جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Ali Saeedinia_W03_E Having a balanced diet and eating balanced meals is the key to a healthy life. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Although eating well that includes all types of food that people need is important, there are other factors that have a major effect on a healthy life. Exercising and dealing with stress could well be as important as diet. Furthermore, sticking to a healthy diet is more challenging these days. Having a balanced meal certainly has a beneficial effect on human health and overall well-being. Many disorders are directly associated with bad eating habits. Consuming a balanced diet, consisting of all major nutrition groups, which are proteins, carbohydrates, essential fats, vitamins and minerals can help us to achieve optimal health throughout life. We need vast majority variety of different foods to provide the right amount of nutrition for our body. Moreover, many researches conducted by nutritionists indicate that some health-related conditions are directly related to our diet. However, there is more than just a good diet to a healthy life. Many people suffer from various illnesses even though they are eating healthy food. Moreover, there are other factors which play a major role in healthy life like daily exercise and lack of stress. Doing physical activities can reduce the possibilities of contracting a disease. In addition, recent studies which have been carried out by scientists have demonstrated that the chronic stress does increase the risk of developing health problems, such as high blood pressure, heart disease and diabetes. In conclusion, although being on a balanced diet is important for general health, other elements like regular workout and stress-free lifestyle is are as important.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is positive or negative development? The accessibility of commodities mankind desires is becoming more pervasive, and people of different countries have access to each other’s products easier than before. This essay discusses whether the advantages of this double edged sword outweigh the disadvantages or not. Nowadays, communications, transport facilities and global desires have led to availability of any product throughout the whole world. For instance, Brazilians can purchase what is made in Italy or vice versa. Although this issue assists in having some favorites in common, it would degrade some local products. In other words, exporting some goods to a region may cause reduction in domestic products by decreasing people's interest in the local goods. On the other hand, some of these imported commodities bring the culture of where they are were made and this can even hurt the original culture of people receiving them and make people reluctant to their own culture gradually. That the negative effects would be observed in some cases is inevitable but the positive points should be noticed as well. Despite the mentioned disadvantages, this phenomenon, that is to say the availability of any product anywhere, can grow people's enthusiastismc in each other’s culture, customs and even language. Therefore, the concept of global village can be completed in this way and it assists in achieving a more harmonious universe by these kinds of trades. Besides, the variety of commodity in the market provides a competitive atmosphere among producers of the same commodity, no matter it is an agricultural crop or an electrical devisedevice. In this way, contending for having more costumers' consumers' satisfaction would result in achieving a higher quality products and benefits both the costumer and producer. To sum up, I opine that although some adverse consequences may occur due to global trades among countries with distinct origins, the advantages make it more acceptable. Humans' task is to make the earth replete with integrity and mutual understanding and this action can be the beginning.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Recently, the age differences between parents and their children have turned into a very controversial issue which has been discussed by so many psychologists and family experts as well. Some believe that the less age difference exists, the better generation gap is handled. Since this is not the only criterion dealt with the children training case, hence other factors such as behavioral resistance, sufficient education and financial affordance affordability are significant factors, which take considerable time for parents to achieve, play a significant role in upbringing of well- adjusted children. First of all, behavioral resistance which does not occur but after time, is an important proof of responsible parents. It is crystal clear that the time needed for an individual, reaching to a stable point of behavior is not deniable. Moreover, evidence shows that children have been well-brought up by the parents who showed up with resisted consistent behavior rather than the opposite who are challenged with their own experience of behaving at the time. Secondly, sufficient education in hand is a noticeable element that parents can utilize in order to train their children. Never would there be enough time for very young parents to foster a child and acquire desired knowledge simultaneously. This can lead to serious consequences which might happen as a result/Therefore, the impact of less or non-educated parents as the result of time is not avoidable. The last but not the least, is the financial affordanceaffordability. Regardless of the inherently rich families, young parents need some time to relatively empower their economical bases for a relief comfortable life to be provided after child’s birth. To bring the discussion into haltsum up, although generation gap is not an ignorable insignificant element of training children, whilst other factors have been fulfilled, parents would be able to benefit of from a well training environment for their children.