جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that children should be allowed to stay at home and play until they are six or seven years old. Others believe that is important for young children to go to school as soon as possible. What do you think are the advantages of attending school from a young age? There has always been a considerable debate over the topic as to whether of children must stay at home and spend their whole time with their parents and play games till six or seven years old or enrolling to in school at a younger age. My firm conviction is that today's childrenchildren's ability is much higher than before and going gogoesinging to school in at younger ages seems to like a proper choiceselection. In this day and age, preparation of children for their future life is one of the major concerns of parents. Growing in all aspects of life especially communication with other people or peers and learning updated science and technology leads children to have a broaden broader vision for their upcoming life. By enlisting children to in kindergarten or preschool and focusing in on practical training, they can develop their main talents and improve them. On the other hand, nowadays, due to economic and social conditions, both father and mother are forced to have a job to cover their costs and make provide a better life for themselves and their children. Therefore, they will face to serious trouble to take care of their infants when they are not in at home. To conquer to this matter, they are forced to hire a nanny or baby sitter that imposesitter that imposes high expenditure to on family's economy. So it is a logical method to send their children to school to cover both goals: education and keeping children or child care. To sum up, with by considering rapid changes inof the world and huge requirements of new generation besides time limitation of parents, it seems that registration of children at a younger age in school is the best way to support them. By the way, after working hours the parents and children join together again and all the offspring will enjoy both benefits of parents and school simultaneously.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why Is the case? what can be done about this problem? The food crisis, recently, has been one of the most controversial issues discussed amongst the nations and their governments. Since tremendous amount numbers of people, regardless of the progress of the countries which they belonging to, on in different corners of the globe are suffering from the chronic hunger in a circumstance thatat a time when the food industry had has been boosted by modern agriculture. Factors such as population control, equity in food distribution, and the attitude toward the food crisis, may be responsible to eliminate the problem mentioned above. First it is the overgrowing population, especially in unprogressive developing countries, that needs to be strictly controlled. Only by decreasing overpopulation, which is set to have a dispensable significant role in food shortage, can the world hunger stop. Meanwhile, it is not to say that not noa food problem exists in less populated countries, but when it comes to comparison, basically, the more populated the country is, the more problems including food shortage can be witnessed. Secondly, it is equity in distribution of food supplies which guarantees the human access to sufficient food. The amount of food supplies differs nations to nations due to the cultivation resources, soils potential and climate changes of in an area which would widen the gap between the rich and the poorpoverty and affluence in food resources. The last but not the least factor effecting affecting hunger and food insecurity could be the attitude of the governments toward the issue that is currently offered on the basis of charities and voluntary organizations, what is needed to undergo a great change and to be considered as any individual’s right to have sufficient food. Although, the issue has been received a great credit by so many countries, others, in on the contrary, are lagging behind. what is discussed is to say that modern agriculture is not the only effecting deciding factor on malnutrition and food shortage but other elements also needed to come into consideration and receive some changes as well.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In spite of advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem? In recent years noticeable advances have been made in the agricultural field, yet despite such progress there are people still suffering from chronic hunger. The main reasons behind this issue involve poverty and inequity throughout the world that should be addressed by settling efficient mechanisms out. in what follows I will explain more. That hunger is still an indispensible inevitable issue which stems from poverty is a given .That is to say, the less access to the wealth, the more food shortage to be faced with. What is more, the mal maldistribution of crop yields resulted resulting from mismanagement is another factor for nutritious deficiency. To illustrate more, the mishandling in some segments of Africa bring about hardships in basic needs like feeding and sanitarysanitation. Furthermore, each problem has a way to be tackled. For eliminating hunger around the world a deserving individual should be in a position of authority who really cares about meeting the essential needs of deprived ones, otherwise it would be exacerbated day after day. By this I mean a shift is needed from charity-wise activities to efficiently systematic procedures. For example, helping peasants in possessing fruitful fertile terrains and distributing products equally among people carrying out farming by their own efforts are the ways which might help solveing this problem. Therefore, this is not a matter of shortage but rather discrimination. By way of conclusion, by taken taking organized management steps not only will poverty be eradicated and people’s life quality will be grown, but also hunger prevalence will be reduced in a great deal. All in all, individuals’ affordability leads the whole subject to much less of a problem.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

