Fridays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/386-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-12-03 2024-04-29T03:51:58+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Alireza Nekouasl, Internet 2019-02-22T12:01:55+00:00 2019-02-22T12:01:55+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/386-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-12-03/2768-alireza-nekouasl-internet Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Alireza Nekouasl, Internet.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Mobile phones and the internet have made it easier to stay in contact with other people .however, as a lot of time is spent using telephones and computers, there is less face-to-face contact and direct communication. Is the growing use of communications technology a positive or a negative development for society? …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ….... Today, cellphones, computers, social networks and virtual world help people have an easier contact when far from each other and on the other hand overusing this communications technology cause people drifting apart from each other when they gathering together in one place for meeting. In my point of view, although the computers and mobile phones have advantages but overusing of these devices has disadvantages. If we remembered a few years ago when we wanted to found find and had contacted our families or friends, we forced to use a telephone in our homes and if he or she was not behind the line in his or her homes we could not communicate with him or her. But today, mobile phone is one of the useful inventions helping people finding each other and have contact whenever their they want. Computers, laptops, are design to installing software and program help people do their works or projects easier or make it possible by email to contact with manager, office or universities. Also there is another application that computers have for children to playing games. On the other hand, some people have become addicted to their devices, when these people gathering with their families or friends in any places, they staring to their screens and do not have any communications with the others. In conclusion, mobile phones and computers or whatever help people to contact each other are produce to make it easier communications and it is very important to everyone to using it in right moments and places and avoid from overusing them.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Alireza Nekouasl, Internet.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Mobile phones and the internet have made it easier to stay in contact with other people .however, as a lot of time is spent using telephones and computers, there is less face-to-face contact and direct communication. Is the growing use of communications technology a positive or a negative development for society? …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ….... Today, cellphones, computers, social networks and virtual world help people have an easier contact when far from each other and on the other hand overusing this communications technology cause people drifting apart from each other when they gathering together in one place for meeting. In my point of view, although the computers and mobile phones have advantages but overusing of these devices has disadvantages. If we remembered a few years ago when we wanted to found find and had contacted our families or friends, we forced to use a telephone in our homes and if he or she was not behind the line in his or her homes we could not communicate with him or her. But today, mobile phone is one of the useful inventions helping people finding each other and have contact whenever their they want. Computers, laptops, are design to installing software and program help people do their works or projects easier or make it possible by email to contact with manager, office or universities. Also there is another application that computers have for children to playing games. On the other hand, some people have become addicted to their devices, when these people gathering with their families or friends in any places, they staring to their screens and do not have any communications with the others. In conclusion, mobile phones and computers or whatever help people to contact each other are produce to make it easier communications and it is very important to everyone to using it in right moments and places and avoid from overusing them.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Amir G, Public Libraries 2019-02-22T12:01:42+00:00 2019-02-22T12:01:42+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/386-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-12-03/2767-amir-g-public-libraries Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Amir G, Public Libraries.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Nowadays some people think that public libraries are not necessary, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion and examples. There has been widespread heated debate over the necessity of having public libraries or by the advent of the Internet and online libraries it is time to rethink about such an important place. When it comes to this notion, I hold the idea that although many people have access to the Internet, many books and article are protected by copyright, therefore it is not high time to replace the Internet with the traditional public libraries. A majority of people argue that gone are the days we needed public libraries. They maintain that since the dawn of new technologies such as electronic libraries or online encyclopedias the role of traditional libraries has become less and less important. The more the penetration index of the Internet, the lower the usage of public libraries. Fed up of long waiting list of limited paper books, even loyal members of traditional libraries these days are finding most of what they used to find only at public libraries at the online libraries