جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Childcare training courses should be mandatory for all parents. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples. People have different views about parents attending childcare courses. Whereas some people argue that imposing any compulsory rules on parents is irrational and raises deleterious conflicts in society, it seems to me that parents should be obliged to take part in these classes. On the one hand, some people disagree with enforcing parents to participate in any training that might change their either innate or traditionally shaped abilities for raising their own children. Designed by mainstream schools of thought, these courses might not consider all cultural beliefs among the populace, nor do they ordinarily respect parents’ rights to bring up their children with their own religion. These practices might lead to an unbridgeable gap between parents and authorities, which is obviously not a healthy situation in society, hence greater dissatisfaction. These classes, moreover, come with extortionate costs, which place a financial burden on young parents. While wrestling with prohibitively expensive costs of raising a child, parents are likely to find these costs out of reach. The counterargument to this, however, is that governments can subsidize these classes to make them affordable for all parents. On the other hand, these educational courses can lead to children enjoying superior wellbeing both emotionally and physically. From a psychological point of view, while being in the brain development stage, children, if treated inappropriately, are far more prone to any emotional damages, which might cause cognitive impairment in adolescence; for example, many utterly harmful habits such as resentment or shyness can rightly be the result of parents not knowing how to react to their children’s behaviors. Secondly, children’s health might suffer. Equipped with the latest findings in nutrition which are taught in these courses, parents can feed and raise their children with scientifically proven nutritious-rich foods. Furthermore, having rightly formed diet habits in childhood, they are more likely to have a healthier body with fewer chances of chronic diseases in their adult life. In brief, I understand concede all the arguments against any obligatory childcare courses, yet I believe parents should be compelled to take part in these courses, for the healthier children, by any measure, will contribute more to the society’s prosperity, and governments should not take any chances when it comes to new generation’s health.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Haniyeh Khaksar 6/12/2018 In many Countries, children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion? We can discuss children working in several ways. There are some points in two sides of advantages and disadvantages. For instance, practical learning, poverty, education, enjoying childhood, etc Practical learning is the best positive point for children working. They can accomplish precious experience which it doesn’t exist in school education. I think it will be valuable when it doesn’t stop children from education. They need more impractical education to be an specialist. Another thing that maybe we can count as a positive point is contributing in to the family income when they are poor and need that little income. Additionally working helps children to be independent. On the other hand, The most important negative point in this issue is the that children can’t cannot spend their childhood as a child! They lose their happiness, soul, social plays with their friends and other things. Furthermore, they don’t are not educated as well as an expert person in their major. Besides, education is not only about a major, but rather it includes another items such as teamwork, social relationship, problem-solving problems skills, etc. They can learn these things without too much stress in a suitable environment.2 In my opinion, engaging children in a paid work is not acceptable but I think they can do some practical works as internship. It will be useful and enjoyable for them.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Do good exam results at school or college guarantee success in life? Discuss. Do you believe that studying hard will bring a better life? It is a justifiable to say that academic achievement does not influence on receiving achieving a successful life in the future. However, beneficial benefits of good grades would not be not remarkable.in the same way, it is hard to find a strong link between a studying hard and engaging in the a sound lifestyle on condition that you can review thea life history of many people who left at school and went on to achieve great things. Although, obtaining acceptable marks and studying hard are considered the best way to secure a good job a and following the a perfect life, but it is not a certainly true in all cases. In on the first level, it is better to identify a clear definition of success on the grounds that any one has an individual view about an ideal life, so this essay cavers covers the fringe benefits in as a result of passing exams with great grades to meet lead athe superb life.it is obvious that providing a best condition in life are is derived from several factors. For instance, besides trying to access reasonable results in theoretical exams through working hard , people should enroll on in extracurricular activities to gain practical qualifications which help them secure an appropriate, well-paid career with well-paid in order to catch up with their needs for making the an ideal life. Moreover, they should update their skills and intellectual knowledge frequently if they are enough interested enough to increase their promotions. All reasons do not stop here, sometimes people claim that a perfect lifestyle means responding to other demands such as job satisfaction or security in thea workplace and so on. These arguments are true but not in all cases and there is not enough evidence which that exam results have significant impact on items above. In the next level, there is more to life than work and money, so it is important to make balance between life and work. Too much studying and spending a lot of time on working are ledlead to serious social problems especially in terms of communication. In addition, working hard with the aim of rising raising general knowledge and cognitive competence or even studying consistently to be professional in a specific file, all of which cannot guarantee to maintaining the an ideal life unless people can exert their capabilities in practical in business areas to touch fulfill their purpose regarding in achievement of a better life. In total, although there are a great deal ofnumerous definitions about the a successful life but no one can support provide sufficient evidence that good exam marks and hard studying are considered key items rather than other factors to gain the a better life..

