FridaysGMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم
تلفن: 42-88679341https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/545-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-12-012024-05-02T15:51:52+00:00IELTSTOEFLCENTERinfo@ieltstoeflcenter.comJoomla! - Open Source Content ManagementCell Phones2021-02-19T17:35:14+00:002021-02-19T17:35:14+00:00https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/545-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-12-01/3863-cell-phonesHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.12.01/Cell Phones.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Many people today use their phones to communicate by sending messages than
talking. What are the reasons for this? Are there more advantages than
disadvantages?
In the 21st century, a myriad of individuals tend to use their cell phones to text to
others rather than calling them. There are a few causes why this occurs. Although
there are several merits in this trend, the drawbacks are harmful.
To commence with the reasons, nowadays, the speed of life is dramatically high.
Thus, no one is able to spend a lot of time chatting on the phone for hours.
Everyone prefers sending messages to avoid wasting time. Texts are easy and fast
to send, and for their remarkable convenience they have become the most
preferable way of communication. Another cause to mention would be the fact
that everyone is able to convey a message by texts everywhere they are; silent
zones such as hospitals and conferences, for instance. However, calling is not
possible in such situations.
To continue with the disadvantages, it is worth mentioning that these messages
may lead to misunderstanding. Obviously, the tune, melody of voice and the
mimic of the sender is not distinguishable for the receiver. Therefore, a dispute
may arise between the two people. Another demerit could be the lack of ability to
show your emotions. Nevertheless there are some emoticons available on
applications, WhatsApp or Telegram, for example, we cannot transfer our love to
those we appreciate. To endanger a language may be another negative impact
this development brings about. To speed up writing texts mostly everybody uses
abbreviation or slangs which jeopardize an authentic language in time.
In conclusion, there might be positive points in sending texts to others, to save
time or its availability. Nonetheless, the demerits of this fast spreading trend
should be carefully taken into consideration to avoid misunderstanding,
increasing emotional distance between human beings or disappearance of a
language.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.12.01/Cell Phones.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Many people today use their phones to communicate by sending messages than
talking. What are the reasons for this? Are there more advantages than
disadvantages?
In the 21st century, a myriad of individuals tend to use their cell phones to text to
others rather than calling them. There are a few causes why this occurs. Although
there are several merits in this trend, the drawbacks are harmful.
To commence with the reasons, nowadays, the speed of life is dramatically high.
Thus, no one is able to spend a lot of time chatting on the phone for hours.
Everyone prefers sending messages to avoid wasting time. Texts are easy and fast
to send, and for their remarkable convenience they have become the most
preferable way of communication. Another cause to mention would be the fact
that everyone is able to convey a message by texts everywhere they are; silent
zones such as hospitals and conferences, for instance. However, calling is not
possible in such situations.
To continue with the disadvantages, it is worth mentioning that these messages
may lead to misunderstanding. Obviously, the tune, melody of voice and the
mimic of the sender is not distinguishable for the receiver. Therefore, a dispute
may arise between the two people. Another demerit could be the lack of ability to
show your emotions. Nevertheless there are some emoticons available on
applications, WhatsApp or Telegram, for example, we cannot transfer our love to
those we appreciate. To endanger a language may be another negative impact
this development brings about. To speed up writing texts mostly everybody uses
abbreviation or slangs which jeopardize an authentic language in time.
In conclusion, there might be positive points in sending texts to others, to save
time or its availability. Nonetheless, the demerits of this fast spreading trend
should be carefully taken into consideration to avoid misunderstanding,
increasing emotional distance between human beings or disappearance of a
language.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Education Gap2021-02-19T17:35:05+00:002021-02-19T17:35:05+00:00https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/545-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-12-01/3862-education-gapHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.12.01/Education Gap.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people take a year off between school and university, to work or
to travel. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Some individuals would rather take a year off between school and tertiary education in order
to travel or work. I partly align with this notion because its benefits surpass its disadvantages,
albeit it cannot ring true for whole cases.