easily by their smart phones even in their dead time. On the other hand, others, however, claim that not all people access the online resources, hence the importance of public libraries. They hold the idea that not only are many updated materials protected by copyright, but also many a person across the globe does not access online facilities. Arguably, public libraries in such areas plays a pivotal role in increasing mass awareness, and broadening populace’s horizons living in less developed countries. By way of conclusion, I believe libraries are chief pillars of a civilized society without which raising public awareness seems impossible or at least hard to achieve. Perhaps both types of libraries are significant bases of a fruitful society, but as far as I am concerned, traditional public libraries are still needed, and, though hard, it is about time authorities refurbished such an otherwise perfect place benefiting people both traditional and modern research facilities.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Amir G, Public Libraries.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Nowadays some people think that public libraries are not necessary, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion and examples. There has been widespread heated debate over the necessity of having public libraries or by the advent of the Internet and online libraries it is time to rethink about such an important place. When it comes to this notion, I hold the idea that although many people have access to the Internet, many books and article are protected by copyright, therefore it is not high time to replace the Internet with the traditional public libraries. A majority of people argue that gone are the days we needed public libraries. They maintain that since the dawn of new technologies such as electronic libraries or online encyclopedias the role of traditional libraries has become less and less important. The more the penetration index of the Internet, the lower the usage of public libraries. Fed up of long waiting list of limited paper books, even loyal members of traditional libraries these days are finding most of what they used to find only at public libraries at the online libraries easily by their smart phones even in their dead time. On the other hand, others, however, claim that not all people access the online resources, hence the importance of public libraries. They hold the idea that not only are many updated materials protected by copyright, but also many a person across the globe does not access online facilities. Arguably, public libraries in such areas plays a pivotal role in increasing mass awareness, and broadening populace’s horizons living in less developed countries. By way of conclusion, I believe libraries are chief pillars of a civilized society without which raising public awareness seems impossible or at least hard to achieve. Perhaps both types of libraries are significant bases of a fruitful society, but as far as I am concerned, traditional public libraries are still needed, and, though hard, it is about time authorities refurbished such an otherwise perfect place benefiting people both traditional and modern research facilities.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Beheshteh, Many Choices 2019-02-22T12:01:31+00:00 2019-02-22T12:01:31+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/386-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-12-03/2766-beheshteh-many-choices Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Beheshteh, Many Choices.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people thinks that we have too many choices these days. To what extent do you agree. In comparison with some decades ago, living in an ever- progressing world, have faced men with variety of choices. Most of us might have heard that the more, the merrier, but would this fit in with all situations? In other words, could all people pick up the value of their options, while there are too many of them on hand these days? Huge advances in technology and education has brought vast range of options in its wake, which sometimes could have significant effects on our life where we have to choose only one. Sometimes the choice goes for death and life, in hospitals, for examples. People might be asked to choose what treat to be done on their patients which is not challenging per se, but when the result is not precise beforehand, and doctors might claim that there even could be death by the end, barely would they be able to decide to carry on or let their loved ones live even one day longer, though with the disease. Psychologists revealed that those who had not been offered by choices are more likely to come up with the difficulty of the result compared to those who were to choose. However, the story does not end here, the challenging state of affairs has found its way into our very simple daily life. Today, we are encountered with one single type of product in different brands which seemingly are appealing for some reasons. Being bewildered which one to choose, people might feel confused and exhausted. Consider you are in a supermarket intended to choose a bottle of milk amongst five rows of offering organic milk, additional D3 vitamin, flavored ones or even more in different colors and packaging, which is a repeating scenario in other items as well. Thanks to the progresses of our lives, we are asked for our options comparatively more than before, albeit sometimes it ends up in confusion and fatigue as well as regrets for what we have chosen or we could.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Beheshteh, Many Choices.