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many countries want to host international sports events, while other countries think that hosting sports events has more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Since a century ago, athletic events have had an important role for in gathering people together throughout the world. So that, thanks to all-popular the crowd-pleasures of such games many countries are interested in to hosting these sports tournaments. However, other countries are opposed and believe that the negative impacts of holding such matches in a country overweight outweigh its it’s pros. In the following paragraphs I am going to compare both views. On the one hand, advocates are of this opinion that when your country is the host of such international games, a large numbers of individuals from all over the world will come to watch the competitions. As a result, the businesses would be flourished during this period of time. In other words, not only big stores, but also rather vendors will earn up to three fold more than their average income. Moreover, it is a proper way to advertise the touristm attractions of your country to foreigners. Therefore, it brings about more tourism in near-future to for the country. In addition, by broadcasting the rights of such international matches, the government would be benefited from millions of dollars and such a great income would be spent on country development. On the other hand, the opponents claim that it is true that holding such universal athletic events will inject a lot of money to the country. But, we should note that it has some expenses too. For instance, the expenses are related to accommodating sportsmen in hotels, their meals as well as their transportation. Furthermore, when in a short time, a large numbers of people come to a city, it leads to some irregularities such as traffic congestion as well as disorders in the public transportation system. Moreover, during the holding time ofwhile such world- wide competitions are running, the possibility of terrorist attacks will be boosted. In my opinion, such a great benefits of hosting global sports events are obvious, of course we cannot deny some probable consequences either. But, the negative points are not enough persuasive enough to prevent a country holding such international matches. To sum up, governments by imposing district rigid/strict laws during the time of tournaments in the city as well as proper procurement could be benefited from the advantages of hosting these competitions.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? Seeming to be a must of our today’s lives, no longer is knowing two tongues considered an ability. However, while “the older you are, the harder it is” is an obviously inevitable fact, at what age it is the easiest and most beneficial to know it should be taken into account. On the one hand, many argue that kids should not be involved into some complicated learnings lessons like second language since their schedule is already full and hectic enough. Additionally, hardly can it guarantee to end up with to which what is expected, and maybe just be a waste of time wasting, when they need to live as a child. It is more than essential for them to spend their time on playing with their peers and exploring the world around them rather than sitting in a class and listening to a teacher. Furthermore, conflicting with their mother tongue is another concern over this. Therefore, not only may they be stuck in an critically complicated situation with their main language, but also others may make fun of them, and subsequently lose their self-confidence and selfesteem. On the other hand, kids can pick a new language as easily as they learn to walk by virtue of their innate ability. Their mind can effortlessly handle it, whilst some people believe that being bilingual at a young age can have some worryingly deleterious effects on their first tongue. Moreover, the habits of pronunciation and grammar of their primary one is less deeply ingrained and thus easier to overcome. Another benefit of knowing another language is paving the way for learning others, thereby mastering the new one with less difficulty/without any of difficulties which unlearnt uneducated people struggle with. Consequently, quite simply learning is in children’s nature and their capacity of acquiring a knowledge diminishes over their lives. Thus, whereas speaking a second tongue, irrespective of whether it is as the global lingua franca or not, can help them to pick another one more easily in future, is it a reasonable decision to deny children benefiting from this naturally powerful feature?

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Governments nowadays are dealing with boosting the infrastructure concerning transportation modes. A subject of remaining debate has been created over investment on in railways instead of roads as means of transportation. In my opinion, railway expansion can bring suitable benefits for governments from multiple points of view. First of all, railway transportation is efficiently dependable. No matter what the weather condition is, whether it is rainy, snowy, foggy, …, the this transportation still works, which means how reliable and proper railways are. Consequently, there would be no little delay and congestion on railway routes and the schedules are as accurate and exact as planned. The loads/cargos and passengers are also delivered to the destination as fast and conveniently as possible, hence high customer satisfaction (is met) in long term. Railways have other superiorities over roads. They can guarantee and ensure safety of passengers and goods. To explain, this means of transport minimizes the chances of accidents as there will be no traffic or unexpected vehicles on the opposite side of the route,. therefore, large numbers of people and goods can be carried safely. Moreover, railways preserve their loads against the sun, rain, and other weather harshness and their adverse impacts especially when the cargo is sensitive to weather conditions, thereby improving the safety of traveling. To conclude, it seems that railways far outweigh roads from different perspectives, in a way that not only are they reliable enough but safety and ease of transportation is satisfied effectively.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