On the one hand, if were students are in jobs or on a journey, they could be more seasoned
alongside their peers and counterparts. To exemplify, they are supposed to communicate with
other people which could lead to learning more and more in with regard to their
communication and accountability whether in at work or in on a trip, in turn, they get to know
how to deal with money and how to accomplish their tasks according to what others anticipate
as well as what they are fond of. As a whole, their attitudes and personality are going to be
modified or tempered.
On the flip side, some say in some cases, an interval between study could back fire on students.
Only when they are among inappropriate jobs or dishonest people could they their interest
evaporate their interest toward further education. According to them, Those aforementioned
jobs and people can indoctrinate students’ mind by not wasting their time in university or
higher education which belongs to incompetent people. Needless to say, their peer pressure
can put a strain on them and change their trajectory in the wrong direction.
To summarize, if they are resolute and determined, they students who pause their education
for a year are less likely to be influenced by others even if they are in a destructive atmosphere
and can benefit from any virtues of jobs and travel.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.12.01/Education Gap.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people take a year off between school and university, to work or
to travel. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Some individuals would rather take a year off between school and tertiary education in order
to travel or work. I partly align with this notion because its benefits surpass its disadvantages,
albeit it cannot ring true for whole cases.
On the one hand, if were students are in jobs or on a journey, they could be more seasoned
alongside their peers and counterparts. To exemplify, they are supposed to communicate with
other people which could lead to learning more and more in with regard to their
communication and accountability whether in at work or in on a trip, in turn, they get to know
how to deal with money and how to accomplish their tasks according to what others anticipate
as well as what they are fond of. As a whole, their attitudes and personality are going to be
modified or tempered.
On the flip side, some say in some cases, an interval between study could back fire on students.
Only when they are among inappropriate jobs or dishonest people could they their interest
evaporate their interest toward further education. According to them, Those aforementioned
jobs and people can indoctrinate students’ mind by not wasting their time in university or
higher education which belongs to incompetent people. Needless to say, their peer pressure
can put a strain on them and change their trajectory in the wrong direction.
To summarize, if they are resolute and determined, they students who pause their education
for a year are less likely to be influenced by others even if they are in a destructive atmosphere
and can benefit from any virtues of jobs and travel.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Environment Change2021-02-19T17:34:57+00:002021-02-19T17:34:57+00:00https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/545-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-12-01/3861-environment-changeHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.12.01/Environment Change.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Scientists believe that the world is in danger due to environmental changes. Some
people say that personal lifestyle changes should be made to reduce the damage to
environment, while others think that the government should do something to help.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion
The nature of the environment is changing/has been changed; accordingly, the world
faces danger constantly. The question is whether all the steps to reduce this potential
danger should be done adopted/taken by governments or individuals play a significant
role as well.
In most societies, the lack of public awareness about irrecoverable environmental
effects on the next generations of humanity results in allocating less budget on to
proper education in the area of the environment. In fact, should governments raise
environmental awareness, possible consequences of people’s actions could be reduced
substantially. According to recent surveys in nations where the ecological syllabus is
inserted compulsory to train fresh minds, a the range of environmental degradation has
been reduced significantly. Furthermore, governments could impose legislation on antienvironment actions which means that heavy penalties could be considered in order to
protect the environment. For instance, under new ecological regulations, new
constructions are used using environmentally friendly materials in their foundations
having the minimum damage. The High tax (which is) put on oil is another tangible
example.
The modification of lifestyle, on the other hand, can allocate play a significant part of in
reducing this damage. These days, the way people live is affected by the media;
encouraging them to follow the latest fashion. As a result, they are more materialistic
and consumerism consumerist compared to/in comparison to/as against/as opposed to
the previous generations. This trend calls for more utilize utilizing of the limited natural
resources. The futuristic view of this means that essential actions should be done,
otherwise the world will face difficulties in providing necessities. Moreover, people
could be encouraged to not only use reusable tools but also recycle their trash.