These days when you apply for a job, in application forms they ask you some personal information. Some of them are related to your family and marriage state status and others are about your entertainment or valuable tasksactivity. Such these information shows your personality that helps your colleagues or manager treat you wellin a good way with you. Also managers can choose a more suitable person for that job because they select the one whowhom is more similar with other employees and the company’s rules. Additionally personal information gives an idea to employers as to how likely a choice you are their choice. They may find out how eager and honest you are eager and honest in that position. On the other hand, some employees don’t like to fill answer personal questions. They believe only skills and experiences are important, so they can get the job without personal information. In addition, some of them want to hide their personal issues because they think it is risky and may hurt them or their life. For instance, when divorced people especially women when talk about their failure, some people allow themselves to behave badly. Moreover some hide their personality because they don’t have enough confidence and think true data shows them as a poor person. In conclusion I think personal information for applying for a job is necessary. A successful company has a reasonable obsession in employee selection. They have to pay attention to how employees in a team are similar. Also when an employee have has a problem, they can be more helpful if they know more about him/her. We are not a machine, we are human with our feelings. We need social life,. that is why personal data can help a company have suitable behavior with their employees.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The only way to improve road safety is to impose severe punishment for driving offences. Do you agree? At in recent years, one of the most painful fatalitiesy has beenis due to road accidents. Many of the road accidents are caused by carelessness and negligence of drivers. Many of the drivers are drunk or eat sleep slipspills. On the one hand, governments should consider rigid retribution and strict low laws for offences offending drivers, for example ceasing their driving license and not to let them driveing for some days. There should be monetary fines and imprisonments for drunk drivers. On the other hand, Police should be breaking enforce the traffic rules such as preventing running unfit vehicles, wearing the seat belt, and also traffic system should be modernized. To Conclude, my personal opinion is to educate the people before issuance of the licenses, when someone will knows about every bit of law and keepsing in mind the consequences of violation then there will be least higher chances of performed respecting the law and keeping remaining safetheir life. punishment for driving offences is good way to make the roads safer.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children? Nowadays, learning teaching children is one of the most disputable discussions in the world, especially when it comes to talking about disparity diffrence between right and wrong at an early age. Some people believe that punishment can help for teaching and upbringing bring up children. The others, however, believe children are innocent and adults do not have to blame them due to their behaviours. I agree with the first group but not completely. Although, parents need to punish children sometimes, the type of punishments is really important. For instance, infants always do wrong behaviourmisbehave because they cannot recognize the difference between correct and incorrect, so they want to learn and experience. Moreover, parents have their own ways to nurture kids as well as teachers, but in my opinion the main point is how they react to their faults. In other words, according to some psychologists’ issues studies corporal punishment have has a terrible influence effect on children’s mind and causes some problems in society and their private life in the future. There are lots of diverse punishments suggested which not only they are not harmful but also they encourage children to have positive reaction and also help them to find out their wrong behaviour and change it. For example, adults should convince children with by buying a prize or sometimes saying no to them because children understand that they will not reach anything they want. In conclusion, keeping balance between agreement and disagreement from with children’s requests can lead them to think well and decide wisely. Furthermore, parents’ lifestyle and behaviour are the best example for children which they always pay attention themto, hence thereby building making their characters.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? Managing and how to deal with the waste which has been is produced by houses, and recycling them it has become one of the most important factors on governments agenda during the last 30 years. From some people’s point of view it is people’s responsibility to recycle their own waste, and it is the government’s responsibility to make it a legal requirement. W while there is a party who strongly guard against the idea. The Government itself have has to take care of the wastes, they argue. Unlike two main ideas that have been mentioned, I believe law would have a positive effect on society and imposing it without any doubt would enhance waste recycling. Like it has been effective in many situations such as driving and crime, law would positively affect the matter. On the other hand, there is a must that the government with huge amounts of resources should launch a scheme that can solve the waste problem for good, for instance; the government by investing in infrastructures, by automating the recycling process and building new facilities not only is it going to solve the problems but also it by selling the recycled material, it is going to be beneficialprofitable. To conclude, imposing laws will change public behavior but it is not the answer. If there is a will to find a way to solve the problem once and for all, the government have to take a the lead not people.