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people thinks that we have too many choices these days. To what extent do you agree. In comparison with some decades ago, living in an ever- progressing world, have faced men with variety of choices. Most of us might have heard that the more, the merrier, but would this fit in with all situations? In other words, could all people pick up the value of their options, while there are too many of them on hand these days? Huge advances in technology and education has brought vast range of options in its wake, which sometimes could have significant effects on our life where we have to choose only one. Sometimes the choice goes for death and life, in hospitals, for examples. People might be asked to choose what treat to be done on their patients which is not challenging per se, but when the result is not precise beforehand, and doctors might claim that there even could be death by the end, barely would they be able to decide to carry on or let their loved ones live even one day longer, though with the disease. Psychologists revealed that those who had not been offered by choices are more likely to come up with the difficulty of the result compared to those who were to choose. However, the story does not end here, the challenging state of affairs has found its way into our very simple daily life. Today, we are encountered with one single type of product in different brands which seemingly are appealing for some reasons. Being bewildered which one to choose, people might feel confused and exhausted. Consider you are in a supermarket intended to choose a bottle of milk amongst five rows of offering organic milk, additional D3 vitamin, flavored ones or even more in different colors and packaging, which is a repeating scenario in other items as well. Thanks to the progresses of our lives, we are asked for our options comparatively more than before, albeit sometimes it ends up in confusion and fatigue as well as regrets for what we have chosen or we could.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Education System 2019-02-22T12:01:18+00:00 2019-02-22T12:01:18+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/386-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-12-03/2765-education-system Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Education System.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think that education systems round the world undermine creativity. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Many Parents still have major influence on a child’s decision to pursue science careers irrespective of what their interests or talents are. Our education system is also predicated on the idea of academic ability. Hence, instead of helping students flourishing their talents in various ways, education system squander their ability pretty ruthlessly. One of the major problems with schools is that they stigmatize mistakes. National education has run where mistakes are the worst thing children can make and the result is that kids are educated out of their creative capacities. There is a raft of research show that if people are not prepared to be wrong, we will never come up with anything original. What is obvious is that if children do not know about something they will have a go. They are not frightened of being wrong. What is more, every education system has the same hierarchy of subjects. At the top are mathematics and the bottom are the arts. The hierarchy is rooted on tow ideas. Firstly, the most useful subjects for work are at the top. So children are probably steered benignly away from things they liked at school. Secondly, academic ability which is really come to dominate our view of intelligence, because the universities design the system in their image. The whole system of public education around the word is a protracted process of university entrance. And the consequence is that many highly talented, think they are not so because the thing they were good at school was not valued, or was actually stigmatized. To put it in a nutshell, my contention is that education system should value talents and creativities regardless if of whether the talent is academically or not. Education system is meant to take us into future that we cannot grasp. As the need of future societies is unpredictable, we need all kinds of talents to be flourished.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Education System.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think that education systems round the world undermine creativity. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Many Parents still have major influence on a child’s decision to pursue science careers irrespective of what their interests or talents are. Our education system is also predicated on the idea of academic ability. Hence, instead of helping students flourishing their talents in various ways, education system squander their ability pretty ruthlessly. One of the major problems with schools is that they stigmatize mistakes. National education has run where mistakes are the worst thing children can make and the result is that kids are educated out of their creative capacities. There is a raft of research show that if people are not prepared to be wrong, we will never come up with anything original. What is obvious is that if children do not know about something they will have a go. They are not frightened of being wrong. What is more, every education system has the same hierarchy of subjects. At the top are mathematics and the bottom are the arts. The hierarchy is rooted on tow ideas. Firstly, the most useful subjects for work are at the top. So children are probably steered benignly away from things they liked at school. Secondly, academic ability which is really come to dominate our view of intelligence, because the universities design the system in their image. The whole system of public education around the word is a protracted process of university entrance. And the consequence is that many highly talented, think they are not so because the thing they were good at school was not valued, or was actually stigmatized. To put it in a nutshell, my contention is that education system should value talents and creativities regardless if of whether the talent is academically or not. Education system is meant to take us into future that we cannot grasp. As the need of future societies is unpredictable, we need all kinds of talents to be flourished.