Fridays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/350-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-07-20 2024-05-03T19:39:40+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management Computer Use, Parinaz Kajabadi 2018-10-17T07:42:21+00:00 2018-10-17T07:42:21+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/350-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-07-20/2400-computer-use-parinaz-kajabadi <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/Computer Use, Parinaz Kajabadi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">- Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on young children. - Do you agree or disagree? I tend to agree that using computers every day negatively effected effects young children’s physical physique and behavioral development if it is used more than specific hours. First, it is said that using computers for long hours per day has significantly negative effect on young kids’ physical posture. For example, sitting in an in-improper position on a chair simply affects the spine of children especially in early years of growing. In addition to physical posture, staring at the monitor for hours dangerously influenced affects their eyesight health. Another reason that I subscribe to this view is its adversarial consequence that it can have on cognitive development of young children. Many researches have proved that spending hours on computers and electronic devices on in early years of a child’s growth drastically effected affects their cognitive development, which may cause other drawbacks in their future learning steps. At the same time, computer application on in today’s life is essential and not knowing how to apply a computer and its referred respective programs obviously can influence educational developments.As a result, I agree that using computers by young children limitlessly has drastically negative effect on their physical and behavioral growth.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/Computer Use, Parinaz Kajabadi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">- Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on young children. - Do you agree or disagree? I tend to agree that using computers every day negatively effected effects young children’s physical physique and behavioral development if it is used more than specific hours. First, it is said that using computers for long hours per day has significantly negative effect on young kids’ physical posture. For example, sitting in an in-improper position on a chair simply affects the spine of children especially in early years of growing. In addition to physical posture, staring at the monitor for hours dangerously influenced affects their eyesight health. Another reason that I subscribe to this view is its adversarial consequence that it can have on cognitive development of young children. Many researches have proved that spending hours on computers and electronic devices on in early years of a child’s growth drastically effected affects their cognitive development, which may cause other drawbacks in their future learning steps. At the same time, computer application on in today’s life is essential and not knowing how to apply a computer and its referred respective programs obviously can influence educational developments.As a result, I agree that using computers by young children limitlessly has drastically negative effect on their physical and behavioral growth.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Eating no Meat or Fish, Paneez Saebi 2018-10-17T07:42:07+00:00 2018-10-17T07:42:07+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/350-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-07-20/2399-eating-no-meat-or-fish-paneez-saebi <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/Eating no Meat or Fish, Paneez Saebi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole. Discuss the view and give your opinion? These days the number of vegetarians and vegans be has increased in a community that may depends on some factors, same as traditions of the country, religion of the country or some other factors. Some people decide to eat not animal products and some of them do not use animal products tooeither. Both viewpoints will be discussed in this essay, but personally, I totally disagree with this view point. Some people become vegetarians because they believe that this will be benefit for their health that if they eat vegetables, fruits, whole grains and eat not no meat or other animal’s products. Some of them want to have a better body shape of body or they need to lose weight. another one believes that meat or fish has negative impacts on the environments for example eating fishes makes the sea ecosystem become imbalanced such that some kinds of fishes become extinct and also they believe that meat contains fat that causes make some diseases for the human’s body same such as heart attack. On the other hand, meat is one of the most important sources of protein. although protein could be obtained from different sources, but we cannot remove the original source of protein from our diet. Protein helps us to be strong and is very important to the growth of children. Personally I think that being a vegetarians or vegan is not a good idea for everybody bodies And maybe it is useful for some people who have some dieses diseases and they suffer from cholesterol. So other people should eat different kinds of food.