Mondays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/267-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-09-13 2024-04-29T20:06:15+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Admission Charges for Museums 2017-12-06T10:32:59+00:00 2017-12-06T10:32:59+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/267-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-09-13/1667-admission-charges-for-museums <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.09.13/Admission Charges for Museums.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many museums charge for admissions while many of them are free. Yet, there remains some disagreements as to whether it is disadvantage or not for museums to charge for admission, in this paper I would argue that museums should not charge for admission and of course it should be free. My reasons are twofold. First of all, I believe it is vitally important that everyone can enter museums for free and enjoy the greatness and beauty of art and history. Visiting museums is not a onetime entertainment, after times of visiting the place one can understand the deepest concepts of art. Museums are quite valuable historical buildings with many executive objects in it which have salient effects on the culture of a nation. Thus everyone visiting museums can have such influences in their lives, for example if one cannot afford to take their children to artistic places like museums, children may not find their joy and excitement toward art and might want to become an artist. Many people think if museums are free there would not be enough budget to take a constant care of museums and to cover the maintenance expenditures, but I think museums should be funded by the government or charity for such expenses. Secondly, I believe if museums are free, more tourists would be interested to visit and experience the history of the country, they later would talk about it on pages like Instagram and telegram so it will attract more tourists to the place. If the number of tourists increase in one country, more money would be injected into economy and they will also learn about the culture and history of the country. By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that museums should be free of charge, it would eventually be superb for the country and its people in any way we think. The annual budget of museums to run and maintain it should be provided by the government.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.09.13/Admission Charges for Museums.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many museums charge for admissions while many of them are free. Yet, there remains some disagreements as to whether it is disadvantage or not for museums to charge for admission, in this paper I would argue that museums should not charge for admission and of course it should be free. My reasons are twofold. First of all, I believe it is vitally important that everyone can enter museums for free and enjoy the greatness and beauty of art and history. Visiting museums is not a onetime entertainment, after times of visiting the place one can understand the deepest concepts of art. Museums are quite valuable historical buildings with many executive objects in it which have salient effects on the culture of a nation. Thus everyone visiting museums can have such influences in their lives, for example if one cannot afford to take their children to artistic places like museums, children may not find their joy and excitement toward art and might want to become an artist. Many people think if museums are free there would not be enough budget to take a constant care of museums and to cover the maintenance expenditures, but I think museums should be funded by the government or charity for such expenses. Secondly, I believe if museums are free, more tourists would be interested to visit and experience the history of the country, they later would talk about it on pages like Instagram and telegram so it will attract more tourists to the place. If the number of tourists increase in one country, more money would be injected into economy and they will also learn about the culture and history of the country. By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that museums should be free of charge, it would eventually be superb for the country and its people in any way we think. The annual budget of museums to run and maintain it should be provided by the government.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Bulding Homes in Countryside, Ahmad Jalali 2017-12-06T10:32:47+00:00 2017-12-06T10:32:47+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/267-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-09-13/1666-bulding-homes-in-countryside-ahmad-jalali <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.09.13/Bulding Homes in Countryside, Ahmad Jalali.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this? In the past decades, the needed facilities for living and life expectancy hope for living among human beings has been increasing, hence the growth of the population. As a result, we require more houses to put a roof over above people's head. One answer to this problem could be building new houses in the countryside. Although, this solution has its own disadvantages, I believe that it is a better response to our problem. The first negative side of expanding cities is by raising the number of the residents of the cities, we will face troubles such as pollution therein those. Noise pollution and air pollution has already been a problem in large cities and it seems like helping to make more contamination if we put more people in them. On the other hand, not only can we distribute and decentralize the population, but also we can prepare an undoubtedly favorable situation to bring more provisions to our rural area, if we guide our citizens to live in the countryside. There always has always been some critique criticism that our villages are not well equipped. But when more people are living there, the government would be convinced to assign more budget for there. Therefore, it would be easier for our villages to grow. Unfortunately, if we make our countryside larger, there would be some consequences like harming the nature. Whenever the humans put set their foot in an untouched/pristine nature, they ruin it to create a livable situation for themselves. The more populated a place becomes, the more damages we cause. On in conclusion, by constructing new houses in rural areas we can prevent from more pollution in metropolises and also it would be an opportunity to equip our villages. However, there would be some harms to the nature. So, we should make our best effort to respect the nature we are living in and keep it safe and sound.