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Hamidreza Ghanbari, Similarity in Worldwide 2019-02-22T12:01:05+00:00 2019-02-22T12:01:05+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/386-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-12-03/2764-hamidreza-ghanbari-similarity-in-worldwide Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Hamidreza Ghanbari, Similarity in Worldwide.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development? At this point in time, hardly, do individuals could recognize the other’s nationalities, on account of the fact that they are extremely resemble each other. This phenomenon, however, leads societies to be poised on the brink of the a disaster. Although advocates of this practice attribute that to the concept of “global village”, it brings about a large number of goods be imported into countries, some of which contradict the social convention of the destinations, and eventually so called “culture invasion” would emerge in the near future in these countries. Besides, it could jeopardise a nation’s identity, given that the masses are enormously partial to follow the latest trend of fashion, which is not aligned with their tradition, the significance that is nowadays tend to be ignored. On the other hand, this phenomenon would attenuate the domestic commodities without a doubt. That is to say, producers would financially afflicted, and consequently countries will face an ailing economy. It has been observed worldwide that numerous local companies undergo the dispiriting experience of the bankruptcy. Moreover, creativity is narrowed to the particular experts, who invent novel items for the enterprises, which dominate a vast number of countries. This fact would play an important role in decrease of the job vacancies, which similarly could prejudice the economy of the countries, let alone entity’s sprits. In conclusion, contrary to the some socialists who cite that this recently occurred event will lay a groundwork for development of thenations, it poses insurmountable threads, some of which would cause breakdown of communities in cultural and economic spheres.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Hamidreza Ghanbari, Similarity in Worldwide.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development? At this point in time, hardly, do individuals could recognize the other’s nationalities, on account of the fact that they are extremely resemble each other. This phenomenon, however, leads societies to be poised on the brink of the a disaster. Although advocates of this practice attribute that to the concept of “global village”, it brings about a large number of goods be imported into countries, some of which contradict the social convention of the destinations, and eventually so called “culture invasion” would emerge in the near future in these countries. Besides, it could jeopardise a nation’s identity, given that the masses are enormously partial to follow the latest trend of fashion, which is not aligned with their tradition, the significance that is nowadays tend to be ignored. On the other hand, this phenomenon would attenuate the domestic commodities without a doubt. That is to say, producers would financially afflicted, and consequently countries will face an ailing economy. It has been observed worldwide that numerous local companies undergo the dispiriting experience of the bankruptcy. Moreover, creativity is narrowed to the particular experts, who invent novel items for the enterprises, which dominate a vast number of countries. This fact would play an important role in decrease of the job vacancies, which similarly could prejudice the economy of the countries, let alone entity’s sprits. In conclusion, contrary to the some socialists who cite that this recently occurred event will lay a groundwork for development of thenations, it poses insurmountable threads, some of which would cause breakdown of communities in cultural and economic spheres.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Iman, Attending to University Classes 2019-02-22T12:00:52+00:00 2019-02-22T12:00:52+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/386-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-12-03/2763-iman-attending-to-university-classes Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Iman, Attending to University Classes.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes. Others believe that going to classes should be optional for students. Which point of view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer. It has been a long time that attending to classes has introduced itself as an irrevocable prerequisite of educating process which needs to be met by every single student. However, there are many opponents, particularly amongst students, who prefer to leave the choice of going to classes to students themselves. As far as I am concerned, we must to further the educating systems by striking a balance here. Undoubtedly, there are many acquisitions in physical presence in classes like taking advantage of easy learning from the people who spend their very time studying a special issue. Almost all of the students have been engaged with reading those contiguous materials ages of time while they were easily understandable through the teachers talk. Consequently, this access to lecturers enables students to make communications with either teachers and their peers which not only hones their debate skills but also expands their social networks. Prima facie all of it will equip students to start their next journey in life; jobs. But the flip side of the coin leads us to face the priceless time which wastes in this method. I can count dozens of teachers whom I found inferior than the average of classes in term knowledge and even disposition unfortunately, by which I mean there is nothing to learn in such