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/Eating no Meat or Fish, Paneez Saebi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole. Discuss the view and give your opinion? These days the number of vegetarians and vegans be has increased in a community that may depends on some factors, same as traditions of the country, religion of the country or some other factors. Some people decide to eat not animal products and some of them do not use animal products tooeither. Both viewpoints will be discussed in this essay, but personally, I totally disagree with this view point. Some people become vegetarians because they believe that this will be benefit for their health that if they eat vegetables, fruits, whole grains and eat not no meat or other animal’s products. Some of them want to have a better body shape of body or they need to lose weight. another one believes that meat or fish has negative impacts on the environments for example eating fishes makes the sea ecosystem become imbalanced such that some kinds of fishes become extinct and also they believe that meat contains fat that causes make some diseases for the human’s body same such as heart attack. On the other hand, meat is one of the most important sources of protein. although protein could be obtained from different sources, but we cannot remove the original source of protein from our diet. Protein helps us to be strong and is very important to the growth of children. Personally I think that being a vegetarians or vegan is not a good idea for everybody bodies And maybe it is useful for some people who have some dieses diseases and they suffer from cholesterol. So other people should eat different kinds of food.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Education Mandatory Subjects, Shahroq 2018-10-17T07:41:56+00:00 2018-10-17T07:41:56+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/350-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-07-20/2398-education-mandatory-subjects-shahroq <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/Education Mandatory Subjects, Shahroq.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many students have to study subjects which they do not like. Some people think this is a complete waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? It is true that studying certain subjects, whether students like it or not, has been a compulsory part of many education systems, and it seems to me it cannot be considered entirely useless. Firstly, most of the core subjects are often considered essential for children to survive in today’s day and age. This school curriculum, which has been designed by pedagogical pioneers in recent decades, is mostly predicated on the next generations’ needs and basic requirements for the jobs of tomorrow. While still attending the educational settings, a student needs to get a hold of core lessons such as math, science, and linguistics, to name just a few. Short of being equipped with these subjects whether they are of the interest of his or not, not only would they be less likely to navigate a successful life in society, but also they would be more likely to face far more arduous issues to wrestle with in the years to come. Secondly, many a student is not mature enough to hold a strong opinion about their likes or dislikes. Being in brain development stage, pupils need to try a wide variety of subjects, most of which might be unpalatable, before aiming to pursue a specific path in either a university major or a future job. By trying those unpleasant courses, students would gain well thought off insight to majors which may not be suitable for them, and as a result, they can save a lot of otherwise wasted time in a long run. A student, moreover, would be more conscious of the value of being industrious. Obliged to assimilate the presumably unsatisfactory subjects in school, they would turn out more rounded as a person, for they would find out about their infinite potentials to overcome any obstacle that life throws at them. In conclusion, I am holding on to the view that the process of learning every subject will be of some benefits to students, and it, if devised correctly, will help them to get a fair chance to prosper. shahroq</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/Education Mandatory Subjects, Shahroq.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Many students have to study subjects which they do not like. Some people think this is a complete waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? It is true that studying certain subjects, whether students like it or not, has been a compulsory part of many education systems, and it seems to me it cannot be considered entirely useless. Firstly, most of the core subjects are often considered essential for children to survive in today’s day and age. This school curriculum, which has been designed by pedagogical pioneers in recent decades, is mostly predicated on the next generations’ needs and basic requirements for the jobs of tomorrow. While still attending the educational settings, a student needs to get a hold of core lessons such as math, science, and linguistics, to name just a few. Short of being equipped with these subjects whether they are of the interest of his or not, not only would they be less likely to navigate a successful life in society, but also they would be more likely to face far more arduous issues to wrestle with in the years to come. Secondly, many a student is not mature enough to hold a strong opinion about their likes or dislikes. Being in brain development stage, pupils need to try a wide variety of subjects, most of which might be unpalatable, before aiming to pursue a specific path in either a university major or a future job. By trying those unpleasant courses, students would gain well thought off insight to majors which may not be suitable for them, and as a result, they can save a lot of otherwise wasted time in a long run. A student, moreover, would be more conscious of the value of being industrious. Obliged to assimilate the presumably unsatisfactory subjects in school, they would turn out more rounded as a person, for they would find out about their infinite potentials to overcome any obstacle that life throws at them. In conclusion, I am holding on to the view that the process of learning every subject will be of some benefits to students, and it, if devised correctly, will help them to get a fair chance to prosper. shahroq</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Global Warming, Ali Saeedinia 2018-10-17T07:41:43+00:00 2018-10-17T07:41:43+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/350-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-07-20/2397-global-warming-ali-saeedinia <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/Global Warming, Ali Saeedinia.