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.09.13/Bulding Homes in Countryside, Ahmad Jalali.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this? In the past decades, the needed facilities for living and life expectancy hope for living among human beings has been increasing, hence the growth of the population. As a result, we require more houses to put a roof over above people's head. One answer to this problem could be building new houses in the countryside. Although, this solution has its own disadvantages, I believe that it is a better response to our problem. The first negative side of expanding cities is by raising the number of the residents of the cities, we will face troubles such as pollution therein those. Noise pollution and air pollution has already been a problem in large cities and it seems like helping to make more contamination if we put more people in them. On the other hand, not only can we distribute and decentralize the population, but also we can prepare an undoubtedly favorable situation to bring more provisions to our rural area, if we guide our citizens to live in the countryside. There always has always been some critique criticism that our villages are not well equipped. But when more people are living there, the government would be convinced to assign more budget for there. Therefore, it would be easier for our villages to grow. Unfortunately, if we make our countryside larger, there would be some consequences like harming the nature. Whenever the humans put set their foot in an untouched/pristine nature, they ruin it to create a livable situation for themselves. The more populated a place becomes, the more damages we cause. On in conclusion, by constructing new houses in rural areas we can prevent from more pollution in metropolises and also it would be an opportunity to equip our villages. However, there would be some harms to the nature. So, we should make our best effort to respect the nature we are living in and keep it safe and sound.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Railways 2017-12-06T10:32:33+00:00 2017-12-06T10:32:33+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/267-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-09-13/1665-railways <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.09.13/Railways.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. These days, many countries have focused on erecting new railway lines in order to facilitate ing commuting not only for their citizens, also for smoothing the way for transferring with the aim of merchandizing (marketing). Some believe that the government should much invest money on in reconstructing the oldfashioned public transport system. From my point of view, with regard of to public transport importance and its role in secure transfer, it is better to renovate ing the outdated one. There is no doubt that railway lines provide easier accessibility to the remotest areas. Developing industriesy requires easy access to the region which is known as a potential of industrialization. What is more, human voracious appetite to achieve oil-rich areas and decipher explore/discover the affluent mines leads to establishing the new way lines. Moreover, the time traveling to reach the destination (home or work) would will be reduced, if the new rail way line is constructed. The main point that should be noticed is on the subject of detrimental aspects of developing railway on the environment. Developing the railway demands smoothing a bumpy (rugged) route, which has adverse impact on animal and plant species. Recent decades, we have witnessed destroying destruction of the a large number of invaluable animals, so as to knock down their territory.Another significant point is that public transport in any country is made with the purpose of chopping down the inhabitants' life cost. Furthermore, public transport plays a great role in cutting down the throng overcrowding (mob) in metropolitan cities. The more public transport availability, the lower congestion. In conclusion, from my prospective the state should rectify the old onetransport system, consequently, not only can we boost the health state of the community, also it has a supreme influence on decreasing the volume of traffic as well.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.09.13/Railways.