Fridays

Amirhossein, Animal Testing

2021-04-30T19:18:35+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Using animals to test the safety of cosmetics or drugs used for medical reasons is never acceptable. To what extent do you agree with this statement? In this day and age, producing the products that are safe for humans is a main issue which most of the pharmaceutical and beauty-care companies are dealing with. Some companies have offered a multitude of solutions for this issue one of which is to test their new outputs on animals. In the First place, it is very cruel to sacrifice animals for our own purposes. In a year’s time over 100 million from different of species spices die for experimental testing which is very painful. Animal testing causes creatures to suffer great pain and fear during these tests most of the times which in turn leads to only a small fraction of animals to return to nature or their habitat after the experiments. On the other hand, supporters of these experiments believe that animal lives are less valuable than the human beings, so by this method many lives have been saved. For instance, many effective drugs against the illnesses such as cancer, heart dieases have been discovered by scientists. However, I opine that, these experiments should be limited and used only when necessary. In addition, such tests for beauty products must be completely removed from the cosmetic industry. Besides, there is are alternative ways for this issue. For example, the effective use ofusing cell culture cultures is one of the effective methods. Today, almost every type of human and animal cell can be grown in the laboratory. Moreover, Using advanced computers for simulation and modeling is another a very powerful/useful way. So overall, I believe that animal testing is never acceptable when there are different ways for this issue and it should only be used for special cases.

Ana Ajdar, Similar Products

2021-04-30T19:18:20+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is positive or negative development? There is the notion when similar products spread around the world countries are becoming similar to each other. I completely believe this development can have detrimental effects on the countries` economy and culture. To begin with, the history and culture of every country can be seen in artifacts that have been manufactured in that country. If international products advance relentlessly into every country around the World, they are more likely to one day oust the traditional objects of every nation, which not only would they lead to lose losing the diversity around the World, but also they lose the identity of any nation. Take Iranian copper utensils crockery as an example; these dishes are part of the Iranian culture that are not similar to any other dish. On the other hand, the spread of multinational products can cause lossto lose of many jobs. It means, many factories which produce traditional products like food, utensils, clothes, and accessories and create a wide range of employment for local people, cannot work as before. Moreover, the tourism industry may be affected. Because because tourists do are not impelled to buy goods which are the same everywhere so it could harm the local economy. For example, there are many small areas that whosetheir economy relates to goods they sell to tourists or export to other countries. That/who my/his/her/their I have a friend who his /that his whose daughter drinks water before eftar. To conclude, from my point of view, having access to the same products can have a detrimental influence on specially the local economy because local people lose their jobs. Besides, it can bring an uniformity around the World.

M Radmehr, Throw-away Society

2021-04-30T19:18:09+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays, we are living in a throw-away society. What are its causes and what are its problems? What could be done to address this issue? It could be universally accepted that a large majority of people, who live all around the world, do not consume food, water resources, and also their other their properties properly. This essay will discuss how this kind of lifestyle would impact on our lives and future generations and also consider some steps that can be adopted to iron out the troubles which is are associated to such. There are a number of likely explanations why people throw away clothes and equipment while they are still working. This is because of the advent of the technology that some consumers are putting aside their own stuff and utilize utilizing up-to-the-minute gadgets, while they are working appropriately. Example of such consumption would be that the users are keen to wear the latest fashion clothes and drive a luxurious car and be encouraged to throw away their clothes and other accessories. This would mean that some people seek to show off their latest purchases, which might be a kind a status symbol in some societysocieties. This kind of living, hence/gradually, would cause some adverse condition for our ecosystem and it is probable that our environment will be upset. Although however, these troubles are not insurmountable/insolvable provided that an appropriate measure is adopted. The most practical way could be that consumers should use their stuff goods as long as they perform/work as appropriately/well as they areit is working suitably. Moreover, consumers could endeavor to separate their garbage into a different package, then put it into the recycle bin. This process of separating tools in place, in the long run, result in recycling process being easy in dump site. To sum up, from my point of view, the government should raise the public awareness about changing their lifestyle and using their stuff commodities as long asuntil they work correctly; moreover, implying applying a strict role rule on separating rubbish in different parts before throwing them away them.

Musicians

2021-04-30T19:17:59+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Scientists and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artists. To what extent do you agree? Modern societies and their needs are seriously changed. Nowadays in most of societies it seems the importance of science and technology is increasingly flourishedemphasized/stressed/reiterated/insisted on, while the value of art and music is highly underestimated. There are different thoughts and a lot of opponents about this issue. Some people believe that artists and musicians are valued as much as scientists and technology experts in modern societies. They opine the growth of art and music is a result of societies’ supports. This range of people also think that we cannot draw a border between art and technology since art and music are using technology and science’s potentials; VR and AR are the most specified examples for their view. Others’ opinion is that there is a huge discrimination and although there is an unrecognizable border between art and technology or science, there is another importance about art and music that is societies’ mental life. In addition to use of technology in art and music, we have to support artists and musicians because of the “art” itself. This reinforcement will bring us a better mental life with more professional music products and more convenient art and designs even in our modern cities. To conclude, modern societies place more value on scientists and technology specialists, and the reason may be that we think more materialistically now and physical needs are more essential to us. But artists and musicians should be supported as well to develop, because our life has two aspects and there are two groups of needs: physical and mental.