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today. What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue? There is an uncomfortable reality that greenhouse gases e.g. carbon dioxide contributes to global warming .There have been numerous scientific studies that indicate the planet earth is getting warmer in recent decades. To begin with, there are various reasons that can lead to global warming. Emission of industrial pollutants has a damaging impact on the global temperature and will cause it to rise dramatically. Moreover, Deforestation is playing a vital role in heating up the planet simply because the forests store a large amount of CO2; consequently, cutting down trees will cause a lot of emissions to stay in the atmosphere. The government is able to solve or at least slow down the process of increasing the earth’s temperature by promoting initiatives to heighten people’s awareness of this issue. Furthermore, global warming can be reduced through the imposing and reinforcing tougher laws to reduce air pollution, facilitate environmentally sustainable developments, curbing greenhouse gas emissions and encouraging green space development programs. Like governments, people can also contribute substantially to resolving this phenomenon. Using environmentally friendly vehicles like hybrid cars—which use electricity alongside gasoline—is one of the ways of going green. People can carpool to work in order to decrease the fossil fuel consumption. Individuals need to make some small simple changes in their lifestyle like using reusable water bottles, starting a compost bin, using rain barrels and energy-saving light bulbs are a few to mention in order to help this issue. Although global warming has potentially catastrophic consequences, both the government and individuals must take drastic measures to address this important issue. Not only the authority, but also citizens should take an active role in preserving the planet and help each other to attain this goal.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/Global Warming, Ali Saeedinia.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today. What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue? There is an uncomfortable reality that greenhouse gases e.g. carbon dioxide contributes to global warming .There have been numerous scientific studies that indicate the planet earth is getting warmer in recent decades. To begin with, there are various reasons that can lead to global warming. Emission of industrial pollutants has a damaging impact on the global temperature and will cause it to rise dramatically. Moreover, Deforestation is playing a vital role in heating up the planet simply because the forests store a large amount of CO2; consequently, cutting down trees will cause a lot of emissions to stay in the atmosphere. The government is able to solve or at least slow down the process of increasing the earth’s temperature by promoting initiatives to heighten people’s awareness of this issue. Furthermore, global warming can be reduced through the imposing and reinforcing tougher laws to reduce air pollution, facilitate environmentally sustainable developments, curbing greenhouse gas emissions and encouraging green space development programs. Like governments, people can also contribute substantially to resolving this phenomenon. Using environmentally friendly vehicles like hybrid cars—which use electricity alongside gasoline—is one of the ways of going green. People can carpool to work in order to decrease the fossil fuel consumption. Individuals need to make some small simple changes in their lifestyle like using reusable water bottles, starting a compost bin, using rain barrels and energy-saving light bulbs are a few to mention in order to help this issue. Although global warming has potentially catastrophic consequences, both the government and individuals must take drastic measures to address this important issue. Not only the authority, but also citizens should take an active role in preserving the planet and help each other to attain this goal.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Government and Science, Maryam 2018-10-17T07:41:31+00:00 2018-10-17T07:41:31+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/350-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-07-20/2396-government-and-science-maryam <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/Government and Science, Maryam.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">The government should allocate more funding to teach science rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree? This essay agrees that the scientific teaching has a critical effect on governments’ development and the teaching sciences financially should be more considered rather the other subjects. As a matter of fact, without proper education, professions can’t growth and consequently the opportunities for developing countries will lose. The countries which focus on educational system and spend more money and effort on the knowledge of teaching in various fields would get better result and grow faster. For Instance, Japan as a country with many advances in technology had faced various difficulties such as war and destructions. But its government always has emphasized on investment in teaching science researches to improve industries. On the other hand, there is an opinion that a scientific educational system would guarantee preserving the human and financial resources. This illustrates that the inappropriate educational system not only waist the resources but also postpone the countries growing. In this regards, educational systems in some developing countries, has dramatically changed and they have found that spending money on improving educational system is inevitable. In conclusion, for having more advances in fields like technology, and industries, every government should found on teaching. Conversely, neglecting the importance of changing teaching strategies in a scientific way would hold back the countries in their improvement.