جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that the buildings such as flats should be designed to last a long time. Others believe that it is more important to provide accommodation quickly and cheaply. Accommodation is a vital issue that makes the human’s world goes around. There is a range of different views on the question as to whether constructions which are sustainable and built in the a long run are more preferable than that at a rapid rate with a relatively cheaper price. Although a home, whether an apartment or a house, with at a much more affordable price which is built in a short-run sounds appealing, it is the choice with a feasible safety and low-price guarantee. It is better to start starting off with a more logical point of view. What I mean is to make a building more appropriate for so many years ahead to stay in. As I mentioned in the former paragraph, accommodation plays a crucial role in every individual’s life, so the quality and design of architecture is as significant as water and air. Moreover, safety and the sense of feeling secured within your place is a remarkable factor which stems from high quality planning of construction. That is to say, not only is a top quality structure important for our physical health to feel immune within, but also it is important to feel your home as is a safe place, psychologically speaking. To illustrate more, there are cities and villages where which were ruined in consequence of an earthquake; had their buildings been erected far more sustainablesustainably, thousands of people would not have died. On the other hand, low salaries and lots of difficulties make people vote for the opposite view. They assert that the instant process of buildings and affordable prices are all what that they need. Their perspective, however, is entirely understandable, but the result is nothing but a temporary satisfaction. By poor scrutiny along the process of constructing that leads to completinge the place far sooner, you take your life atin a risk by living in such homes. By way of conclusion, there is no doubt that the two points of views have their specific pros and cons, but I firmly maintain that it is better to wait a bit more and carry more efforts to purchase a comfortable home which is guaranteed for a lifelong. At last, it is worth mentioning the belief of English people who say, “ I am not that wealthy to purchase a cheaper one _object_ ./ "I am not rich enough to buy cheap things"

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why Is the case? what can be done about this problem? Despite the fact that human beingmankind has attained numerous remarkable achievements in doing new models of planting and producing genetically modified crops, huge numbers of individuals in diverse places suffer from lack of enough edible items. This essay will discuss the causes and some possible solutions. The most important issue is associated with overpopulation. the rising the number of people causes some relatively insurmountable challenges such as the decreasing increasing the sea levels, air and water pollution. Another significant reason is urbanization. It means that people working in gardens and agricultural fields tend to become an urbanites and take advantages of from the city’s facilities. That is why they destroy the planted grounds near established living areas and build some skyscrapers and shopping centers. The duty of tackling the aforementioned difficulty is directly incumbent upon the government. Through establishing a partnership among different nations, they can introduce some appropriate ways of facing this problem. Not only should they allocate certain sums of money to this area of concern, but also they had better consider it a priority in society. What is more, preventing from overgrazing, desertification and destroying forests, the authorities can halt the deterioration of this issue. Last but not least, teaching taught by producing documentaries and some movies about humankinds’ humankind’s detrimental effects on the environment, members of the public will be aware of the implications of lacking enough food. By way of conclusion, that food insecurity poses numerous unsolvable problems is an undeniable given. The notable cause could be the rise in the number of people. In addition, for resolving this issue the most effective way is raising individuals’ awareness.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Sanaz Namdar Topic: Some people think that building such as flats and houses should be designed to last a long time. Others believe that it is more important to provide accommodation quickly and cheaply. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Previously, constructing prodigious multi-storey residential structures sounded far-fetched Whilst by using scientific modern methods innovated by scientists pushing back the frontiers of knowledge these types of structures have become a common sight. Although there are some various views as to whether boosting houses having high durability are recommended or fast and cheap methods for constructing are preferable, I personally believe that it is plausible to build houses or flats with high quality however despitethey have extremely tight budgets regarding the delivery time. From one prospective, dwellings with strong structures conforming to up-todate building codes including structural and architectural ones is appealing for several reasons. It is a given that in many cultures houses show their owners’ prestige and social level ;therefore, people preferably choose their own architectures in order to try to build their dream houses. Despite althoughthat people should allocate a sufficient immense budget at first to building up the quality house, this expenditure is for good, so from a futuristic prospect it has economic justifications. Moreover, when their future generation come into their wealthy inheritance having deeply attached to their parents, it seems their parents’ attempts finally bear fruit. From another prospective, according to the technological development in terms of structural methods, we have witnessed some major transformations in the building industry leading to high-speed construction in spite of considering safety rules and shrinking budget policy judiciously. For example, the a skyscraper was recently built in china in less than 2 months with more than 50 floors and purely based on authentic building codes, not least the earthquake code. For thishigh-rise building, the engineers succeeded in keeping the budget down in comparison with their normal constructed counterparts. Furthermore, based on the ever-expanding urban population problem causing housing boom in some major cities, which is not insurmountable provided that governments or some non-profit organizations should financially advocate all citizens especially the underprivileged, by some special plans such as social housing, the economic project, to solve this problem by using the latest rapid construction methods as well as observing the safety standards. Beyond a shadow of doubt, according to the above-mentioned factors, I hold the notion that in this day and age technological advances in all aspects assist us to in developing accommodation for ourselves far faster, safer, stronger, and more economic simultaneously.