classes. Moreover, it is time to get more acquainted with the nature of university. Although it represents itself as a step after schools, it shares a disparate sprit totally with them. In a way that the whole system is designed to gradually saturate the role of supervising instead of teaching and encourage students seeking knowledge nor to imbibe them with passive information flowing out of teachers’ mouth. Above all, I personally have found voluntary classes more populated than those of mandatory ones. To put it in a nutshell, maybe it is necessary to observe newcomers as school students in universities but the schooling atmosphere should give its place to the university s’ step by step, assuming that students are matured enough to be able handling their educating and if not they should learn this rather than vastly available materials on other media like books, articles and even lectures on the internet.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Iman, Attending to University Classes.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes. Others believe that going to classes should be optional for students. Which point of view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer. It has been a long time that attending to classes has introduced itself as an irrevocable prerequisite of educating process which needs to be met by every single student. However, there are many opponents, particularly amongst students, who prefer to leave the choice of going to classes to students themselves. As far as I am concerned, we must to further the educating systems by striking a balance here. Undoubtedly, there are many acquisitions in physical presence in classes like taking advantage of easy learning from the people who spend their very time studying a special issue. Almost all of the students have been engaged with reading those contiguous materials ages of time while they were easily understandable through the teachers talk. Consequently, this access to lecturers enables students to make communications with either teachers and their peers which not only hones their debate skills but also expands their social networks. Prima facie all of it will equip students to start their next journey in life; jobs. But the flip side of the coin leads us to face the priceless time which wastes in this method. I can count dozens of teachers whom I found inferior than the average of classes in term knowledge and even disposition unfortunately, by which I mean there is nothing to learn in such classes. Moreover, it is time to get more acquainted with the nature of university. Although it represents itself as a step after schools, it shares a disparate sprit totally with them. In a way that the whole system is designed to gradually saturate the role of supervising instead of teaching and encourage students seeking knowledge nor to imbibe them with passive information flowing out of teachers’ mouth. Above all, I personally have found voluntary classes more populated than those of mandatory ones. To put it in a nutshell, maybe it is necessary to observe newcomers as school students in universities but the schooling atmosphere should give its place to the university s’ step by step, assuming that students are matured enough to be able handling their educating and if not they should learn this rather than vastly available materials on other media like books, articles and even lectures on the internet.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Mosadegh, Increasing Production is Appropriate or Not 2019-02-22T12:00:35+00:00 2019-02-22T12:00:35+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/386-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-12-03/2762-mosadegh-increasing-production-is-appropriate-or-not Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Mosadegh, Increasing Production is Appropriate or Not.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods. To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal? Through in such a modernized and technical world, the increasing rate number of commodities is evident. There is no doubt that living in the progressive world with an excessive population requires mass production, as a resultleading to in globalization. The country which has huge natural raw resources, probably, does not need to have productive factories, while it can sell its raw materials such as oil, wood and minerals to other producers from other countries. It is true that having thrived economy needs enormous industries, but it is not an absolute way. Through expending various and countless goods, some think that money will come in to their country and it can pave the way to create some jobs opportunities for the people of their country too. The necessity of the global business is mass production. The more products each country produces, the more money achieves. The country which has the most amounts of goods with the less expenses of labors’ wages like China will win in this area. There is a direct relation between more production of commodities and thrived economy and it is also acceptable for all types of countries which have a communism communist system. As a result of this, it has been seen that the gap between poor and medium classes with high ones in society will be increasing in the near future as now it has beenis seen. Besides, there is some controversial debate between some opponents who claim that raising the gap of poor and wealthy individuals among in society due to mass production which brings about more consumption that is required to encourage ordinary people to follow new- fashions and the current trend of markets and also producing much amount of waste that needs to be disposal is not suitable for the economic systems as a whole. Within such an inevitable cycle not only should raw materials be extracted a lot, but also there is a need to use up mutual sources of energy for both production and transportation which is consequently a real threat to our planet. To sum up all the statements above, I believe that both excessive goods and consumption exacerbate our environmental issues, for instance, global warming as a result of using more fossil fuel as energy sources for factories and for transportation, the water, soil and air pollution which take their tolls on our life. Importantly, growth of commodities should not be the main reason for making creating career opportunities and an efficient economy for countries all over the world.