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/Government and Science, Maryam.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">The government should allocate more funding to teach science rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree? This essay agrees that the scientific teaching has a critical effect on governments’ development and the teaching sciences financially should be more considered rather the other subjects. As a matter of fact, without proper education, professions can’t growth and consequently the opportunities for developing countries will lose. The countries which focus on educational system and spend more money and effort on the knowledge of teaching in various fields would get better result and grow faster. For Instance, Japan as a country with many advances in technology had faced various difficulties such as war and destructions. But its government always has emphasized on investment in teaching science researches to improve industries. On the other hand, there is an opinion that a scientific educational system would guarantee preserving the human and financial resources. This illustrates that the inappropriate educational system not only waist the resources but also postpone the countries growing. In this regards, educational systems in some developing countries, has dramatically changed and they have found that spending money on improving educational system is inevitable. In conclusion, for having more advances in fields like technology, and industries, every government should found on teaching. Conversely, neglecting the importance of changing teaching strategies in a scientific way would hold back the countries in their improvement.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Immunise Children, Dharmender 2018-10-17T07:41:19+00:00 2018-10-17T07:41:19+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/350-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-07-20/2395-immunise-children-dharmender <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/Immunise Children, Dharmender.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Should parents be obliged to immunize their children against common diseases? Or do individuals have the right to choose not to immunize children? Why is your view in this practice? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from own knowledge or experience? Some people argue that the state governments does do not have the rights to imposing impose immunization to on parents for their children. However, I would suggest that this practice would adhere protect children not be infected by harmful diseases. In this essay, I would present the right side of this practice with appropriate examples. Preventative medicine have has proved to be the most effective way of reduce reducing the fatal childhood diseases. This has benefited overall. Immunization is quite common to for children in these days,. it is practiced mainly in cities and reaching to the countryside by the governments after they impose it must be practiced. The governments have taken many steps to support these practices and hence results are visible at on a large scale. The diseases such as polio has have been completely removed from countries like India and many others. Serious diseases such as polio, smallpox, influenza and tuberculosis come under the national immunization program. As a consequence of this program the children are immunized and remain disease-free and benefit society overall. Parents should follow the instructions for this program to support their nation. Water prone borne diseases, poor hygiene can cause many problems for to children whose immunity immune system has not developed yet and clean water is limited. So by providing the proper vaccination on time would reduce the chances of infections. In summary, I would say this practice have has several benefits and provides assistance to society. If parents think not to follow these programs, it would lead to many consequences to for their children. I believe nobody should suggest to reverse reversing this process.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/Immunise Children, Dharmender.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Should parents be obliged to immunize their children against common diseases? Or do individuals have the right to choose not to immunize children? Why is your view in this practice? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from own knowledge or experience? Some people argue that the state governments does do not have the rights to imposing impose immunization to on parents for their children. However, I would suggest that this practice would adhere protect children not be infected by harmful diseases. In this essay, I would present the right side of this practice with appropriate examples. Preventative medicine have has proved to be the most effective way of reduce reducing the fatal childhood diseases. This has benefited overall. Immunization is quite common to for children in these days,. it is practiced mainly in cities and reaching to the countryside by the governments after they impose it must be practiced. The governments have taken many steps to support these practices and hence results are visible at on a large scale. The diseases such as polio has have been completely removed from countries like India and many others. Serious diseases such as polio, smallpox, influenza and tuberculosis come under the national immunization program. As a consequence of this program the children are immunized and remain disease-free and benefit society overall. Parents should follow the instructions for this program to support their nation. Water prone borne diseases, poor hygiene can cause many problems for to children whose immunity immune system has not developed yet and clean water is limited. So by providing the proper vaccination on time would reduce the chances of infections. In summary, I would say this practice have has several benefits and provides assistance to society. If parents think not to follow these programs, it would lead to many consequences to for their children. I believe nobody should suggest to reverse reversing this process.