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that buildings such as flats and houses should be designed to last a long time. Others believe that is more important to provide accommodation quickly and cheaply. Discuss both views and give your opinion. There are two different opinions about the strength and resistance of buildings in public belief. The First group considers the strength and resistance of a building in order to be reliable for facing natural disasters such as earthquakes, storm, and tornados and so forth. The latter believes that, buildings which have accommodation and visual beauty, provided that they are prepareding cheaply and quickly constructions is are in priority. My philosophy in life is in line with the former better late than never! As long as I’veas far as I am concerned, in Tehran for example, because of an ethe special geographical location, we should consider resistance of a building and using facilities for saving energy as our prime concern, so, if we build constructions due to this idea, we would provide the society with safety. Such edifices may have more longevity even though building them costs more. Unfortunately in my city the most critical factor for constructors is using cheap materials to increase their own profits. As a result, nowadays, the majority of builders do not provide suitable isolators insulation or resistance resistant materials in buildings. However, new structures with modern designs even with cheap qualities are more popular which is not only suitable for builders’ profits but also people are concerned more about the beauty and luxury points and do not pay attention about the other important items. We have new buildings with various styles for different tastes but not all of them are built with essential standards which leads the appearance of our city to an unpleasant situation. In conclusion, in constructing many different items should be considered. Resistance and long lastingdurability areis very important, besides it is comforting to see some builders consider nice decent design and convenience convenient environment in their works as well as the mentioned factors.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Ali Saeedinia_W04_E 8/03/2018 Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Since the time of evolution of human beings, people have faced the inescapable impacts of changing lifestyles. Although many people prefer to do the similar things and avoid challenges in life, I would argue that there are some positive aspects to making alterations to our daily activities. To commence/begin with, some people long for a life that is simple and planned. They choose a life in which they do the same work over and over again and prefer to remain in their comfort zone. Moreover, when people age, they may become fairly conservative and do not dare to face any risk of changes anymore. Furthermore, senior citizens really find it difficult to keep pace with new technological advancements and prefer to stick with their tested methods. In addition, there are people that really enjoy what they do and are passionate about it. It is a strong reason for not changing when you are enthusiastic about work you do. On the flip side, others, especially the younger generation is eager to seek new opportunities and change their lives because they would take bold decisions. In spite of although doing the same activity repetitively could be an easy task, in the modern world, people should sharpen/hone their skills as well as a variety of experiences of different sorts rather than repeating the same job in the same fashion. For instance, a survey has proven that people with multi-experience jobs can adapt in other organizations more easily. Moreover, individuals easily get bored with their monotonous life, consequently they always look for new changes to keep their lives exciting, such people take life as it comes and live every single day enjoying themselves. To put it in a nutshell, I would say that human beings definitely need some kinds of changes in life, simply because it is stimulating and promising for individuals. With this mindset we would be able to experience new places and situations that we couldn’t even imagine in our wildest dreams.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people say that parents should encourage their children to take part in organized group activities in their free time. Others say that it is important for children to learn how to occupy themselves on their own. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Many argue that children had better participate in predesigned activities in a team during their spare time, . others, however, reason that it is more beneficial if children learn how to manage their free time by on their own. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, I personally, believe group activities inherently have more advantages than personal ones. Advocates of planned team works hold the idea that children can learn a lot if being involved in a group activity. They can find new friends, and improve their social skills in such groups. That certain group activities can significantly improveing social skills of children is an undeniable fact. Furthermore, in most cases team works isare designed in a way that benefits the society. Collecting garbage from nature, paying a visit to senior citizens and supporting other children with special needs are cases in point that specialists claim that not only do this activities benefit the society, but also improve children in a variety of aspects. On the other hand, people who are not agree with organized activities in a group, reason that not only do may those activities may damage part of children’s character, but also may endanger they their life if the organizers fail to take care of them carefully. If children learn how to spend their spare time in an appropriate way during their childhood, they can manage their time in their future life. Time management is plays a crucially important role in our life, and it is one of the skills people can development since from early ages. Only if children succeeded into occupying the time, can their parents expect them to stand on their own feet as an independently successful person. To sum up, though I do not prefer the group activities I cannot deny the merits of them. Although Happy and energetic now, children who take part in such organized activities may suffer from critical mismanagement in their adulthood. From my point of view, parents would rather let their children decide on their spare time by themselves.