Mondays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/287-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-11-23 2024-05-05T03:55:03+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Arts, Amir 2018-02-12T19:29:45+00:00 2018-02-12T19:29:45+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/287-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-11-23/1777-arts-amir <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.11.23/Arts, Amir.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spend elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view? Arts sometimes reflect the heritage of a country and depict the creativity of individuals in a certain era. While many believe (that) financing in arts is a wastage of money, I believe the benefits it far outweigh its drawbacks. This essay elaborates on the benefits/merits of spending money on arts from the national budget, and consequencests of diverting this small portion to other sections. I am on of the opinion that all people benefit from arts, and even those who claim (that) they do not like any kind of arts are suppressing a natural part of their emotions. I think arts play an important role in in many aspects of our lives, so not only do I disagree with reduction of the fund dedicated on to this area arts, but also I think governments have to increase its their support to art and artists. Despite the undeniable fact that arts can be dangerous for a specific group of people such as those who do the drugs to create more attractive works, I think a most of us have benefited from arts. Equivalently equally importantly, funding the art can support the ones who are gifted, but cannot afford to follow their talent. There are some good examples in my country, Iran, where many talented superstars grew with supports of governmental aids. One of them for example is a pop singer called Ebi who was discovered and trained by a specific program by public budget. By the way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that I do agree with funding the arts because of its their direct and indirect impacts on society. I would like to draw the attention of those who insist on directing the art budget to other sections that in most cases the amount of money spent on arts is not considerable comparable with than other sections, so this cutting this small portion of money does not have a considerable effect on other sections.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.11.23/Arts, Amir.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spend elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view? Arts sometimes reflect the heritage of a country and depict the creativity of individuals in a certain era. While many believe (that) financing in arts is a wastage of money, I believe the benefits it far outweigh its drawbacks. This essay elaborates on the benefits/merits of spending money on arts from the national budget, and consequencests of diverting this small portion to other sections. I am on of the opinion that all people benefit from arts, and even those who claim (that) they do not like any kind of arts are suppressing a natural part of their emotions. I think arts play an important role in in many aspects of our lives, so not only do I disagree with reduction of the fund dedicated on to this area arts, but also I think governments have to increase its their support to art and artists. Despite the undeniable fact that arts can be dangerous for a specific group of people such as those who do the drugs to create more attractive works, I think a most of us have benefited from arts. Equivalently equally importantly, funding the art can support the ones who are gifted, but cannot afford to follow their talent. There are some good examples in my country, Iran, where many talented superstars grew with supports of governmental aids. One of them for example is a pop singer called Ebi who was discovered and trained by a specific program by public budget. By the way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that I do agree with funding the arts because of its their direct and indirect impacts on society. I would like to draw the attention of those who insist on directing the art budget to other sections that in most cases the amount of money spent on arts is not considerable comparable with than other sections, so this cutting this small portion of money does not have a considerable effect on other sections.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Cigarette, Sahar Modirzadeh 2018-02-12T19:29:24+00:00 2018-02-12T19:29:24+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/287-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-11-23/1776-cigarette-sahar-modirzadeh <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.11.23/Cigarette, Sahar Modirzadeh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some businesses now say that no one can smoke cigarettes in any of their offices. Some governments have banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer. I strongly support the rules and regulations legislated by government and organizations to protect the environment and people's health. In this case, the banning of smoking in public areas seems completely justifiable due to many reasons; however, it would be more acceptable and democratic if the smokers' right was were reserved as well in a way. As a non-smoker, I believe one of the best laws that must be strictly enforced in every public zone is forbidding smoking because it is really irritating to be exposed to smoke produced by cigarettes especially indoors. It is specifically harmful for people suffering from heart and respiratory diseases. Therefore, it is totally reasonable to ban it in the places where both smokers and non-smokers attend. Moreover, generally, limiting smoking will help preserve the environment from pollution. On the other hand, practiceding by many companies these days, the best solution lies in providing some special locations for smokers who are allowed to smoke only in those designated areas. It is also very/quite common in public places like restaurants, cinemas, hospitals and many other places to separate smoking and non-smoking areas; then it in is on people to who choose where they like to sit or attend. Thus, people's freedom won't be taken by no means. All in all, I think governments or rulers should consider everyone's right and different tastes or preferences and try to respect and meet all of them to the extent that public rights are reserved. No doubt, such approach leads to a more democratic society.