FridaysGMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم
تلفن: 42-88679341https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/497-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-03-022024-05-04T15:17:19+00:00IELTSTOEFLCENTERinfo@ieltstoeflcenter.comJoomla! - Open Source Content ManagementAmir G, Agriculture2020-05-22T12:14:03+00:002020-05-22T12:14:03+00:00https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/497-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-03-02/3561-amir-g-agricultureHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.02/Amir G, Agriculture.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this case? What can be done about this problem?
Despite the major developments during the last couple of decades, many a person is still
suffering from hunger across the globe. There are a variety of reasons behind this lifethreatening issue which demand drastic measures or else, it will continue taking its toll
exponentially.
Thanks to the new improvements in the cultivation of crops in most parts of the world
farmers are producing many more products than what they planted/cultivated earlier, but
regrettably owing to the wrong policies still many people do not have enough food to eat.
Encouraging people to eat more, transnational corporations are always looking for more
benefits by more creating demands. Eye-catching advertisements are typical examples of
such wrong policies which perhaps lead to the growth of consumerism. The more people eat
in developed countries, the less remains for individuals in under-developed areas.
To address this significant problem, officials can enlighten members of society about this
growing plight thereby striking a balance between actual need and food consumption in
developed countries. Moreover, advanced countries can train underdeveloped farmers in
poor conditions to benefit from the improved methods in agriculture such as optimized
irrigation or modern farming. Gone are the days when farmers could grow their products
with traditional methods.
From what has been discussed above, hunger cannot be eradicated completely unless large
industrial companies change their policies asking people not to have more than their body
needs, and besides that academic communities can cooperation cooperate in training farmers
with new methods of farming to increase their products/crop yield.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.02/Amir G, Agriculture.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this case? What can be done about this problem?
Despite the major developments during the last couple of decades, many a person is still
suffering from hunger across the globe. There are a variety of reasons behind this lifethreatening issue which demand drastic measures or else, it will continue taking its toll
exponentially.
Thanks to the new improvements in the cultivation of crops in most parts of the world
farmers are producing many more products than what they planted/cultivated earlier, but
regrettably owing to the wrong policies still many people do not have enough food to eat.
Encouraging people to eat more, transnational corporations are always looking for more
benefits by more creating demands. Eye-catching advertisements are typical examples of
such wrong policies which perhaps lead to the growth of consumerism. The more people eat
in developed countries, the less remains for individuals in under-developed areas.
To address this significant problem, officials can enlighten members of society about this
growing plight thereby striking a balance between actual need and food consumption in
developed countries. Moreover, advanced countries can train underdeveloped farmers in
poor conditions to benefit from the improved methods in agriculture such as optimized
irrigation or modern farming. Gone are the days when farmers could grow their products
with traditional methods.
From what has been discussed above, hunger cannot be eradicated completely unless large
industrial companies change their policies asking people not to have more than their body
needs, and besides that academic communities can cooperation cooperate in training farmers
with new methods of farming to increase their products/crop yield.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Bahareh Zolghadr, Discussion and Opinion2020-05-22T12:13:52+00:002020-05-22T12:13:52+00:00https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/497-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-03-02/3560-bahareh-zolghadr-discussion-and-opinionHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.02/Bahareh Zolghadr, Discussion and Opinion.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of
the old houses in the local areas, while others think that people
should have freedom to build houses of their own styles. Discuss both
views and give your own opinion.
There are different views on the style of houses that are erected(to be
erected) in neighborhood .While some think argue/maintain that new
houses should be built in the same design as old ones, others believe
that freedom should be given to individuals to construct houses of their
own design (and favoured taste) .(I agree with the second view, and I
would argue on both points of view and .)
On one side of the argument there are some people who think that
new houses which is are built should blend in with the existing
architectural style of a local area. In terms of the tangible cultural
heritage of a small towns or villages,. Traditional houses maintain the
spirit of their culture and custom , and they give a strong sense of
identity to the locality. , Whereas whereas contemporary design of
houses and even high-rise buildings are incompatible with old one.
From an architectural perspective, modern houses alongside traditional
dwellings are an eyesore. As a result , a local area may lose its standard
of aesthetics hence local dwellers would not be able tohave enjoy the
view of the vicinity.