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays, social causes of increase in marriage age and delay in bringing a child had led to an age gap between parents and children. This issue makes a challenging debate among the fans of tradition and modernity. Although, the great difference in parents and children age may have some benefits, I believe it should not exceed 30 years. Undoubtedly, children who have been born in a family with older parents could be satisfied with their wealthier and more comfortable lives because their parents had sufficient time to earn money. In addition, most of these parents have achieved success in their children in career and education which can affect their children’s training and inspiration toward life. The parents’ social situation can inspire their children in order to build their own successful future without feeling any financial shortage. They could achieve their goals and whatever they want more easily. But the mentioned materialistic achievement is not sufficient as children have more significant emotional desires in their life that is often faded in families with older parents. In this case children not only live alone their childhood, but also should take care of their parents as they grow up. On the other hand, having young parents can bring more energy and pleasure to the children’s lives. The lower difference in age of parents with the children causes more patience in parents’ behavior due to not being separated thoroughly of their childhood and not being involved in the troubles. For instance, young parents would forgive their children’s mistakes easier and encourage them for their tiny successes. Moreover, physical abilities of young parents assist them to play with children and to take them to parks and etc. In general, I think that children with lower age difference with their parents could experience a happier life compared to those of older parents and this happiness is the need of each child rather than money.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share the same fashions, advertising, brands, eating habits and TV channels. Do the disadvantages of this trend outweigh the advantages? It is true that we have been facing a growing similarity between countries, for people are following almost similar fashion, advertising, brands, ways of eating, and watching the same programmes on TV. It seems to me that these trends have been more detrimental comparing to their benefits. Firstly, the less dominant cultures would gradually die out. Exposed to the same products and media, not only would people be encouraged to either purchase or consume the same consumer goods, but also they would forget about their own precious culture. Consequently, parents and senior members of society would not be able to hand down their traditional values and inheritance to their children as the next generation, which means in a few generations to come, people of these countries would not possess any of their heritage. The whole process would negatively affect these people’s livelihood in numerous ways. The Tourism industry as a major source of income for many people, for instance, would hugely suffer because tourists would not bother traveling to these countries, which are already depleted of their most exotic features, such as their apparels and cuisines. Furthermore, it would create an unbridgeable financial gap between people of different countries. While using internationally popular products designed and manufactured mostly by powerful nations, people are less likely to consume goods come coming from poor countries with fewer resources. As a result, we would witness more profit and job opportunities in the wealthy countries, and at the same time fewer vacancies and wealth in poorer nations. Moreover, as the demand for similar products is increasing, manufacturers will be able to offer their products with so competitive a price, which pushes many small industries with traditional production lines out of business, hence again less job prospect for people in impoverished countries. In brief, I argue that we should actively promote global diversity, as in the most cases the drawbacks of these similarities are significantly heavier than their blessings.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that buildings such as flats and houses should be designed to last a long time. Others believe that it is more important to provide accommodation quickly and cheaply. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. H ousing is a primary demand for humans. Caves were as first homes for mankind. mankindHuman tried to build a house for his family with timbers. A house is a safe place to live in. Nowadays, the population is growing rapidly and they it requires a home. They should settle in flats and houses. Designing constructions is a basic stage in the building industry. It should be perfect in any aspect such as: interior and exterior decoration, architectural design and civil design. This designing can supply a comfortable place for a person who was is busy during the day and wants/wishes to rest in a calm place. Designers should consider financial conditions because there is a limited budget but frugality must not affect on safety in case of an earthquake. Designing should last neither slowly nor does fast. Timing has an optimum measure to take place. If it lasts fast, maybe, some conditions will be forgotten/neglected by designers. On the other hand, if it lasts too long some problems will happen like homelessness. It means that some people pay money for their house but their accommodation is not ready and they suffer from homelessness. They must rent an apartment or settle in an unwanted house temporarily. In conclusion, a talented designer is one who calculates the dimensions with by considering time and money and this is themanagement. This management can be profitable not only for designers but also for engineers. Time and money are two important factors for designers which leads to a client’s satisfaction, so designers should notice heed that.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Building a long lasting house or providing a temporary accommodation, which one is in priority? What the answer would be, definitely, deals with the needs and the uses, in other words, the purpose why the house is built comes into consideration. Generally speaking, it would be more convincing to build houses which are guaranteed to be used a long time, on the contrary, there might be a sort of conditions that a cheaper and less time consuming buildings is are desired. Most people, including me, prefer the best instruction construction referring with regard to its planning and implementing such as the design of the house and the qualified material used. While in construction of applying such houses a large amount of money and time need to be spent, the result would be both convenient and precious due to its strength upon any upcoming natural disasters such as floods or earthquakes. Although the quality of housing has received great credit amongst individuals, when a disaster such as an earthquake occurs and leaves great numbers of people homeless what exactly is urgent could be the people to be settled. In such situations, the length of time on hand is so pressed that the only thing is providing a shelter. No longer is the design and long-lasting criterion considered and the only significant aim would be getting it wrapped up by using prefabricatedrestructured materials to provide a comfortable accommodation for homeless families in a shorter time and at a cheaper price. All in all, based on my point of view, it is relatively true to say that the purpose of housing has widely influenced on the way an instruction structure is built. Only by the time there is some force to build the house temporarily, should the people choose the fast building matter otherwise, the more qualified the houses are, the more assured the people would be.