In conclusion, although the role of governments to tackle this problem is inevitable due
to its power in increasing public awareness and imposing laws, all of the efforts are
incomplete without people’s contribution. I believe that all individuals and authorities
should have close participation cooperation/collaboration together.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.12.01/Environment Change.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Scientists believe that the world is in danger due to environmental changes. Some
people say that personal lifestyle changes should be made to reduce the damage to
environment, while others think that the government should do something to help.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion
The nature of the environment is changing/has been changed; accordingly, the world
faces danger constantly. The question is whether all the steps to reduce this potential
danger should be done adopted/taken by governments or individuals play a significant
role as well.
In most societies, the lack of public awareness about irrecoverable environmental
effects on the next generations of humanity results in allocating less budget on to
proper education in the area of the environment. In fact, should governments raise
environmental awareness, possible consequences of people’s actions could be reduced
substantially. According to recent surveys in nations where the ecological syllabus is
inserted compulsory to train fresh minds, a the range of environmental degradation has
been reduced significantly. Furthermore, governments could impose legislation on antienvironment actions which means that heavy penalties could be considered in order to
protect the environment. For instance, under new ecological regulations, new
constructions are used using environmentally friendly materials in their foundations
having the minimum damage. The High tax (which is) put on oil is another tangible
example.
The modification of lifestyle, on the other hand, can allocate play a significant part of in
reducing this damage. These days, the way people live is affected by the media;
encouraging them to follow the latest fashion. As a result, they are more materialistic
and consumerism consumerist compared to/in comparison to/as against/as opposed to
the previous generations. This trend calls for more utilize utilizing of the limited natural
resources. The futuristic view of this means that essential actions should be done,
otherwise the world will face difficulties in providing necessities. Moreover, people
could be encouraged to not only use reusable tools but also recycle their trash.
In conclusion, although the role of governments to tackle this problem is inevitable due
to its power in increasing public awareness and imposing laws, all of the efforts are
incomplete without people’s contribution. I believe that all individuals and authorities
should have close participation cooperation/collaboration together.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Libraries2021-02-19T17:34:40+00:002021-02-19T17:34:40+00:00https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/545-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-12-01/3860-librariesHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.12.01/Libraries.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Public libraries should only provide books and should not waste their limited resources on expensive
high-tech media such as software, videos or DVDs. Do you agree or disagree?
Advancement of technology has caused all public places to changegetting changed, to a great extent.
These days, public libraries are contained plenty of various high-tech media facilities. Some people hold
that it is a way of wasting money to provide software, videos and DVDs for library user; however, others
assert that people are more attracted to these technical materials and libraries should consider them as
much as books and periodicals. From my stand point, most of libraries’ financial resources should be
spent on providing technological materials.
To find out how much of public libraries’ resources needs to be served on the technological part, a
group of people mention that the attraction of these materials are is not even compatible to traditional
book shelf’s. Library goers tend to use visual-audio DVDs and videos CDs in order to enhance their
hands-on experiences. Although, the old-fashioned way of reading a book can gives them theoretical
information, they need to watch and hear those items visually to have better function in practical
partaspects. They will be more expert in their relative field by reading books and watching videos,
simultaneously. It is also more advantageous to use software at public libraries, since it is more efficient
in terms of cost-benefit, compared to buying expensive software. For international students, for
instance, it costs them a fortune for them to buy these staffsmaterials, so using them at libraries is more
functional, convenient and beneficial.
Furthermore, using the internet for books, borrowers can make the procedure of borrowing less time
consuming, compared to the traditional ways of searching for a particular book. If they cannot find their
required book in their local library, they still can find its location in other libraries, in a the blink of an
eye. The internet networks has opened many different ways of connection for library users.
To put it in a nutshell, some people however, are concerned about the reduction of value and role of
books in people’s life., I strongly agree with those who believe that technology plays an active role in
providing new and functional facilities for library goers and it is not a the way of wasteing of libraries
resources.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.12.01/Libraries.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Public libraries should only provide books and should not waste their limited resources on expensive
high-tech media such as software, videos or DVDs. Do you agree or disagree?