On the other hand, some believe that local authorities should permit
individuals to build houses with their own architectural design (should
permit individuals to have the right to opt for their architectural design
freely).People also tend to dismiss traditional ideas in terms of building
costs. To be more precise, traditional construction materials like giant
natural stones from local quarries are difficult to excavate and also is
expensive . Furthermore , the maintenance cost of houses constructed
in the old ways tends to be higher compared with modern ones.In conclusion , it is believed by some people that it is essential to give
individuals a the freedom to build their own style of house , meanwhile
others argue that building of current home should follow a uniform
traditional style . I personally agree with the first opinion.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.02/Bahareh Zolghadr, Discussion and Opinion.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of
the old houses in the local areas, while others think that people
should have freedom to build houses of their own styles. Discuss both
views and give your own opinion.
There are different views on the style of houses that are erected(to be
erected) in neighborhood .While some think argue/maintain that new
houses should be built in the same design as old ones, others believe
that freedom should be given to individuals to construct houses of their
own design (and favoured taste) .(I agree with the second view, and I
would argue on both points of view and .)
On one side of the argument there are some people who think that
new houses which is are built should blend in with the existing
architectural style of a local area. In terms of the tangible cultural
heritage of a small towns or villages,. Traditional houses maintain the
spirit of their culture and custom , and they give a strong sense of
identity to the locality. , Whereas whereas contemporary design of
houses and even high-rise buildings are incompatible with old one.
From an architectural perspective, modern houses alongside traditional
dwellings are an eyesore. As a result , a local area may lose its standard
of aesthetics hence local dwellers would not be able tohave enjoy the
view of the vicinity.
On the other hand, some believe that local authorities should permit
individuals to build houses with their own architectural design (should
permit individuals to have the right to opt for their architectural design
freely).People also tend to dismiss traditional ideas in terms of building
costs. To be more precise, traditional construction materials like giant
natural stones from local quarries are difficult to excavate and also is
expensive . Furthermore , the maintenance cost of houses constructed
in the old ways tends to be higher compared with modern ones.In conclusion , it is believed by some people that it is essential to give
individuals a the freedom to build their own style of house , meanwhile
others argue that building of current home should follow a uniform
traditional style . I personally agree with the first opinion.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Faranak, Attention Spans2020-05-22T12:13:41+00:002020-05-22T12:13:41+00:00https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/497-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-03-02/3559-faranak-attention-spansHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.02/Faranak, Attention Spans.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
The concerned parents and teachers of an elementary school have decided to ban the usage of computers owing to
diminishing of the students’ attention spans. To support this claim the author pointed out no evidences and statistics.
Since nowadays society would not accept anyone who has not the ability to work with technology, the chief aim of each
school must be educating the children in the best ways. Therefore, I find this arguments logically unconvincing in several
respects.
An obvious flaw in this argument is that there is no measurement in it. The author cites no credible facts in order to make
any sound recommendations. When a group wants to ban a possibility for a school thoroughly, they should study the
situation with statistical factors, consider possible different assumptions, then draw a conclusion. For instance, there is
not any mention about the length of usage of computers by students in hours. Or how many students spend time on
computers? Do all of the students waste their time by on computer games or do they try to overcome the wanting
knowledge of their teachers. This lacking of information leads this argument to an unpersuasive recommendations.
Even assuming that modern technology is the reason of shorter children’s attention spans, nowadays with internet
children become more clever. They can find any information in “Wikipedia”. It will help them to study/pursue
education/educate faster. Robing the children of this opportunity is neither possible or fair. Without accounting for these
obvious facts the committee cannot assume that removing computers is the only possible solution for increasing the
attention of students. Planing / planning
Another compelling arguments against this decision is that it did not mention, whether computers abvailability being
available in all places, is the problem of diminishing the attention or not. Can it be corrected by limiting the accessibility
of them to the designated areas? This is mainly because if using computers in some special places can help students
improve the attention, there is no need to ban the whole possibility. The administration can limit the places of computers
and let the twenty-first-century students, the internet generation, learn with technology.
to sum up, what elaborated above shows that the author’s evidence lends little credible support to persuade me that
banning a whole elementary school from using modern technology which is a new way of learning, is the only possible
recommendation for improving students’ attention spans. The committee needs to provide more and clear assumptionsthat the children can focus better without technology. We need more information to evaluate the committee’s claim
better. We need statistics and charts in order to decide clearly for this important decision.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.02/Faranak, Attention Spans.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
The concerned parents and teachers of an elementary school have decided to ban the usage of computers owing to
diminishing of the students’ attention spans. To support this claim the author pointed out no evidences and statistics.
