جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

As countries develop, more and more people buy and use their own cars. Do the advantages for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment? In recent years, there is a big controversy surrounding the issue about/as to whether the favorable features of consumption of a large number of cars for individuals in developed countries could overshadow detrimental effects of them on the environments or not. I believe that using more cars in developed countries could have an array of merits for users although its catastrophic results on the Earth would be more than its benefits. It is universally accepted that with the increasing increase inof the number of cars in streets, on the one hand, could lead to several dire consequences for our the planet. The most significant of its impacts would be the percentage of exhausted fumes would raiserise, so people will would witness a cloud of air pollution in the sky of cities. This would mean that not only might our environments be put under severe tension but also ecosystems would be upset. In doing so, in the long run it results in people who live in these countries suffering from some diseases which are include asthma, diabetes, and respiratory complications, just to name a few. It is true that buying vehicles, however, could have some advantages for those who use their cars. The most obvious benefit could be that they commute to their workplace without standing in a long queue of some public transport. This is because they would leave their offices or homes at their convenient time when the traffic is less. If so, they feel comfortable and such a condition would provide them with an opportunity to have a better performance at their workplaces. With aforesaid explanations, gradually, people would find themselves calm and patient in their society. To sum up, regarding the debate surrounding the plus points of using more cars in developed countries would outnumbering the drawbacks effects of them on the environments, I suppose it could not outweigh the fiascos immense impacts on the environments. From my point of view, a trade-off between both the number of cars that people use and control of the air quality would be essential to be considered in the developed countries.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Handwriting today is less formal than it was in the past. What are the causes of this change? Is it a positive or negative development? Over recent decades, people have changed the ways of written communication and replaced substitute machine type forinstead of using their own hands to transfer information. There are several causes behind this replacement. The question that arises is whether this change brings more advantages or disadvantages. Admittedly, advances in technology have likely contributed to a prelude of a revolution in written communication among all people. In other words, our ancestors used to write a letter in order to inform or ask about varied subjects. Whereas, now, the computer’s text is altered to the old-fashioned one by the world’s citizenry. Furthermore, heavy maintain maintenace costs of written official letters may be cited as the other reason why people have changed their tendency to utilize email. To put it simply, the process of producing paper is relatively high, and along this, huge space should be allocated to keep these official documents in comparison with clouding ones. To exemplify, with little payment in Dropbox, a specific virtual space is dedicated for storage, even these are highly accessible everywhere. On the one side, switching to print in a business workflow is beneficial since differences in shape of handwriting are diverse, and thus, the readability of text might decrease drastically. Besides, grammatical or lexical mistakes in a long text could be hardly fixed hardly. Nevertheless, using hands is one of the motor skills with which the brain could develop and expand significantly. This is to say, all people from schoolchildren to the elderly are in danger ofendangered of losing part of creativity and memory as long as they do not use their motor skills in their lives. Thus, it is substantial essential to acquire this ability. In conclusion, advances in technology mostly offer a wide range of facilities from accessibility to maintenance in the field of written communication. From my point of view, this revolution could be considered an affirmative development due to being easily repairable fixable easily and high pace in reading as long as handwriting is taught as well as utilized in different aspects of human beings.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The education you receive from your family is more important than the education you receive from school. To what extent do you agree with this statement and why? This essay argues that although schools play a crucial role in the development process of one’s character, most of the time, it is observed that the person’s character is massively impacted by his or her family and friends and when is it comes to being a good citizen, personality always comes before education. The main duty of schools must be to help students to experience different social communication skills in a safe and somehow isolated environment. Besides, schools teach pupils some topics such as mathematics and physics so they can get educated enough to play a productive role later in society. but in schools, the science on its own should not be assumed as the final purpose of going to school. In from this point of view, teachers, parents and siblings are all responsible for a kid’s misbehaviors. They are all involved in the process of nurturing the child at least to the point he or she enters high school. After that, it is hard to develop a student’s personality traits as he or she now has some friends having a huge impact on him or her. On the other hand, if a student doesn’t have a well-developed foundation for his/her academic career before getting into college or university, he/she would face serious obstacles finding a decent career to pursue. However, adults are able to overcome such issues by applying hard work and discipline which are personality traits obtained in their childhood. To conclude, the main goal of sending kids to junior schools and middle schools must be character development instead of learning scientific subjects. Later in high school, where youths’ character is well shaped, schools may pay more attention to science rather than developing students’ personality.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job work five days a week for shorter hours. Agree or disagree? It is absolutely undeniable that jobs play a paramount role in people's life and working hours are an inseparable part of them. Some people prefer to work shorter hours more days in a week and others would rather to work despite the abovementioned condition, so a question arises as tothat which of these circumstances can be more beneficial for individuals. Personally, I opine opt to choose the latter situation for some main reasons which I will explain at length in the subsequent paragraphs. Firstly, although people who work three days of the week for longer hours would be under more pressure, they would be motivated by thinking about those remainder remaining free days, so they are encouraged to tolerate this situation. Besides, these employees can spend more quality time with their families and friends. According to the some conducted research people who invest more time into in beloved ones not only have more stimulants/motivation for working productively but also they have less mental disorders. The best example is, people who work in compressed hours can have efficient short holidays to get rid of wash down all the burnout and boredom. Therefore, it goes without saying that perusing three work days in a week for long hours can have positive effect on employees' mental health. Secondly, individuals who take only three days a week for working can find another part-time job which is conducive to earning more money, so their they can boost their welfare which makes them happier humans. For instance, newly married people who have a middle income level can affordtheir fancy goals and bring more comfort to their lives, thereby going after different occupations can achieve that end. Moreover, these people can spend their off days on increasing their education level. For example, in my country generally people who are in the same job position but have higher education in their resume will be received big paychecks compared to those who do not have. Hence, as is clear employees who work three days a week for longer hours have more chance to obtain money and perusing peruse higher levels of education. To recap, on the basis of reasons (which were) mentioned above, I totally believe that working for less/fewer days in longer hours can be more effective for people based on being motivated for working efficiently and having a more opportunities to enhance their welfare.