Advancement of technology has caused all public places to changegetting changed, to a great extent.
These days, public libraries are contained plenty of various high-tech media facilities. Some people hold
that it is a way of wasting money to provide software, videos and DVDs for library user; however, others
assert that people are more attracted to these technical materials and libraries should consider them as
much as books and periodicals. From my stand point, most of libraries’ financial resources should be
spent on providing technological materials.
To find out how much of public libraries’ resources needs to be served on the technological part, a
group of people mention that the attraction of these materials are is not even compatible to traditional
book shelf’s. Library goers tend to use visual-audio DVDs and videos CDs in order to enhance their
hands-on experiences. Although, the old-fashioned way of reading a book can gives them theoretical
information, they need to watch and hear those items visually to have better function in practical
partaspects. They will be more expert in their relative field by reading books and watching videos,
simultaneously. It is also more advantageous to use software at public libraries, since it is more efficient
in terms of cost-benefit, compared to buying expensive software. For international students, for
instance, it costs them a fortune for them to buy these staffsmaterials, so using them at libraries is more
functional, convenient and beneficial.
Furthermore, using the internet for books, borrowers can make the procedure of borrowing less time
consuming, compared to the traditional ways of searching for a particular book. If they cannot find their
required book in their local library, they still can find its location in other libraries, in a the blink of an
eye. The internet networks has opened many different ways of connection for library users.
To put it in a nutshell, some people however, are concerned about the reduction of value and role of
books in people’s life., I strongly agree with those who believe that technology plays an active role in
providing new and functional facilities for library goers and it is not a the way of wasteing of libraries
resources.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Nasrin, International Aids2021-02-19T17:34:31+00:002021-02-19T17:34:31+00:00https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/545-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-12-01/3859-nasrin-international-aidsHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.12.01/Nasrin, International Aids.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some say that rich countries should help poor countries with trade, health and education. Do you
agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience.
One of the main goals of the United Nation is to facilitate deprived countries' sustainable
development. Yet, there has been much discussion revolving around whether developed countries
should assist the emergent nations. My firm conviction is that providing international aid is of
paramount significance to ensure world's peace, security and equality.
People living in economically developing countries grapple with many difficulties. To start with, lack
of education deprives them of securing steady jobs with stable income. In addition, the lack of
career prospects could aggravate the vicious circle created with illiteracy and unemployment, ;
therefore, people are condemned to a life of poverty made making them apathetic to improve their
living standards. The emergence of extremist extremism and radicalism is one of the inevitable
corollaries of the aforementioned situation, where underprivileged and uneducated individuals are
induced to commit crimes and spark off riots threatening the such country's countries’ security and
putting citizens' life in danger. Not only would poor countries be debilitated by these internal
conflicts, but also the neighboring ones and the world as a whole may bear the brunt of these
antisocial/dangerous activities which by and large threaten the civilization. A blatant example of this
phenomenon is the emergence of ISIS waging war in the Middle East, ruining many human heritages
and leaving many people with no choice but to leave their countries behind and seek asylum
overseas.
Many of the an aforementioned disasters can be sustainably mitigated by international cooperation.
First and foremost, skills and education are instrumental in building resilient economies and
ensuring that the local labor force can enhance their economic empowerment. Secondly, only when
the developing countries have access to the recent medical technologies and medicines which are
typically/by and large peculiar to rich countries, can they alleviate many health problems and fight
contagious fatal diseases. Finally, ensuring a predictable and rules-based trading system in which
poor countries can reap market opportunities, the international aid organizations can lay a sound
foundation for them to promote/expandprosper their domestic business in a sustainable manner,
thereby combating poverty.
In conclusion, I would argue that providing the under developed countries with international
assistance will help them overcome insurmountable obstacles which curtail their individual
capabilities. Otherwise, the poor will be destined to become poorer leading to existence creation of
an impending threat tofor global peace and security, hence the importance of joining hands to
address the global problems.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.12.01/Nasrin, International Aids.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some say that rich countries should help poor countries with trade, health and education. Do you
agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience.