Since nowadays society would not accept anyone who has not the ability to work with technology, the chief aim of each
school must be educating the children in the best ways. Therefore, I find this arguments logically unconvincing in several
respects.
An obvious flaw in this argument is that there is no measurement in it. The author cites no credible facts in order to make
any sound recommendations. When a group wants to ban a possibility for a school thoroughly, they should study the
situation with statistical factors, consider possible different assumptions, then draw a conclusion. For instance, there is
not any mention about the length of usage of computers by students in hours. Or how many students spend time on
computers? Do all of the students waste their time by on computer games or do they try to overcome the wanting
knowledge of their teachers. This lacking of information leads this argument to an unpersuasive recommendations.
Even assuming that modern technology is the reason of shorter children’s attention spans, nowadays with internet
children become more clever. They can find any information in “Wikipedia”. It will help them to study/pursue
education/educate faster. Robing the children of this opportunity is neither possible or fair. Without accounting for these
obvious facts the committee cannot assume that removing computers is the only possible solution for increasing the
attention of students. Planing / planning
Another compelling arguments against this decision is that it did not mention, whether computers abvailability being
available in all places, is the problem of diminishing the attention or not. Can it be corrected by limiting the accessibility
of them to the designated areas? This is mainly because if using computers in some special places can help students
improve the attention, there is no need to ban the whole possibility. The administration can limit the places of computers
and let the twenty-first-century students, the internet generation, learn with technology.
to sum up, what elaborated above shows that the author’s evidence lends little credible support to persuade me that
banning a whole elementary school from using modern technology which is a new way of learning, is the only possible
recommendation for improving students’ attention spans. The committee needs to provide more and clear assumptionsthat the children can focus better without technology. We need more information to evaluate the committee’s claim
better. We need statistics and charts in order to decide clearly for this important decision.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Forough, Economic2020-05-22T12:13:30+00:002020-05-22T12:13:30+00:00https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/497-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-03-02/3558-forough-economicHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.02/Forough, Economic.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Countries with long average working hours are economically more successful than those
countries which do not work long hours.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In some developed countries working long shifts is regarded to be entirely conventional. In
fact, there is an opinion that working long hours is the major key why they are more
prosperous than other countries with briefer working hours. However, I partially agree with
this.
Some countries believe that having a developed economic is directly associated with long
working hours. working for approximately 8 hours a day, for instance, can lead to a wealthy
economy, since a lot of efforts and energy is needed for a country to be economically
powerful and unrivaled in the world. Moreover, they also claimedclaim, working for long
hours increase the productivity of their countries and this can allow them to boost their
economy. take China as an example for being the second greatest economy in the world, one
of the main reasons is because of long hours working. Moreover, Chinese workers are
constantly working. Although, this it is argued that another factors for this universal success
are cheap labors and also low-cost goods and services.
Conversely, other countries believe that lengthy working hours does not always guarantee
economic booming and also productivity. They believed When workers and staff are obliged
to work a lot, they might lose energy, so they cannot do their responsibilities as well as they
can. They have less sufficient time for themselves during a week and therefore, this
sedentary sort of life can lead to less satisfaction among its residents. The statics have shown
us (revealed) that, staffers have been perturbation perturbed and stressed because of long
hours working which by the by has significant impact on their quality of life. Moreover, there
are some countries with normal average working hours that have high Gross Domestic
Production (GDP).
In a nutshell, I strongly believed that there are some vital factors such as quality of working
which can cause the growth of the economy.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.02/Forough, Economic.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Countries with long average working hours are economically more successful than those
countries which do not work long hours.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In some developed countries working long shifts is regarded to be entirely conventional. In
fact, there is an opinion that working long hours is the major key why they are more
prosperous than other countries with briefer working hours. However, I partially agree with
this.
Some countries believe that having a developed economic is directly associated with long
working hours. working for approximately 8 hours a day, for instance, can lead to a wealthy
economy, since a lot of efforts and energy is needed for a country to be economically
powerful and unrivaled in the world. Moreover, they also claimedclaim, working for long
hours increase the productivity of their countries and this can allow them to boost their
economy. take China as an example for being the second greatest economy in the world, one
of the main reasons is because of long hours working. Moreover, Chinese workers are
constantly working. Although, this it is argued that another factors for this universal success
are cheap labors and also low-cost goods and services.