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Longevity, Mostafa Torabi 2018-10-17T07:41:05+00:00 2018-10-17T07:41:05+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/350-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-07-20/2394-longevity-mostafa-torabi <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/Longevity, Mostafa Torabi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Written by M.Torabi One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? One of the eternal dreams of humankind, which has been depicted in legends, is longevity. Thanks to recent advancements in medicine, this ambition is closer to the truth. The pursuit of living longer has many potential effects on human society which can be beneficial in some ways and detrimental in others. In the other words, not only does failure to take appropriate measures in line with longer life not only does it eliminate the positive outcomes of these advancements, but it also can even threaten the human life on the earth. The more population needs the more expenditure. While governments have to pay more for the care or other needs of the elderly, they often do not play a full-blown role in the prosperity of the economy. Moreover, depleting the natural resources is another important implication of prolonging the life which indicates the necessity of adopting a suitable policy. Another disadvantage of longevity is related to caring for the elderly. The fact is that in most cases today’s medical knowledge can only keep people alive, not wellbeing. For instance, Dementia is one of the diseases that there is currently no definitive treatment for it. Such illnesses may deprive pleasure from people in a long life and maybe beingmay be a burden is more difficult than death for them. Far from being devoid of advantages, people who have a long life can benefit from the beauty of life. For example the joy of being with friends as well as family or even seeing grandchildren. That’s why wishing long life for dear ones is a permanent prayer in all cultures. In addition, longer life gives people and especially scientists and specialists a chance to serve more time in society. To sum up, I think the advantages of living longer outweigh the disadvantages. This is provided people have appropriate wellbeing conditions and play their role in society. Nobody likes the end of life but for having the best of it, reasonable policies and planning should be applied.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/Longevity, Mostafa Torabi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Written by M.Torabi One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? One of the eternal dreams of humankind, which has been depicted in legends, is longevity. Thanks to recent advancements in medicine, this ambition is closer to the truth. The pursuit of living longer has many potential effects on human society which can be beneficial in some ways and detrimental in others. In the other words, not only does failure to take appropriate measures in line with longer life not only does it eliminate the positive outcomes of these advancements, but it also can even threaten the human life on the earth. The more population needs the more expenditure. While governments have to pay more for the care or other needs of the elderly, they often do not play a full-blown role in the prosperity of the economy. Moreover, depleting the natural resources is another important implication of prolonging the life which indicates the necessity of adopting a suitable policy. Another disadvantage of longevity is related to caring for the elderly. The fact is that in most cases today’s medical knowledge can only keep people alive, not wellbeing. For instance, Dementia is one of the diseases that there is currently no definitive treatment for it. Such illnesses may deprive pleasure from people in a long life and maybe beingmay be a burden is more difficult than death for them. Far from being devoid of advantages, people who have a long life can benefit from the beauty of life. For example the joy of being with friends as well as family or even seeing grandchildren. That’s why wishing long life for dear ones is a permanent prayer in all cultures. In addition, longer life gives people and especially scientists and specialists a chance to serve more time in society. To sum up, I think the advantages of living longer outweigh the disadvantages. This is provided people have appropriate wellbeing conditions and play their role in society. Nobody likes the end of life but for having the best of it, reasonable policies and planning should be applied.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Old Buildings, Amir Adel 2018-10-17T07:40:53+00:00 2018-10-17T07:40:53+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/350-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-07-20/2393-old-buildings-amir-adel <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/Old Buildings, Amir Adel.