جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

It is important for children to learn difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children? Distinguishing between right and wrong is a crucial stage in growing raising children that such that the main part of this refers to their breeding upbringing in both family and school. Some believe punishment plays an important role to in achieve achieving this goal. I agree some kinds of punishment could keep children on the right path. To begin with, sometimes punishment could be considered a deterrent factor due to the fact that the fear of it is more likely to encourage children to stay away from wrong decisions. If individuals are punished fairly and justly, they can learn valuable lessons from that. Although however, it depends on the age of the child. Punishment Punishing the infants is wrong because they do not recognize between wrong and right and they do not understand why they are being punished. Moreover, physical and harsh punishments can have many negative physical and mental consequences for the children. So teachers and parents should be very careful how they punish their children. So parents and teachers as role models, who should try to teach their children and students in the best state of that, can use a variety of methods to discipline them. Imposing athe punishment which fits the crime could be the best solution. Such as detention for their bad behavior, withdrawal of their privileges, and making them apologize to the friend that they have hurt. In conclusion, although punishment sometimes could help individuals learn many lessonsstudies, parents and teachers should much be more careful about the punishment that they impose on their children and youngsters thanks toin order to preventing the negative impacts on them.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In some countries, many people do not have enough money to access the Internet. should governments be responsible for ensuring that everyone can get access to the internet? In the last decades, the Internet has changed the quality and quantity of information. Also the convenience and speed of this invention/the Internet helps people gain access to all sorts of information. Although the Internetit is a great tool for interacting around the world at a relatively low cost, its needs some expensive requires requirements like computers or even smart phones. For this reason, governments should take steps to ensure that anyone who wants to use the Internet can do so; otherwise, the gap between the rich and the poor grows wider. Since the Covid-19 pandemic in all over the world and the quarantine situations, people require the social world even more than before, and the Internet provides many learning opportunism opportunities and enables people to form communities in new and unique relationships. Unfortunately, we have seen that some poor areas in our country have been divested from of these facilities. In these areas, governments could subsidies subsidise the purchase of the equipment and the infrastructure so that people can visit Internet sites, and download information that their need. Children whose families lack the necessary equipment and connections at home are at a disadvantages compared to their wealthier counterparts/children whose families do. This means that the government should cover the cost of these kinds of facilities and even they could provide free of charges at school libraries’ and public libraries, especially for educational purposes.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Education should be accessible to people of all economic backgrounds. All levels of education, from primary school to tertiary education, should be free. To what extent do you agree with this opinion? There are many scientists and literati who come from low-economic levels of society. It can be the main reason for governments to give educational access to all of the people with any economic backgrounds. This issue has lots of other causes such as following human rights and helping to society’s developingdevelopment, to name but a few. Despite these advantages, free education also has some disadvantages. Maybe it can give the chance of a better life for poor people or help the society to develop more by using all of its human potential, but there is the possibility of devalue devaluing the learning for those who doesn’t do not spend at all/even a penny for it. At first I want to emphasize the importance of free education and some of its advantages. In my view, free education is one of the most significant rights that each people should have it. It is because of that anybody may have a better life now, if they had a better situation in the past. This achievement will extend to the whole society and all of these people with various economic backgrounds can help it to evolve; as we see many poor children in the history that became the most capable ones in the world. likeSuch as any other concept/rules, this issue may have disadvantages too. Free education is thought of as being valueless for people who doesn’t do not pay for it. This will be affecting the quality of instruction, when a lot of students are not as eager as their mates. This problem is more possible in higher education because when they are young/childrena child they don’t have a well clear perception of financial issues. So in my opinion we can divide education as primary and advanced, means meaning tertiary education. While Primary learning is free for all people, higher education will be at a cost but governments should help poor students to have part time jobs to cover these costs. In addition, they can dedicate funds for interested and talented students to help them to flourish. To summarize, all ranges of people should access education as a human right and it should be free for lower economic levels in primary education. University instruction can be not free because of the quality, but suitable part time jobs and persuasive scholarships should be considered by the governments for those students who cannot pay its costs by themselves.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Computers are becoming an essential part of school lessons do the advantage of this outweigh the advantages? Nowadays, computers are playing as an integral part in the school’s schedule for students. I suppose that the benefits of working with the computer as an educational module could overshadow some unfavorable aspects of using it. Dord = Density/density D or d = density It would be universally accepted, on the one hand, that computers could have an array of significant roles in the learning style of a student when it comes to being as a unit/lesson in their school syllabus/curriculum. This would mean that learners would sift through their information based on their needs. Such a method of organization might provide them with opportunities to save their precious time and energy. This is due to the fact they would have access to all the relevant data in the blink of an eye/ for a short while. In doing so, students could assign their time to extracurricular activities such as taking part in doing sport, writing code, and having pleasure time with their families and friends, to name but a few. With the aforesaid favorable features, learners, in the long run, might become more intelligent than that thoseof graduated graduating in the past decade or two without having computer lessons in the school. Some negative points of the computer lesson in the school, however, could be that those who just rely on computer tools might not be able to calculate numbers with their mind in the future. This, albeit manageable, might cause them addiction/they them to become addicted to the computer programs such as excel, calculator to solve any mathematical question. This being the case, not only might make learners being indolent but also they would losekill their inventive minds. These shortcomings, in the long term, would lead students to be faced with physical and mental problems/disorders. To sum up, regarding the debate surrounding whether computer lessons could bring students some benefits or not, I suppose that using the computer would make them more inventive although they should not fail to working with their mind and computer simultaneously.