​​​Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing. While others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views. ​​ Human beings have ​been​ always ​seeking professional workforce to advance their goals. Therefore, training and engaging children in work at their early ages have been one of the most ancient traditions in many nations. In the last century some countries have begun to break with tradition by adopting laws protecting teenagers. While others agree on the part-time presence of them in workplaces. Most nations who are of the opinion that working of children is benefictial believe that they help countries’ economy. In addition, children develop their skills and achieve their potential while they learn how to save their money and manage their budget. Working along with studying also provides the environment in which a child is trained to manage his/her time and avoids wasting time. In contrast to this view, working as a child has been condemned as an attack on child lawdecency by many countries. By way of illustration, youngsters may be abused in many situations, particularly in paying less money than they deserve. Besides, how could a child enjoy his/her childhood when ​​there is no time for it? These countries generally give the first priority to the education of teenagers and stimulate their personal and social growth. In conclusion, it’s clear that this is not as straightforward as it appears. Although there are drawbacks which were mentioned above, some people persuade children to decide for themselves whether they will be able to work as well as they study or not. No matter how government​s​ deal with this issue, it is parents who are the first and last reference who should be referred to.​

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

​​​Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. The majority of people around the world are so much concerned about their career life. There are two kinds of individuals who whether either prefer working in the same company for lifelong or alter change jobs variety of organizations to seek [-seeking?] new opportunities. In what follows I will expand more about these points of views. First of all, I am going to claim the significant merit of changing workplaces. That is to say if you are the person who probes for new corporations, you would possibly meet new chances you won’t regret for; such kind of person takes the risk of new and bigger challenges that will make him more experienced and professional. The one would also identify his one’s concealed potentials and get progressesed far more. For example, if you are a teacher by switching new institutes you will be familiar with new methods and a whole system in managing that leads you to thinking wider. Secondly, although folks people who try to change their work place [folks changing their workplace?] are more plausible to be faced with difficulties that they should deal with, and they would be more expert in their majored field which leads to their wages them escalating wages and perks. Therefore, the more new experiences you have, the more benefits you’ll get. On the other hand, some individuals are more conservative who prefer to retain remain in the constant company during their lifespan. Although sticking to an organization would guarantee a stable career life, you would feel to be in monotonous state that may result in paling inspiration . so, by staying in the safe zone you may endanger your interest toward the a professional life. In conclusion, however a constant and fixed is a position is a situation in the safe zone, it worth far less than working in different places. As it is obviousobviously, I advocate a more challengingeable but progressive professional life than a monotonous one.​

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It is true that supermarkets are growing incrementally and also becoming popular among most of the citizens rapidly. Furthermore, their rapid expansion have has affected the whole pattern of the market. Opinions diverge on whether this trend will demolish local markets or does will not affect it them seriously. Some people argue that local markets are not going to be vanished since (they) have their own tradition on selecting specific commodities to sell,on at the other hand, aged people tend to shop from small markets which they have purchased at since past time and they have still remained loyal to them. So this the above-mentioned following reasons will help local businesses to revive survive through the enormous rise of supermarkets. Although this point of view belongs to least few people, there are strong grounds that should be considered as well. In from another point of view, extreme growth of supermarkets will topple the existence of local markets as the supermarkets provide people with more comfort area and also trustworthy shopping. Supermarket authorities have imposed strict rules about quality and prices so that shoppers find good quality products at reasonable prices. Moreover, they provide daily offers and discount to absorb more customers. Recently the idea about shopping has changed and turned into an entertainment which makes people happier. Because of this, supermarkets are magnificent places for people to spend quality time. For instance, there are a variety of researches which have been conducted in developed countries showinged that 90 percent of people prefer to purchase their needs from huge supermarkets. Considering all the facts above, it is rational to conclude that local markets will fade away after years. More people prefer purchasing their essentials from immense supermarkets since they provide a variety of products with better prices and offers.​

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It is true that supermarkets are growing incrementally and also becoming popular among most of the citizens rapidly. Furthermore, their rapid expansion have has affected the whole pattern of the market. Opinions diverge on whether this trend will demolish local markets or does will not affect it them seriously. Some people argue that local markets are not going to be vanished since (they) have their own tradition on selecting specific commodities to sell,on at the other hand, aged people tend to shop from small markets which they have purchased at since past time and they have still remained loyal to them. So this the above-mentioned following reasons will help local businesses to revive survive through the enormous rise of supermarkets. Although this point of view belongs to least few people, there are strong grounds that should be considered as well. In from another point of view, extreme growth of supermarkets will topple the existence of local markets as the supermarkets provide people with more comfort area and also trustworthy shopping. Supermarket authorities have imposed strict rules about quality and prices so that shoppers find good quality products at reasonable prices. Moreover, they provide daily offers and discount to absorb more customers. Recently the idea about shopping has changed and turned into an entertainment which makes people happier. Because of this, supermarkets are magnificent places for people to spend quality time. For instance, there are a variety of researches which have been conducted in developed countries showinged that 90 percent of people prefer to purchase their needs from huge supermarkets. Considering all the facts above, it is rational to conclude that local markets will fade away after years. More people prefer purchasing their essentials from immense supermarkets since they provide a variety of products with better prices and offers.​