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.11.23/Cigarette, Sahar Modirzadeh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some businesses now say that no one can smoke cigarettes in any of their offices. Some governments have banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer. I strongly support the rules and regulations legislated by government and organizations to protect the environment and people's health. In this case, the banning of smoking in public areas seems completely justifiable due to many reasons; however, it would be more acceptable and democratic if the smokers' right was were reserved as well in a way. As a non-smoker, I believe one of the best laws that must be strictly enforced in every public zone is forbidding smoking because it is really irritating to be exposed to smoke produced by cigarettes especially indoors. It is specifically harmful for people suffering from heart and respiratory diseases. Therefore, it is totally reasonable to ban it in the places where both smokers and non-smokers attend. Moreover, generally, limiting smoking will help preserve the environment from pollution. On the other hand, practiceding by many companies these days, the best solution lies in providing some special locations for smokers who are allowed to smoke only in those designated areas. It is also very/quite common in public places like restaurants, cinemas, hospitals and many other places to separate smoking and non-smoking areas; then it in is on people to who choose where they like to sit or attend. Thus, people's freedom won't be taken by no means. All in all, I think governments or rulers should consider everyone's right and different tastes or preferences and try to respect and meet all of them to the extent that public rights are reserved. No doubt, such approach leads to a more democratic society.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Duration of Holding a Job, Ali Khaleghifard 2018-02-12T19:29:04+00:00 2018-02-12T19:29:04+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/287-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-11-23/1775-duration-of-holding-a-job-ali-khaleghifard <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.11.23/Duration of Holding a Job, Ali Khaleghifard.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Among the workforce, irrespective of their age and profession, holding a job and working in a specific workplace for a long time is part of their workstyle, in hopes of/owing to fulfilling their ambition of reaching the summit of their career. However, with the pace of technological developments, no longer is having a job for life not welcome by in the group of some workers, due to causing their knowledge to be obsolete. On the one hand, many employees argue that staying in their companies for very long can help them to earn more money in next years of their employments, even if they do not have any improvement in their job. Therefore, income should be taken into consideration as one of the main factors of this decision, whereas changing the workplace can leave them trailing behind other workforce who are staying longer in the a company. Moreover, they can be known as a veteran in the organisation when they spend more time on the a fixed job and facing its related problems and finding solutions for them, so not only can it (working in same place) direct them toward seniority and climbing the promotion ladder, but also it can boost their future earning potential. On the other hand, some people strongly believe that if did they do not change their workplace, becoming fossil in their job would will be an inevitably imminent incident, thereby damaging their job satisfaction and self-confidence. Thus, they will be always in a doubt whether they can be able to be hired in another corporation when a critically important situation, such as the company's worst financial nightmare, comes true. Furthermore, being confineding in an organisation can deny them the benefit of exposure to various experiences which are integrated in others, and. And also it can lead to being fed up with dealing with one kind of tasks, although they are expert in doing them. Consequently, whilst going overboard on changing jobs is not quite reasonable, sticking with it and sacrificing both the will of learning new knowledge and the joy of experiencing fresh challenges, arguably, seems not to be a sensible determination.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.11.23/Duration of Holding a Job, Ali Khaleghifard.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Among the workforce, irrespective of their age and profession, holding a job and working in a specific workplace for a long time is part of their workstyle, in hopes of/owing to fulfilling their ambition of reaching the summit of their career. However, with the pace of technological developments, no longer is having a job for life not welcome by in the group of some workers, due to causing their knowledge to be obsolete. On the one hand, many employees argue that staying in their companies for very long can help them to earn more money in next years of their employments, even if they do not have any improvement in their job. Therefore, income should be taken into consideration as one of the main factors of this decision, whereas changing the workplace can leave them trailing behind other workforce who are staying longer in the a company. Moreover, they can be known as a veteran in the organisation when they spend more time on the a fixed job