One of the main goals of the United Nation is to facilitate deprived countries' sustainable
development. Yet, there has been much discussion revolving around whether developed countries
should assist the emergent nations. My firm conviction is that providing international aid is of
paramount significance to ensure world's peace, security and equality.
People living in economically developing countries grapple with many difficulties. To start with, lack
of education deprives them of securing steady jobs with stable income. In addition, the lack of
career prospects could aggravate the vicious circle created with illiteracy and unemployment, ;
therefore, people are condemned to a life of poverty made making them apathetic to improve their
living standards. The emergence of extremist extremism and radicalism is one of the inevitable
corollaries of the aforementioned situation, where underprivileged and uneducated individuals are
induced to commit crimes and spark off riots threatening the such country's countries’ security and
putting citizens' life in danger. Not only would poor countries be debilitated by these internal
conflicts, but also the neighboring ones and the world as a whole may bear the brunt of these
antisocial/dangerous activities which by and large threaten the civilization. A blatant example of this
phenomenon is the emergence of ISIS waging war in the Middle East, ruining many human heritages
and leaving many people with no choice but to leave their countries behind and seek asylum
overseas.
Many of the an aforementioned disasters can be sustainably mitigated by international cooperation.
First and foremost, skills and education are instrumental in building resilient economies and
ensuring that the local labor force can enhance their economic empowerment. Secondly, only when
the developing countries have access to the recent medical technologies and medicines which are
typically/by and large peculiar to rich countries, can they alleviate many health problems and fight
contagious fatal diseases. Finally, ensuring a predictable and rules-based trading system in which
poor countries can reap market opportunities, the international aid organizations can lay a sound
foundation for them to promote/expandprosper their domestic business in a sustainable manner,
thereby combating poverty.
In conclusion, I would argue that providing the under developed countries with international
assistance will help them overcome insurmountable obstacles which curtail their individual
capabilities. Otherwise, the poor will be destined to become poorer leading to existence creation of
an impending threat tofor global peace and security, hence the importance of joining hands to
address the global problems.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Noises2021-02-19T17:34:21+00:002021-02-19T17:34:21+00:00https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/545-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-12-01/3858-noisesHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.12.01/Noises.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Kamal Sadeghi
Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noises. Other think that they
could just make as much as noise they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about the problem of noises that should be controled and limited or let
others free to do it. I would say that people have the right to show this kind of emotions as they
want to do. Sabaitc.com
To begin with, for several reasons some commentators say that loud noises should be controled by
producers. Firstly, in hospitals and some houses there are some people who are struggling
encountered with problematic health issues, . consequently, they need rest in a quiet and
relaxing/ed atmosphere in search of recovery. Another reason would be those citizens who need to
concentrate on their work or lessons, . for example, some students who need towho have to focus
on their lessons, which needs a quiet site to pass exams that leads to a good result.
However, some justifiably believe that people sometimes have the right to make noises that they
want to do, and I have the same believe belief with as them. Producing noises sometimes is a kind of
positive motivation that some individuals like. For instance, cheering from the football fans or
singing at clubs or at houses in is one of the interesting favorites for certain individuals/some guys.
Furthermore, it is undeniable that in modern life man has found various ways to deal with the
problem of loud voices. There are some inventions including insulation materials for doors,
windows, walls, and roofs, which can reduce these noises completelymarkedly.
In conclusion, although there are some reasons that extra loud noises may bother some people, I
completely believe that people have the right to produce/makedo noises that they want to do and
those who feel bothered can use technological methods, which were mentioned above to reduce
these voices/noises.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.12.01/Noises.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Kamal Sadeghi
Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noises. Other think that they
could just make as much as noise they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about the problem of noises that should be controled and limited or let
others free to do it. I would say that people have the right to show this kind of emotions as they
want to do. Sabaitc.com
To begin with, for several reasons some commentators say that loud noises should be controled by
producers. Firstly, in hospitals and some houses there are some people who are struggling
encountered with problematic health issues, . consequently, they need rest in a quiet and
relaxing/ed atmosphere in search of recovery. Another reason would be those citizens who need to
concentrate on their work or lessons, . for example, some students who need towho have to focus
on their lessons, which needs a quiet site to pass exams that leads to a good result.