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The only way to improve road safety is to impose severe punishments for driving offences. Do you agree or disagree? Undoubtedly, the number of car accidents have has increased in recent years. In this regard, some people think that one of the most effective ways to develop road safety is to put intense penalty for driving violations/offences. I partially agree with this perspective because I believe that the government should take action in order to develop public transportation. Admittedly, strict punishments can help to encourage people to drive safely. This means that severe fines for careless drivers can act as a deterrent and so that they do not repeat it their violations/offences/carelessness/recklessness again. In other words, there are different kinds of punishments such as fine, suspension license, and prison. For example, imagine a person who pays a huge fine because of speed/exceeding the speed limit and this costs him a fortune. So, he does not commit this offence again. Thus, road safety can be developed by putting severe punishment for those who drive in a dangerous way. However, the administration should take responsibility to improveing public modes of transport. This is because the rate of populations have increased nowadays and these transport facilities cannot response respond the populations. So, if the governments improved public transport facilities, people would be encouraged to use public transportation and this can lead to the advancement of roads. For instance, in most countries, people do not use public transports such as the underground or the bus, because they are not developed and they are always crowded and individuals decide to use their own private cars. Therefore, the government should develop public transportation because in this way people do not drive their own cars and roads safety will become improve. To conclude, after analyzing what has been elaborated above,I partially agree with this viewpoint putting introducing/imposing/setting severe punishment for driving offences because I believe that strict fines cannot work alone and we have other problems such as development of pubic modes of transport. It is hoped to that the government will take certain measures in order to improve road safety.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this? Most of the times photos are used in news broadcasting because they believe this type of news would be much more effective than those without pictures. I am of the opinion that pictures play a major role in enhancing the rate of news effectiveness. At first, we should notice that pictures have a mutual language in all over the world. Understanding written or vocal news is related to knowing that language and being aware of some backgrounds that will make the news conceivable for us. If we consider of all of the audiences have these conditions, they may sometimes not fully understand the purpose of the news yet. But pictures can clarify even the most complex texts. Moreover, we should spend a particular time to reading the news or listening to the speaker, but image is able to make a deep communicaetion a deep message towith us in a second and help us to get the news instantly. So if we have the opportunity of following the news in our busy lives, it is more appropriate to understanding them as quickly as possible. It would assistance us to perceive/in perceiving more events while conserving the time that is so valuable to us. After all, news agencies are sorely willing to influence the people with their news as more much as possible. Because of this issue they hire skilled photographers to excel and to guarantee their popularity and their large readership rank of their audiences. To summarize, I literally believe that how much news affects us is extremely influenced by the attached/accompanying pictures. This is a very as a vital issue for people and consequently for the news agencies as a picture-less less news would be meaningless less or boring nowadays.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It is inevitable that as technology develops so traditional cultures must be lost. Technology and tradition are incompatible – You cannot have both together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement? It is undeniable that technology is advancing at an incredible pace and it is eliminating some traditional cultures but it is not logical to consider them incompatible. Some traditions are of stone age manners and still exist in the golden era of intellectuality and education. Ergo it is inevitable that progress of science and technology gradually annihilate them. Without taking those old-fashioned ways of thinking into consideration, traditional cultures and technology can co-exist and even complete each other. For instance, traditions obligate us to behave in respected manners while we are with the elderly. Technology introduces numerous ways of communication with them allowing us to both show them our respect and care towards them. Newer generations can teach older ones the new materials that technology brought along and this can be a positive point for technology too. The more users trying to be acquainted with technology the better it is for society. Apart from behavioral aspects, many find traditions interesting and for that reason they travel to visit those places. This can be a positive point for that destination financially and even in terms of reputation. By using the internet and technology people find these places and wonder about them. So not only is not the technology not of any harm to traditions but also rather it can be a tool to attract people towards it. To sum up, I can firmly say that technology and traditions are not necessarily rivals. Sometimes technology can be a great help to put an end to some illogical traditions but it is not fair to generalize this idea to all traditional cultures.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Using a computer everyday can have more negative than positive effects on young children. Do you agree or disagree? I tend to agree that young children can be negatively affected by spending too much time on the compute4r computer every day. For instance, sitting in front of a screen for too long can threaten their health specially their eyes and their physical posture. However, the main concern is that, usually children especially juveniles use the computer for playing games that most of them are violenceviolent. In addition, the player is so impressed by the game that they get addicted to it. The too much exposure can encourage children to be anti-social and insensitive to others. Even, when children use the computer in a correct way such as getting some information or searching something for their schoolwork purposes, this fact that they are drowning in to the non-virtual world is undeniable, and this would have effected on their future social behavior. In spite of this, because of the development of the technology, children have to learn how to use the computer. Their adult world is dependent on the technology, and the computer and the internet are two important factors that everyone have has to have knowledge about them. At the end, I believe that spending too much time on the screen is harmful, but we cannot forbid our children to not to use the computer, because nowadays computers are one of the most significant gadgets in the world. Therefore, in my opinion parents should establish, impose, place, put, set make some limits for their children about this tool and control their time that is spending spent on the screen.