Niki, Using Computer for Children

2021-04-30T19:17:48+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on young children. Do you agree or disagree? Given that it has today been a common practice for children to use electronic devices such as computers constantly all over the world, its advantages or the downsides are a moot point which most of the parents are dealing with. First and foremost, I opine that since overuse of computers has regrettably received wide currency among the children in this day and age, they are more susceptible to being negatively affected. In other words, in terms of health, not only is does their body be influenced physically but also such activities have a various array of mental impacts. For instance, those who are used to sitting in front of a screen for a multitude of hours in succession will generally get ill owing to changes in their physical posture and also their eye sight. In addition, depending on the content of programs or games, such children are normally prone to be self-directed and insensitive to others in psychological/emotional terms. Moreover, given that they spend a plenty of time in the virtual world, most of the parents are concerned for their charges’ soft skills such as team work and face to face communications, particularly for their future. Therefore, my firm conviction is that only if parents put their every effort into supervising their offspring’s virtual activities, will we have more qualified young descendants in future. On the other hand, the overt advantages of state-of-the-art technology cannot be denied at all. Since, most of the main activities are done through the Internet, children ought to learn how to work with novel devices and applications so as to prevent avoidfrom lagging behind their peers at schools and also in future. Other than parents, I strongly believe an efficient education system has much of a role to play in fostering pupils’ expertise in this regard. Quality training, especially in elementary schools brings about up/nurture/raise more skillful students which in turn leads to paving the path to have more professional young adults in future. Consequently, in my opinion, use of computers is a positive activity per se provided children plan to work with it in moderation, otherwise whose their/its negative effects will outweigh positive ones significantly.

Niloo, Governments Support Artists Financially

2021-04-30T19:17:37+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

January 10th, 2021 Governments should not provide financial support to artists (for example painter, writers, musicians …) let them support themselves. Do you agree or disagree? Hardly ever can anyone call into question the significant role of governments' investment in society. The question arises as to whether governments should spend money on the arts or not. I wholeheartedly adhere to this belief that governments should assist artists financially for some main reasons which I will explain at length in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, supporting artists financially by governments gravitates more people toward considering arts a job. In other words, the artarts creates various jobs for people, so not only can it decrease the number of unemployed individuals but also it can produce more tax revenue which sounds is beneficial for society/governments. For example, the Iranian government can gain more financial benefits by liberalizing women's dance and music industry. Therefore, it goes without saying that governments can increase the number rate of employment who which leads to higher tax incomeshould pay tax, thereby spending money on artists, so it can be practical for both governments and society. Another issue which I should point out is about tourism. The arts is are an integral part of a nation's culture, so it introduces countries to each other, thus it attracts tourists. In apposite words, fundamentally governments by investing money in arts can encourage artists to produce more efficient artworks which is conducive to gravitate drawing/bringing/absorbing tourists. The best example is, although Dubai is a relatively new city, it attracts many tourists throughout the year due to its modern urban planning. Besides, the manpower is higher larger/bigger in countries whose government support arts. For instance, pupils who want to study fashion, photography orarchitecture often immigrate to France and Italy because of the historical reinforcement investment that these countries have for artists. Hence, as is clear tourists and immigrants can generate tremendous income for the host country, so governments by supporting artists financially can achieve that end. Last but not least, even though some people believe that artists should be assisting assisted by private sectors or themselves, I strongly believe otherwise maintaining that this way of thinking is not but a narrow-outlook which overlooks the importance of the abovementioned facts. As a matter of the fact in my opinion the advantages of supporting artists financially by government greatly outweigh than the drawbacks. In conclusion, on the basis of reasons which were mentioned above, I urge governments to invest more money in artists to gain/derive more benefits.

Shaghyegh, Women

2021-04-30T19:17:22+00:00

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that women should be treated as equal to men when applying for a job with the police or the military. Others think that women are less suitable for this kind of job. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Over the recent years, gender equality in employment has provoked controversy. Whereas a majority of people support the idea that a person’s quality should be considered rather than his or her gender, others hold the opposite view in which women are not able to handle some jobs perfectly. A considerable number of people suppose that jobs requiring high physical strength are not suitable for women who primarily are have less physical power in comparison with their male colleagues. In other words, women’s muscles are often less weaker than men’s; therefore, should they work in the military where there is plenty of huge equipment to be carried, they are more likely to struggle with those situations. Furthermore, in extreme conditions when an army should defend and be aware, lack of physical strength may contribute to failure in a war. By contrast, some, myself included, maintain that women, by contrast, should receive an equal chance to be accepted intoat the military and police regardless of gender bias since they are capable of certain tasks. It is a fallacy to believe that in the military, for instance, men charged to do all tasks can properly handle them. Women are instrumental in some parts which call for speed and concentration or even nursing staff. Apart from this, referring to Islamic some countries where people’s religious traditional restrictions views have limited such professionmen’s duties, women have been altered as easy as possible to complete their peers; therefore, this matter could extend to other nations as well. In conclusion, while many hold the view that women are not compatible with police and military duties as they may have fewer physical abilities, the other group subscribes to the belief that they can be extremely effective in different parts of those systems. Personally, I strongly believe all people should have the same chance when they fill a job application.