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Mosadegh, Increasing Production is Appropriate or Not.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods. To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal? Through in such a modernized and technical world, the increasing rate number of commodities is evident. There is no doubt that living in the progressive world with an excessive population requires mass production, as a resultleading to in globalization. The country which has huge natural raw resources, probably, does not need to have productive factories, while it can sell its raw materials such as oil, wood and minerals to other producers from other countries. It is true that having thrived economy needs enormous industries, but it is not an absolute way. Through expending various and countless goods, some think that money will come in to their country and it can pave the way to create some jobs opportunities for the people of their country too. The necessity of the global business is mass production. The more products each country produces, the more money achieves. The country which has the most amounts of goods with the less expenses of labors’ wages like China will win in this area. There is a direct relation between more production of commodities and thrived economy and it is also acceptable for all types of countries which have a communism communist system. As a result of this, it has been seen that the gap between poor and medium classes with high ones in society will be increasing in the near future as now it has beenis seen. Besides, there is some controversial debate between some opponents who claim that raising the gap of poor and wealthy individuals among in society due to mass production which brings about more consumption that is required to encourage ordinary people to follow new- fashions and the current trend of markets and also producing much amount of waste that needs to be disposal is not suitable for the economic systems as a whole. Within such an inevitable cycle not only should raw materials be extracted a lot, but also there is a need to use up mutual sources of energy for both production and transportation which is consequently a real threat to our planet. To sum up all the statements above, I believe that both excessive goods and consumption exacerbate our environmental issues, for instance, global warming as a result of using more fossil fuel as energy sources for factories and for transportation, the water, soil and air pollution which take their tolls on our life. Importantly, growth of commodities should not be the main reason for making creating career opportunities and an efficient economy for countries all over the world.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Nastaran Abbasi, Diet 2019-02-22T12:00:19+00:00 2019-02-22T12:00:19+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/386-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-12-03/2761-nastaran-abbasi-diet Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Nastaran Abbasi, Diet.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole. Discuss this view and give your own opinion. Nowadays it has been more common that several groups of people prefer not to eat any kinds of fish or meat. They believe that being vegetarian or vegan brings many benefits for their health and for the world as well. In this essay, I will be discussing different points of this decision in detail. People who consume too much eat and fish will get a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases such as heart attack and high cholesterol. Eating greasy food in particular red meat can be detrimental for our health especially, for individuals suffering from obesity and diabetes. With The accumulation of fat in the arteries we may end up in with stroke. In addition, these kinds of diet might lead people to slaughter innocent animals which can make/render the ecosystem unbalanced. The higher meat consumption is, the more damage to the environment and extinction of the species is. On the other hand, many food scholars and dieticians have found that the human body needs various types of vitamins and proteins which could only obtain from the fish and meat. For instance, salmon fish generate athe certain kind of the oil that is beneficial for the blood circulation process. It is important to be ensured that people particularly teenagers in the growth age can receive enough nutrients. Although the human body needs nutritional food including vegetables, meat and fish, it is vital to be concerned with the environment and nature. We should choose a balanced diet by using the a certain amount of each food to stay healthy and in shape.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Nastaran Abbasi, Diet.