Conversely, other countries believe that lengthy working hours does not always guarantee
economic booming and also productivity. They believed When workers and staff are obliged
to work a lot, they might lose energy, so they cannot do their responsibilities as well as they
can. They have less sufficient time for themselves during a week and therefore, this
sedentary sort of life can lead to less satisfaction among its residents. The statics have shown
us (revealed) that, staffers have been perturbation perturbed and stressed because of long
hours working which by the by has significant impact on their quality of life. Moreover, there
are some countries with normal average working hours that have high Gross Domestic
Production (GDP).
In a nutshell, I strongly believed that there are some vital factors such as quality of working
which can cause the growth of the economy.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Open Plan Design2020-05-22T12:13:19+00:002020-05-22T12:13:19+00:00https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/497-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-03-02/3557-open-plan-designHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.02/Open Plan Design.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Nowadays, a lot of buildings, such as offices and schools, are now being built with an open plan design.
Why is that?
Do you see this as a positive or negative development?
These days, many structures like offices, and schools which are now being built with an open plan
design. In my opinion, the main reason is that economically open designs is are extremely efficient, but
this progress can be positive or negative as it will include including advantages and disadvantages.
The main advantage of open design buildings as I mentioned, is efficiency, for instance, you can
accommodate a lot of workforces in a big hall, and you do not have to pay for rooms’ decoration with
doors, windows or other facilities when you can design offices just by desks and chairs. It will also
reduce the overhead costs dramatically. On the other hand, communication between staff, and
superiors will be more convenient which can make the company more productive. Besides, staffs can
have better interpersonal skills, . as a result, you will have more effective management and
collaboration.
There will be disadvantages with open design buildings as well, for instance, the staff will not have the
privacy that they need, or they may not feel security when they do not have privet places especially
when they have been overlooked exposed toby their colleagues all the time. The other negative point
which is inevitable is, this kind of buildings are noisier than closed plan offices when employees have a
conversation on the phone, or to each other in one time, it is not only noisy, it can distract their
colleagues as well. As a result, open design buildings could be good progress in many ways, especially
economically, but it is vital that how the design is donewill be designing, and for what kind of company.
I know that where she lives.
I know that how you live can determine your health.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.02/Open Plan Design.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Nowadays, a lot of buildings, such as offices and schools, are now being built with an open plan design.
Why is that?
Do you see this as a positive or negative development?
These days, many structures like offices, and schools which are now being built with an open plan
design. In my opinion, the main reason is that economically open designs is are extremely efficient, but
this progress can be positive or negative as it will include including advantages and disadvantages.
The main advantage of open design buildings as I mentioned, is efficiency, for instance, you can
accommodate a lot of workforces in a big hall, and you do not have to pay for rooms’ decoration with
doors, windows or other facilities when you can design offices just by desks and chairs. It will also
reduce the overhead costs dramatically. On the other hand, communication between staff, and
superiors will be more convenient which can make the company more productive. Besides, staffs can
have better interpersonal skills, . as a result, you will have more effective management and
collaboration.
There will be disadvantages with open design buildings as well, for instance, the staff will not have the
privacy that they need, or they may not feel security when they do not have privet places especially
when they have been overlooked exposed toby their colleagues all the time. The other negative point
which is inevitable is, this kind of buildings are noisier than closed plan offices when employees have a
conversation on the phone, or to each other in one time, it is not only noisy, it can distract their
colleagues as well. As a result, open design buildings could be good progress in many ways, especially
economically, but it is vital that how the design is donewill be designing, and for what kind of company.
I know that where she lives.
I know that how you live can determine your health.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Taking Care of Children2020-05-22T12:13:09+00:002020-05-22T12:13:09+00:00https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/497-fridays-writing-workshop-1399/writing-workshop-friday-99-03-02/3556-taking-care-of-childrenHamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.02/Taking Care of Children.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people take the view that older children can take care of younger children, some others may hold
the view that taking care of children should be done by other adults. Which view do you agree with?
Why?
Children bring joy and happiness, but it is only possible through the special care they receive in a
nurturing environment. As older children can be a perfect partner in playing games with their younger
siblings or relatives, they may also be considered a perfect option for taking care of them. While some
believe that older children can look after younger ones, I think that the whole responsibility shoulders
on fully grown adults because of their physical abilities, maturity and legal duties.