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Topic: Some people think that children should go to kindergarten before attending primary school, while others believe that is better for children to stay all day with their families. Discuss both views and give your own opinion Although nowadays, going to the kindergarten has become more popular all over the world, there are some different prospects about this relatively modern change. Some are for attending nursery school while the opponents are against this. I, personally, believe that it has overwhelminged merits for children going to kindergarten if their parents chose the one which is suitable, otherwise it can have some dire consequences. On the one hand, some insist on the view that not going to nursery school is appealing owing to waves of reasons. Firstly, the experiences of children passing all the time with their families at home show that they become sick less compared to those who are going to kindergarten, and it is obviously conspicuous as viral diseases can be spread out easily in these types of circumstances. Moreover, since children’s immune system is more vulnerable, they are at higher risks of being sick. Furthermore, economy-wise providing costs of these day-care services may impose more pressure on families’ budget especially, in some countries where there is not any subsidy which is allocated to this segment by governments or any non-profit organization. Besides, there is the psychological theory expressing that going to kindergarten before primary school narrow restricts children’s freedom down which is merely available in early ages; that is to say, they have much time to learn expertise and being in society while it is a really scarce situation for humans having to have this absolute tranquility and joy. On the other hand, some advocate the opposing impression that children can reap the significant benefits of going to nursery school, and learning the communication skills in early ages can be the first one. Moreover, it gives the children the opportunity to practice being responsible and independent in addition to being familiar with society very soon. In overall, this is the occasionpreparing children for their adulthood. Secondly, they can vent their enormous energies in the right way direction by playing, singing, and practical activities based on various teaching methods which many parents do not have any awareness about them or even if they know knowing, they do not have any time to implement them. It also makes plausible for employed mothers to come back to work far soon when they are sure that their children are attended to by skilled people. Finally, kindergarten can flourish enhance children’s talents by the specific methods performed implemented according to the latest disciplines recommendeding by skilled psychologists and scholars and they may lead children to be valuable members of society in their future. In conclusion, while there are some different views as to whether going to kindergarten can be beneficial or not, I suppose that the obtained benefits of this attending outweigh the drawbacks.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

The old tradition of a family having a meal together is disappearing. Why do you think is this happening? How does it affect individuals and the community? In the past, all members of a family have had to be present on at the supper table and it was a symbol of a bonded family. However, today it would be odd to see a family having a plan for eating together and except some special occasions like holidays, they eat out or alone. This essay briefly investigates briefly in its reasons and effects on our life. Primarily, we are too busy these days and the pace of life is sadly faster than in the past. Most family members have to work until the late night and not only do not they not gather for lunch but also for dinner. Moreover, heavily relaying on ready services makes us so too lazy and nowadays even in weekends families prefer to order meals from caterers or eat out. Also modern life problems like heavy traffics sap our strength and having no energy to cook in the kitchen and set the dinner table, family members are too exhausted when they come back home, so everyone knows that they should eat something out. Family dinners have many benefits for its memberspeople especially children and whenever we break with itthem, we may lose all of them. Research shows that eating together strengthens family bonds and notably for kids. It will improve the sense of intimacy between parents and children, they learn to talk with each other, and therefore it will likely reduce the rate of addictions and violent behaviour in adolescence. In addition, when we have a regular plan to having have meals together in at home, it probably reduces the numbers of time we eat fast foods and it would affect our health. Lastly, having family meals together can save money. A siample estimate finds that preparing foods and meals in at home for a family is cheaper than eating out individually and gradually results in huge amounts of saving. In conclusion, although it seems that we can put the blame on modern lifestyle in this case, benefits of this old custom are absolutely essential so that we should find a new way to make balance between our outdoor activities and family eating gathering.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people believe that a great difference in age between parents and children is more beneficial. Do you think the advantages of a greater difference in age between them outweigh the disadvantages? There is a range of different opinions around the issue of the ideal age for becoming parents which plays a significant role in terms of age difference between the child and his caregivers. Some advocates the idea of becoming a mother/father in elder older periods of their life in favor of serving a wellequipped condition to the offspring, while others hold the opposite point of view in order to avoid health problems. First and foremost, it is worth mentioning that being a parent in late 30’s of each individual is more likely to offer financial supports; As long as, most of the aged couples are well-educated or shaped in their career, so they are far prone to build a better-prepared life for the child, mundanely speaking. Moreover, the older you grow, the better you identify yourself as an independent character, this that is why older parents seem more patient and take better steps to overcome any difficulties. This is not to say that being an older caretaker is all sunshine and roses, but it possesses enough advantages for a qualified parenthood. On the other side, opponents