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience. These days urban construction is one of the critical parts of city management. Some prefer to rebuild new ones instead of maintaining of old buildings and streets and their main reason for this decision usually is cost and time. However, it would seem that there are many other factors in city management that tell us to keep our urban heritages and overhaul them. Primarily, each city around the world is remembered by its design and looks of streets, neighbourhoods as well as special elements. However, if a government or local council planes to knock down and rebuild them, they gradually would destroy backgrounds and collective memory of the past and current citizens. This trend leads to loss of people’s attachment to their city and they also convert to people who help to more distraction on the city. For instance, if Paris’s streets had been demolished and rebuilt, today there were not any narrow famous streets in there where most Parisians and tourists love to walk and getting lost in. Second, for restoration and renovation of a building, we generally require fewer resources and lower energy that will be better for environment. While it seems that new buildings are more efficient especially in terms of thermal control, the cost of new building construction is so high that is not worth trying and by madding some precise modifications, we can gain our points in efficient energy usage. One of the best example of old cities that has had successful experience in improving efficient energy use in homes is Copenhagen where by using modern means not only has this city decreased home energy usage, but also keep kept all their old and historical buildings. In conclusion, although there are some benefits from making new roads and house like lower cost or time, if city governors just concentrate on cost and time, our cities will change to some boring and soulless places where no generations can have emotion relation with it.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/Old Buildings, Amir Adel.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience. These days urban construction is one of the critical parts of city management. Some prefer to rebuild new ones instead of maintaining of old buildings and streets and their main reason for this decision usually is cost and time. However, it would seem that there are many other factors in city management that tell us to keep our urban heritages and overhaul them. Primarily, each city around the world is remembered by its design and looks of streets, neighbourhoods as well as special elements. However, if a government or local council planes to knock down and rebuild them, they gradually would destroy backgrounds and collective memory of the past and current citizens. This trend leads to loss of people’s attachment to their city and they also convert to people who help to more distraction on the city. For instance, if Paris’s streets had been demolished and rebuilt, today there were not any narrow famous streets in there where most Parisians and tourists love to walk and getting lost in. Second, for restoration and renovation of a building, we generally require fewer resources and lower energy that will be better for environment. While it seems that new buildings are more efficient especially in terms of thermal control, the cost of new building construction is so high that is not worth trying and by madding some precise modifications, we can gain our points in efficient energy usage. One of the best example of old cities that has had successful experience in improving efficient energy use in homes is Copenhagen where by using modern means not only has this city decreased home energy usage, but also keep kept all their old and historical buildings. In conclusion, although there are some benefits from making new roads and house like lower cost or time, if city governors just concentrate on cost and time, our cities will change to some boring and soulless places where no generations can have emotion relation with it.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> The language, Ali Fazlali 2018-10-17T07:40:40+00:00 2018-10-17T07:40:40+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/350-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-07-20/2392-the-language-ali-fazlali <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/The language, Ali Fazlali.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Every year several languages die out. Some people say it is not important because if we speak fewer languages life would be easier. N owadays, developing of technology leads to being closer to each other. Most of people know at least one language more than their mother tongue these days. In recent years, several languages disappeared because of many reasons. Many believe we should develop the new languages. Reversely, some individuals opine we should just know one or two languages. Some people argue if some excessive languages diminish, the life will be better. In other words, they argue the less we know language, the easier we live. Some of them agree to maintain the basic languages which are spoken commonly in the world such as: English, French and Chinese. The other languages should be just spoken in their local area. In addition, some extremists asseverate English as the international language should just be reserved and the other languages should join to the History book. On the other hand, some individuals believe that language is the basic way to communicate. Not only should not we eliminate the languages but also we should add some new languages to the school courses. Some of these languages are developing especially in the social networks. Language illustrates the culture and history of the people of the region which is spoken. Schools should be more active in teaching languages with some new methods. The more languages children know, the better they can communicate with different people. In conclusion, I personally opine we should reserve the existing languages in order to get familiar with various cultures which canbe included several benefits. Moreover, the linguists should pay attention to the both vanishing and distortion of languages all over the world.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/The language, Ali Fazlali.