First of all, taking care of a child is not only limited to spending some time with them, but also requires
one’s physical strength. For example, as danger is always threatening young children, leaving them alone
while playing has never been a good idea. Prevention of the incidence of Happening an accident while
playing necessitates measures to be taken. If a child breaks his/her hand, a person who is physically
strong is needed to grab and hold them while taking them to the hospital. Besides, as children cry
because of various reasons, for some of them, hugging remains the only option to calm them down.
Therefore, the more an adult is physically powerful, the better reaction they show in vital situations.
Moreover, maturity comes with age. As children grow, their needs differ from time to time. This can
burden a huge responsibility on caregivers. The more adults are knowledgeable about a child’s demands
for a healthier life, the better capable they capable are in of managing upcoming challenges.
Furthermore, taking care of children is not limited to their basic needs, which demands well-spend spent
time playing with them and helping them to develop mentally. Sometimes children may engage in a
fight, so only a sensible adult can handle the situation while teaching problem-solving skills. As a
consequence, not only is the physical presence of an adult is not enough, but also their intellectual
abilities are vital so that children’s mental health would be guaranteed.
Finally, each society has defined some principles to boost children’s quality of life. Law establishments
are provided in the case of negligence by caregivers or other legal guardians. For instance, in the case
that older children are given the responsibility to take care of their younger siblings, every incident that
threatens their safety can lead to adverse consequences such as legal punishment for parents or other
main caregivers. As a result, the more rules are set strictly in the case of child caregiving, the more
adults may take them seriously and the probability of such happenings will decrease.
To sum up, I believe that adults should hold the responsibility of taking care of children. I suggest that
policy makers relax the rules, giving more off time to their employees when it is comes to taking care of
children, because in this way adults show instant reactions in times of need, children develop mental
skills and the chances for accidents decrease.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<body>
<table width="80%" border="1" align="center">
<tr>
<td><p align="center" dir="rtl"><font color="#FF0000" size="+3">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</font></p><p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1399/Writing Workshop Friday 99.03.02/Taking Care of Children.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p>
<p align="left" dir="ltr">
Some people take the view that older children can take care of younger children, some others may hold
the view that taking care of children should be done by other adults. Which view do you agree with?
Why?
Children bring joy and happiness, but it is only possible through the special care they receive in a
nurturing environment. As older children can be a perfect partner in playing games with their younger
siblings or relatives, they may also be considered a perfect option for taking care of them. While some
believe that older children can look after younger ones, I think that the whole responsibility shoulders
on fully grown adults because of their physical abilities, maturity and legal duties.
First of all, taking care of a child is not only limited to spending some time with them, but also requires
one’s physical strength. For example, as danger is always threatening young children, leaving them alone
while playing has never been a good idea. Prevention of the incidence of Happening an accident while
playing necessitates measures to be taken. If a child breaks his/her hand, a person who is physically
strong is needed to grab and hold them while taking them to the hospital. Besides, as children cry
because of various reasons, for some of them, hugging remains the only option to calm them down.
Therefore, the more an adult is physically powerful, the better reaction they show in vital situations.
Moreover, maturity comes with age. As children grow, their needs differ from time to time. This can
burden a huge responsibility on caregivers. The more adults are knowledgeable about a child’s demands
for a healthier life, the better capable they capable are in of managing upcoming challenges.
Furthermore, taking care of children is not limited to their basic needs, which demands well-spend spent
time playing with them and helping them to develop mentally. Sometimes children may engage in a
fight, so only a sensible adult can handle the situation while teaching problem-solving skills. As a
consequence, not only is the physical presence of an adult is not enough, but also their intellectual
abilities are vital so that children’s mental health would be guaranteed.
Finally, each society has defined some principles to boost children’s quality of life. Law establishments
are provided in the case of negligence by caregivers or other legal guardians. For instance, in the case
that older children are given the responsibility to take care of their younger siblings, every incident that
threatens their safety can lead to adverse consequences such as legal punishment for parents or other
main caregivers. As a result, the more rules are set strictly in the case of child caregiving, the more
adults may take them seriously and the probability of such happenings will decrease.
To sum up, I believe that adults should hold the responsibility of taking care of children. I suggest that
policy makers relax the rules, giving more off time to their employees when it is comes to taking care of
children, because in this way adults show instant reactions in times of need, children develop mental
skills and the chances for accidents decrease.
</p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>