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think parents are responsible for transporting their children to school. Others think it is the government's responsibility. School goers' transportation has always been a matter of concern for parents and the government. In this regard, some individuals argue that parents should take the responsibility for transporting their children to school because it is more secure. Some others argue that it is the administration’s responsibility in order to assist family financially. I partially agree with both viewpoints. On the one hand, children can be more secure by being taken to school by their parents. In other words, if parents took their children to school, it would prevent them from possible hazards. It means that when parents drop off their children to school or pick them up they are safer/in a safety conditions. For instance, a recent study showed that, most of children are at risk of accidents when they come back home by buses and taxies. Therefore, parents should accept responsibility for transporting their children during school years because they will be secure. On the other hand, some people rely on the government's support because it is more time saving for parents. It means that most parents lack the time to take their children to school in the morning because of their obligation at work . For example, imagine a family who have more than 2/two children and each of them is attending different schools and parents do not have time for multiple destinations. Thus, it is the authority's duty to assist family for transporting and they can save time. To conclude, after analyzing what has been elaborated above, I partially agree with both viewpoints because I believe that parents should take care of their children when they go to primary school because they are kids/too young and in this way they will be safer. And also the government have the duty of supporting family and sending their children to school when they become adult and it is very time consuming for parents .

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Many young people are leaving their homes in rural areas to study or work in cities. What are the reasons? Do the advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages? It is undeniable that in the contemporary world, a plethora of new generations are abandoning their homes in little towns to have a new lease of life in metropolitan and vibrant cities to have a better quality of education and job option. A number of causes lie behind these immigrations events/this movement. To begin with, there are two primary reasons why the youths are moving to towns. The First and the foremost cause is in remote areas people mostly suffer from lacks of fundamental facilities in the terms of education. In other words, big cities frequently offer high-quality universities, where state-of-the-art gadgets and equipment are placed waiting for enthusiastic students to research in different subjects; , increasing their knowledge and being an effective person in their society. Furthermore, in small countries, young generations regularly face difficulties into finding a suitable job. Whereas citizens of towns have a greater employment opportunity. Turning to the merits of this movement. One of the main positive points is that moving to bustling metropolises probably results in exposure to different educational courses and options. While in the countries country young minds are limited with merely options as long as any universities exist. Secondly, multi-dimensional jobs are in only megalopolis, whereas in small rural areas, jobs rely on the basic needs of people living there. Thus, numerous people could not follow their career dreams. To exemplify, Silicon Valley which lies in the south of San Francisco is the cradle of technology where many nerds move to live their ambitious living. Living in busy cities, however, means that either losing touch with family and friends or feeling isolation at first. In conclusion, nowadays moving to bustling towns is a highly controversial issue that shortages of educational facilities and a few workplaces might be the main reasons for this immigration. In my view, it is pretty positive for them in terms of education and job opportunities.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? Working while studying is becoming very common these days and many are questioning this activity since the attention to and focus on what may constitute their future is are diminishing. Usually, a great deal of stress is followed by this due to the shortage of time and struggle of mind. Initially what causes a person to work is obviously financial needs. Although there are many who don’t work for the need of money, one can say they are not quite affiliated with their studying major and therefore they pursue their business dreams. These days people follow academic courses because they feel that having academic certificates or degrees is a must in this era and ergo they step set foot in where they don’t like to be and work where they feel comfortable. Even though a debate rises which indicates that many are neither working in their favorite workplace nor studying what they like, we should always consider some exceptions. So, it is fair to say the main reasons causing one to work while they are studying is either financial reasons or lack of interest in their major in university or college. A great number of people are working in a field which is related to their education and there are many who claim this is a reasonable path to go through because they are experiencing what they are learning theoretically and this boosts their skills in the future. Finding a related occupation to your education field is often challenging and it takes a lot of effort but it is worth trying if you insist to on working while you are in universities. It is impossible for clinical sciences to experience the theories until graduation and because of the expensive tuitions in universities, people who are in need of money find themselves selves in worst of situations. In this case nothing but financial aids of the government is useful. Governments should employ a method to loan money to students and start their paybacks after they are have graduated. This way they have their most attention on to their study and can worry about money later when they are working and earning some money.