However, some justifiably believe that people sometimes have the right to make noises that they
want to do, and I have the same believe belief with as them. Producing noises sometimes is a kind of
positive motivation that some individuals like. For instance, cheering from the football fans or
singing at clubs or at houses in is one of the interesting favorites for certain individuals/some guys.
Furthermore, it is undeniable that in modern life man has found various ways to deal with the
problem of loud voices. There are some inventions including insulation materials for doors,
windows, walls, and roofs, which can reduce these noises completelymarkedly.
In conclusion, although there are some reasons that extra loud noises may bother some people, I
completely believe that people have the right to produce/makedo noises that they want to do and
those who feel bothered can use technological methods, which were mentioned above to reduce
these voices/noises.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Travel2021-02-19T17:34:06+00:002021-02-19T17:34:06+00:00https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/545-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-12-01/3857-travelHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.12.01/Travel.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group
led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Maybe we can say that, the most memorable events for each person have been happened in
on his journeys. In traveling, we are developing our ability to transform in difficult situations.
Trips are putting us in a resting state and When we are straggling with annoying life problems,
they can inject energy into our body cells. At the end of each trip, we will have achieved some
outstanding experiences which could help us in the future to cope with our life stressors as well
as possible. As I think journeys have to give us the sense of self-control so I believe that
traveling by a tour guide not only makes you more dependent but also dealing with a group can
makes you more tired.
For example, a man who is traveling by on his own/by himself should manage his money along
his journey to afford his expenses. He has to schedule his departure and reach the hotel
accurately. He has to look into the map and search to find astonishing places. he can make a
decision more freely but he will learn to pay his decision’s cost. All of this will lead to having
self-efficacy more and more.
On the other side, when a supervisor is a coordinator, we will lose a wide range of decisions.
We have to inhibit ourselves sometimes, to be adapt with to the group. you are always aware
of somebody's presence who can support you in unexpected conditions. By contrast,Despite
this when you are alone, you consciously know that the only person who is able to cope with
unprecedented incidents harness disasters is yourself.
Eventually, I guess traveling without a group leader can improve our skills in managing
money/budget, problem-solving and its final gain is the sense of self-control. However,
traveling in a group is a very good opportunity to work as a team member but it cannot help us
to refresh ourselvesretrieve our energy.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.12.01/Travel.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group
led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Maybe we can say that, the most memorable events for each person have been happened in
on his journeys. In traveling, we are developing our ability to transform in difficult situations.
Trips are putting us in a resting state and When we are straggling with annoying life problems,
they can inject energy into our body cells. At the end of each trip, we will have achieved some
outstanding experiences which could help us in the future to cope with our life stressors as well
as possible. As I think journeys have to give us the sense of self-control so I believe that
traveling by a tour guide not only makes you more dependent but also dealing with a group can
makes you more tired.
For example, a man who is traveling by on his own/by himself should manage his money along
his journey to afford his expenses. He has to schedule his departure and reach the hotel
accurately. He has to look into the map and search to find astonishing places. he can make a
decision more freely but he will learn to pay his decision’s cost. All of this will lead to having
self-efficacy more and more.
On the other side, when a supervisor is a coordinator, we will lose a wide range of decisions.
We have to inhibit ourselves sometimes, to be adapt with to the group. you are always aware
of somebody's presence who can support you in unexpected conditions. By contrast,Despite
this when you are alone, you consciously know that the only person who is able to cope with
unprecedented incidents harness disasters is yourself.
Eventually, I guess traveling without a group leader can improve our skills in managing
money/budget, problem-solving and its final gain is the sense of self-control. However,
traveling in a group is a very good opportunity to work as a team member but it cannot help us
to refresh ourselvesretrieve our energy.
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>