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Every year several languages die out. Some people say it is not important because if we speak fewer languages life would be easier. N owadays, developing of technology leads to being closer to each other. Most of people know at least one language more than their mother tongue these days. In recent years, several languages disappeared because of many reasons. Many believe we should develop the new languages. Reversely, some individuals opine we should just know one or two languages. Some people argue if some excessive languages diminish, the life will be better. In other words, they argue the less we know language, the easier we live. Some of them agree to maintain the basic languages which are spoken commonly in the world such as: English, French and Chinese. The other languages should be just spoken in their local area. In addition, some extremists asseverate English as the international language should just be reserved and the other languages should join to the History book. On the other hand, some individuals believe that language is the basic way to communicate. Not only should not we eliminate the languages but also we should add some new languages to the school courses. Some of these languages are developing especially in the social networks. Language illustrates the culture and history of the people of the region which is spoken. Schools should be more active in teaching languages with some new methods. The more languages children know, the better they can communicate with different people. In conclusion, I personally opine we should reserve the existing languages in order to get familiar with various cultures which canbe included several benefits. Moreover, the linguists should pay attention to the both vanishing and distortion of languages all over the world.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> The Olympic Games, Boshra 2018-10-17T07:40:23+00:00 2018-10-17T07:40:23+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/350-fridays-writing-workshop-1397/writing-workshop-friday-97-07-20/2391-the-olympic-games-boshra <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/The Olympic Games, Boshra.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people believe that the Olympics Games do not have a role in the 21st century. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience. The Olympic Games could have several undeniably effective roles in peoples’ life. It has sparked a heated debate among researchers some of whom assume that in the current century it is not of the great importance and is just a way of wasting time and money. Some others, however, assert vice versa. I, personally, wholeheartedly agree with the latter group. This short essay elaborates on this controversial issue. First and foremost, watching these games through media, viewers will be encouraged to put doing regular exercise in their daily programs which is an effective way for having a healthy life style and even it prevents individuals from becoming overweight. Further and even more importantly, participants get familiar with an array of members of the public from all over the world and with diverse cultures. They can take numerous advantages from this relationship. A research, done in south of Canada, reveals that a group of young generations who either like either watching these competitions or attending them are significantly more rounded people as an adults and more successful in their personal life. That is why, not only are the Olympic games not just competitions, but it also place a wide range of benefits on the life of individuals engaged in them. On the other hand, proponents opine that the technological facility like the internet has faded boundaries between countries. In this way, the Olympic Games have not any effective role in the world and it could be just a way of wasting time and money. In addition, nowadays people are leading a hectic life style and do not have enough time for these activities. On the whole, I once again reaffirm my position with regard to the beneficial effects of the Olympic Games on members of the public’s life over this century.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1397/Writing Workshop Friday 97.07.20/The Olympic Games, Boshra.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people believe that the Olympics Games do not have a role in the 21st century. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience. The Olympic Games could have several undeniably effective roles in peoples’ life. It has sparked a heated debate among researchers some of whom assume that in the current century it is not of the great importance and is just a way of wasting time and money. Some others, however, assert vice versa. I, personally, wholeheartedly agree with the latter group. This short essay elaborates on this controversial issue. First and foremost, watching these games through media, viewers will be encouraged to put doing regular exercise in their daily programs which is an effective way for having a healthy life style and even it prevents individuals from becoming overweight. Further and even more importantly, participants get familiar with an array of members of the public from all over the world and with diverse cultures. They can take numerous advantages from this relationship. A research, done in south of Canada, reveals that a group of young generations who either like either watching these competitions or attending them are significantly more rounded people as an adults and more successful in their personal life. That is why, not only are the Olympic games not just competitions, but it also place a wide range of benefits on the life of individuals engaged in them. On the other hand, proponents opine that the technological facility like the internet has faded boundaries between countries. In this way, the Olympic Games have not any effective role in the world and it could be just a way of wasting time and money. In addition, nowadays people are leading a hectic life style and do not have enough time for these activities. On the whole, I once again reaffirm my position with regard to the beneficial effects of the Olympic Games on members of the public’s life over this century.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>