and the owner from financial and emotional points of view. On the one hand, living in an old building can induce a nostalgia to a large portion of people that they spend a lot of money to spend some nights inside them, and on the other hand the demand of newly safe building in large metropolises is a pressing need.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Restoration of Old Buildings, Amir G.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience. Repairing the old structures of large cities demands a great amounts of financial resources. Many strongly hold the idea that instead of renovation of old buildings, we had better spend the public funds on new construction. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary of refurbishment of old building, I personally, believe that maintaining a balance would be the best solution to this contentious topic. Not only does the refurbishment of old buildings retain the cultural roots of city, but it also can boost the economy of an area by attracting the tourists. Many a person especially the middle-aged to senior citizens prefers to see their city as it used to be, appreciating the refurbishment of old building. Those buildings are remember them the good old days of passed days, hence the importance of them to them. Furthermore, although restoration of old building might seem costly, it can compensate the expenses if insulation procedures followed properly. Disappointed of finding a suitable accommodation at economical prices, newly immigrants to metropolitan areas cannot find a reasonable priced place to live if new building are not constructed. In many metropolises big companies are demanding a huge space for their office staff, and only if we expand the urban area vertically can we answer this ever growing request. Furthermore, with the rise of number of people living in large cities new safety instruction has been introduced which are not feasible to comply in the old structure. Should failure to comply with safety regulations in refurbished buildings occur, it will lead to a real disaster. By way of conclusion, I hold the idea that, although renovation of old buildings may seem costly, it profit both the society and the owner from financial and emotional points of view. On the one hand, living in an old building can induce a nostalgia to a large portion of people that they spend a lot of money to spend some nights inside them, and on the other hand the demand of newly safe building in large metropolises is a pressing need.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Shopping, Mosadegh 2018-10-17T07:17:11+00:00 2018-10-17T07:17:11+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/349-monday-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-monday-97-07-16/2379-shopping-mosadegh <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Shopping, Mosadegh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as hobby. To what extent do you think this is a positive trend? The fact of shopping has changed during the time and reshaped to an entertainment for everyone. Modernization and also industrialization are the more important factor to this change. I believe that these days the act of shopping is not only a simple preparation for people’s daily needs, but also it is the easiest way to have fun and entertain people during their leisure times. By the growing trend of the various industries in the modern days, there is no doubt that the majority of society will tend to follow the latest fashion. This aspect can generalize to the variety of all industries. For instance, clothes, foods, travel, cars, education. A partial of this progress includes the shopping which is an inseparable part of development. People constantly do shopping for their daily needs as some chores and they go shopping as an activity to diminish their stress from daily work, have some activities like watching movie on cinema and a family meal gathering which are almost collected in a large place such as shopping center. Most of the shopping centers have some amusing place for entertaining children. Although this family gathering is a vital need, lavishing money on some unnecessary matters are more thinkable. All individuals should spend their money wisely and on a way without excessive expenditures. Besides, these saying, merely go to shopping puts obstacle in the way of people for participating in a gym or health club. They may neglect to exercise. This has a drawback of going shopping more than normal. In conclusion, however, shopping is recognized as a stress free act, especially for women, it has its negative aspect too. Because it could be an unhealthy habit that can addict people to do. This is inappropriate that these addictedpeople cannot deposit their money for rainy day. If shopping done reasonably, its effect is more beneficiary.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1397/Writing Workshop Monday 97.07.16/Shopping, Mosadegh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as hobby. To what extent do you think this is a positive trend? The fact of shopping has changed during the time and reshaped to an entertainment for everyone. Modernization and also industrialization are the more important factor to this change. I believe that these days the act of shopping is not only a simple preparation for people’s daily needs, but also it is the easiest way to have fun and entertain people during their leisure times. By the growing trend of the various industries in the modern days, there is no doubt that the majority of society will tend to follow the latest fashion. This aspect can generalize to the variety of all industries. For instance, clothes, foods, travel, cars, education. A partial of this progress includes the shopping which is an inseparable part of development. People constantly do shopping for their daily needs as some chores and they go shopping as an activity to diminish their stress from daily work, have some activities like watching movie on cinema and a family meal gathering which are almost collected in a large place such as shopping center. Most of the shopping centers have some amusing place for entertaining children. Although this family gathering is a vital need, lavishing money on some unnecessary matters are more thinkable. All individuals should spend their money wisely and on a way without excessive expenditures. Besides, these saying, merely go to shopping puts obstacle in the way of people for participating in a gym or health club. They may neglect to exercise. This has a drawback of going shopping more than normal. In conclusion, however, shopping is recognized as a stress free act, especially for women, it has its negative aspect too. Because it could be an unhealthy habit that can addict people to do. This is inappropriate that these addictedpeople cannot deposit their money for rainy day. If shopping done reasonably, its effect is more beneficiary.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>