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole. Discuss this view and give your own opinion. Nowadays it has been more common that several groups of people prefer not to eat any kinds of fish or meat. They believe that being vegetarian or vegan brings many benefits for their health and for the world as well. In this essay, I will be discussing different points of this decision in detail. People who consume too much eat and fish will get a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases such as heart attack and high cholesterol. Eating greasy food in particular red meat can be detrimental for our health especially, for individuals suffering from obesity and diabetes. With The accumulation of fat in the arteries we may end up in with stroke. In addition, these kinds of diet might lead people to slaughter innocent animals which can make/render the ecosystem unbalanced. The higher meat consumption is, the more damage to the environment and extinction of the species is. On the other hand, many food scholars and dieticians have found that the human body needs various types of vitamins and proteins which could only obtain from the fish and meat. For instance, salmon fish generate athe certain kind of the oil that is beneficial for the blood circulation process. It is important to be ensured that people particularly teenagers in the growth age can receive enough nutrients. Although the human body needs nutritional food including vegetables, meat and fish, it is vital to be concerned with the environment and nature. We should choose a balanced diet by using the a certain amount of each food to stay healthy and in shape.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Parisa, Using Internet or Book 2019-02-22T12:00:02+00:00 2019-02-22T12:00:02+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/386-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-12-03/2759-parisa-using-internet-or-book Hamed hamedjafari1374@gmail.com <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Parisa, Using Internet or Book.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. The internet that we use is now a very important part of our lives. Some people believe that it is better to use printed material because it can be more reliable and based on truth but some other people have the opposite idea. As far as I am concerned, using the internet is the cheapest way for searching information.The first, printed materials such as books and articles are more reliable than online sources of internet since website can be edited by anyone in the world. Sometime articles in online encyclopedias contain and biased information. However, for making books or other printed materials , we cut trees. By doing so, we increase CO2 in atmosphere. I remember when I was studying in high school, my classmates and I visited a company how made books. We saw that they use material such as papers , glue, ink and other materials. All this material are harmful for ourenvironment. Moreover, in the internet it has new information based on new research and latest sources. In my opinion, using internet is more helpful for us. The second reason that I want to mention is that using internet is cheaper and more convenient than using printed materials. Nowadays, we all use internet if you look up for something specific, you always have an opportunity to find it. Using internet is available from anywhere. For instance, I had to write an essay that I had not enough time for so I used theinternet . I had not enough time to go to the library and look for relating books. Last but not least, the internet could be access from any device. Nowadays, students are very aware of technology. They use their laptops , tablets, desktop computers and their phone to have access to the internet. With the simple fact of having internet connection they could study wherever they go and at any time. In my case, I used to study during my way to home in the bus. I spend that time studying and searching from my phone. I had avery good internet service that allowed me to reach it very faster. I had several apps that helped me to practice the material. As a conclusion, I prefer to use the internet instead of using printed material because of free books, apps and useful sources. The internet has latest information with several tools that can reached.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.12.03/Parisa, Using Internet or Book.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. The internet that we use is now a very important part of our lives. Some people believe that it is better to use printed material because it can be more reliable and based on truth but some other people have the opposite idea. As far as I am concerned, using the internet is the cheapest way for searching information.The first, printed materials such as books and articles are more reliable than online sources of internet since website can be edited by anyone in the world. Sometime articles in online encyclopedias contain and biased information. However, for making books or other printed materials , we cut trees. By doing so, we increase CO2 in atmosphere. I remember when I was studying in high school, my classmates and I visited a company how made books. We saw that they use material such as papers , glue, ink and other materials. All this material are harmful for ourenvironment. Moreover, in the internet it has new information based on new research and latest sources. In my opinion, using internet is more helpful for us. The second reason that I want to mention is that using internet is cheaper and more convenient than using printed materials. Nowadays, we all use internet if you look up for something specific, you always have an opportunity to find it. Using internet is available from anywhere. For instance, I had to write an essay that I had not enough time for so I used theinternet . I had not enough time to go to the library and look for relating books. Last but not least, the internet could be access from any device. Nowadays, students are very aware of technology. They use their laptops , tablets, desktop computers and their phone to have access to the internet. With the simple fact of having internet connection they could study wherever they go and at any time. In my case, I used to study during my way to home in the bus. I spend that time studying and searching from my phone. I had avery good internet service that allowed me to reach it very faster. I had several apps that helped me to practice the material. As a conclusion, I prefer to use the internet instead of using printed material because of free books, apps and useful sources. The internet has latest information with several tools that can reached.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>