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. These days, many countries have focused on erecting new railway lines in order to facilitate ing commuting not only for their citizens, also for smoothing the way for transferring with the aim of merchandizing (marketing). Some believe that the government should much invest money on in reconstructing the oldfashioned public transport system. From my point of view, with regard of to public transport importance and its role in secure transfer, it is better to renovate ing the outdated one. There is no doubt that railway lines provide easier accessibility to the remotest areas. Developing industriesy requires easy access to the region which is known as a potential of industrialization. What is more, human voracious appetite to achieve oil-rich areas and decipher explore/discover the affluent mines leads to establishing the new way lines. Moreover, the time traveling to reach the destination (home or work) would will be reduced, if the new rail way line is constructed. The main point that should be noticed is on the subject of detrimental aspects of developing railway on the environment. Developing the railway demands smoothing a bumpy (rugged) route, which has adverse impact on animal and plant species. Recent decades, we have witnessed destroying destruction of the a large number of invaluable animals, so as to knock down their territory.Another significant point is that public transport in any country is made with the purpose of chopping down the inhabitants' life cost. Furthermore, public transport plays a great role in cutting down the throng overcrowding (mob) in metropolitan cities. The more public transport availability, the lower congestion. In conclusion, from my prospective the state should rectify the old onetransport system, consequently, not only can we boost the health state of the community, also it has a supreme influence on decreasing the volume of traffic as well.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Technology and Relationships 2017-12-06T10:32:19+00:00 2017-12-06T10:32:19+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/mondays/267-monday-writing-workshop-1396/writing-workshop-monday-96-09-13/1664-technology-and-relationships <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.09.13/Technology and Relationships.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? These days, the improvement of technology has substantially influenced the relationships among the people and the question of whether this change has any advantages and disadvantages or not has emerged as one of the most discussed issues of the modern era. In this essay, I will explore some of the merits and demerits of these newly modern relationships before giving my opinion on this subject. One of the most cited useful points of this fact is that it has mostly faded caused distances in relationships to fade. In other words, before, when a person emigrated from his home country, not only could not he not see his friends and relatives any more, but also he could not even speak with them,. Therefore, he could not contact them unless by sending some letters, which could sometimes take a months to arrive to at its destination. But nowadays, as long as the access of the internet is provided, people could can contact each other through a different applications on their cellphones, by both audio and video calls, no matter how far they are from each other. Moreover, before/previously, making a call to abroad was so expensive and not everyone could afford it, but today, by just connecting to the internet you can call wherever you want without any extra charges. On the other hand, the easiness of using the internet and having video calls, has made people lazy in to meeting each other and having face to face conversation. Day by day they rely more on distance relationships, consequently they become more isolated, hence many types of depressions. Furthermore, through these fake relationships, many hackers misuse this these facilities to seduce others and abuse their feelings and properties. The main conclusion to be drawn from this discussion is that, although the recent high level of technology has made relationships much easier, people must pay attention not to not forget the main requirement of any humanwhich is being in the real society and communicate with others, otherwise they would face many mental problems.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Mondays/1396/Writing Workshop Monday 96.09.13/Technology and Relationships.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? These days, the improvement of technology has substantially influenced the relationships among the people and the question of whether this change has any advantages and disadvantages or not has emerged as one of the most discussed issues of the modern era. In this essay, I will explore some of the merits and demerits of these newly modern relationships before giving my opinion on this subject. One of the most cited useful points of this fact is that it has mostly faded caused distances in relationships to fade. In other words, before, when a person emigrated from his home country, not only could not he not see his friends and relatives any more, but also he could not even speak with them,. Therefore, he could not contact them unless by sending some letters, which could sometimes take a months to arrive to at its destination. But nowadays, as long as the access of the internet is provided, people could can contact each other through a different applications on their cellphones, by both audio and video calls, no matter how far they are from each other. Moreover, before/previously, making a call to abroad was so expensive and not everyone could afford it, but today, by just connecting to the internet you can call wherever you want without any extra charges. On the other hand, the easiness of using the internet and having video calls, has made people lazy in to meeting each other and having face to face conversation. Day by day they rely more on distance relationships, consequently they become more isolated, hence many types of depressions. Furthermore, through these fake relationships, many hackers misuse this these facilities to seduce others and abuse their feelings and properties. The main conclusion to be drawn from this discussion is that, although the recent high level of technology has made relationships much easier, people must pay attention not to not forget the main requirement of any humanwhich is being in the real society and communicate with others, otherwise they would face many mental problems.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>