and facing its related problems and finding solutions for them, so not only can it (working in same place) direct them toward seniority and climbing the promotion ladder, but also it can boost their future earning potential. On the other hand, some people strongly believe that if did they do not change their workplace, becoming fossil in their job would will be an inevitably imminent incident, thereby damaging their job satisfaction and self-confidence. Thus, they will be always in a doubt whether they can be able to be hired in another corporation when a critically important situation, such as the company's worst financial nightmare, comes true. Furthermore, being confineding in an organisation can deny them the benefit of exposure to various experiences which are integrated in others, and. And also it can lead to being fed up with dealing with one kind of tasks, although they are expert in doing them. Consequently, whilst going overboard on changing jobs is not quite reasonable, sticking with it and sacrificing both the will of learning new knowledge and the joy of experiencing fresh challenges, arguably, seems not to be a sensible determination.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Sports, Hamidreza Ghanbari 2018-02-12T19:28:39+00:00 2018-02-12T19:28:39+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/287-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-11-23/1774-sports-hamidreza-ghanbari <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.11.23/Sports, Hamidreza Ghanbari.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams, e.g. football. However, some people think it is more beneficial to play individual sports, e.g. tennis and swimming. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. You cannot Finding an orthopedist or a physical therapist who says sport is not invaluable useful for health. Whereas almost all kinds of sports could act be more useful than harmful, some people tend to participate in team sports, and some prefer individual ones. To some people, the advantages of team sports easily outweighs individual sports on account of enhancing the ability in work as a team. They claim that when a person has been playing this kind of sports since they are children, this would advance him to be accomplished in the potential future job opportunity. On the other hand, the other group argue that individual sports will accentuate the sense of the independency in one who plays these sports. Although success in an individual sport involves a motivational team behind the scene as well as courage, a victory will not be achieved but when the athlete rely relies on his spiritualspirit, and his own stamina. On the other side of the coin is that, should mistakes be made in team sports, it would let the teammates down. If a goal keeper, for example, accept concedes a goal by fault, this would will make the whole team disappointed, and discouraged them, and ultimately leading them to lose the game. This sympathy and guilty feeling is are much worse than when an individual sportsman man makes a mistake and loses a game. Given that, the player who made the mistake would consider the feasible failure caused by himself, and his teammates will would barely trust him again. Nonetheless people who have tendency to do team sports believe that this sort of sports stand a higher chance for of being successful, as many hands make light work, and few mistakes could be failed to take into accountignored, and it is more possible to recover and overcome these obstacles. In general, taking part in team sports is more beneficial than individual ones, since it involves teamwork, thus lays the groundwork for the development of the practitioner's social skills.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.11.23/Sports, Hamidreza Ghanbari.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams, e.g. football. However, some people think it is more beneficial to play individual sports, e.g. tennis and swimming. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. You cannot Finding an orthopedist or a physical therapist who says sport is not invaluable useful for health. Whereas almost all kinds of sports could act be more useful than harmful, some people tend to participate in team sports, and some prefer individual ones. To some people, the advantages of team sports easily outweighs individual sports on account of enhancing the ability in work as a team. They claim that when a person has been playing this kind of sports since they are children, this would advance him to be accomplished in the potential future job opportunity. On the other hand, the other group argue that individual sports will accentuate the sense of the independency in one who plays these sports. Although success in an individual sport involves a motivational team behind the scene as well as courage, a victory will not be achieved but when the athlete rely relies on his spiritualspirit, and his own stamina. On the other side of the coin is that, should mistakes be made in team sports, it would let the teammates down. If a goal keeper, for example, accept concedes a goal by fault, this would will make the whole team disappointed, and discouraged them, and ultimately leading them to lose the game. This sympathy and guilty feeling is are much worse than when an individual sportsman man makes a mistake and loses a game. Given that, the player who made the mistake would consider the feasible failure caused by himself, and his teammates will would barely trust him again. Nonetheless people who have tendency to do team sports believe that this sort of sports stand a higher chance for of being successful, as many hands make light work, and few mistakes could be failed to take into accountignored, and it is more possible to recover and overcome these obstacles. In general, taking part in team sports is more beneficial than individual ones, since it involves teamwork, thus lays the groundwork for the development of the practitioner's social skills.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>