are concerned about for the biological clock of each person deciding to be a parent. They hold the opinion that although young people might not be as supportive parents as the elder ones, they are more energetic to keep up with busy children and their everyday challenges. That young individuals are less likely to have problems related to the health, is a given fact needless to point out. therefore, biologically speaking, it is far safer to become a mother or father in younger ages. By way of conclusion, the two sides of the coin are worth to bebeing considered. In other words, both biologically and psychologically the stances are quite significant. There is an ideal time-frame like 30’s of each individual that is a sort of middle-ground between the potential pitfalls and benefits. At any rate, I firmly believe in balanced points of views but if I should choose just one utmost single option, my opinion would be more inclined to the elder older age parenthood in nowadays today’s life.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? Today's world needs to find a solution for the trash which is being produced every day. We dump two billion tons of waste globally each year and we have tried different ways of obliterationmanaging it. Some of them it isare burned, some other are is buried and we also send some of them it to the outer space and leave them it there, But even so, we are still harming nature. The main reasons and measures are discussed in this essay. Since companies and industries are greedy for more money, products are becoming of less quality. Although the technology has progressed and {has} brought new means of manufacturing and producing, the quality and the shelf life of products have been decreased comparing to the past. In addition, surrounded by throwaway materials, we turn almost 99 percent of the products we buy into garbage in less than six months. Ironically, a huge amount of this garbage is used in the packaging of goods, which serves as an advertisement for them. First of all, we should work on materials. Pundits are working hard in labs all over the world in order to invent flexible materials which can be recycled easily. However, thatalthough those materials are currently at exorbitant prices, but in the near future, they will become more reasonable money-wise. Moreover, we can reuse or recycle the current products. For example, using our shopping bags twice and avoiding getting new bags from the store or turning useless water bottles into flowerpots can be an appropriate way to comply get along with this idea. Besides the mentioned measures which can be done, the last but not the least one is raising the public awareness. People should know about this global issue, in order to make better choices when they are shopping and be encouraged to support products with less packaging. Only if the people support this idea and protest against industries and governments, will it be possible for the world to be changed in a good way. All in all, we should understand that there is not enough space on the earth for this massive amount of waste, so we should change our behavior toward the industry, merchandises and governments, in order to make them more environmentally-friendly.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? With escalation the rise inof population on the earth, recycling rubbish is considered a mandatory need of today’s life. Hence, many believe that legislation on in this area is a must to prohibit people from leaving their litter unseparated. Others, however, argue that forcing individuals cannot help and some cultural measures should take the place of the direct laws place. Many citizens say that our environment is in danger since there is not a proper determination of for separating waste at home. As a solution, they think that although some people do it in their apartments, governments should lay down some rules to make all of people to do so. Legislation which prevents them from neglecting to underestimate this potentially threatening matter to natural habitat. Therefore, by implementing some laws, recycling will begins from homes. On the other hand, forcing people to separate household waste by imposing some regulations has many opponents. Groups who oppose this actionthese people believe that not only can this authorities-made measure not solve the recycling issue, but also it may cause some resentments. They are convinced that when governments are act like bulliesbullied like that people tend to resent it and even react oppositelythe opposite, thereby threatening nature. Thus, it seems not to be a rationally reasonable action. They think that governments should implement both some cultural procedures as well as indirect laws in lieu of compelling people. For example, authorities can shape society’s culture by using power of media and advertisements, and also laying down a guideline for schools where students can be made aware of our future that can be threatened by litter. In their opinion, schools have crucial role to play in leading to a city being more tidy, whereas a child is not taught at home about it. Consequently, whilst regulation on areas where cause there is an increase in household waste recycling is a seemingly sensible measure, it should be indirectly to avert some possible bitterness. Therefore, governments can achieve this goal by some effectiverules to reshape the community’s culture and behaviour, and we must remember definitely that it is a long-term target to fulfill.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fat food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax in this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? The Growing industrial economyic, in recent three decades, has been leaving much too many short a time for most of the people cooking healthy foods at home. In addition, dramatically crucial changes in youth’s lifestyle, urge them not to spend time providing nutritious foods. As a result, the only remaining choice is to go for outdoors shops, serving them what has is called fast foods. As the process of their production is not that much visible and due to the pressure of servicing more customers, the output of these shops may not be too muchmuch too healthy, which leads people to face with the catastrophic consequences. To cope with such a condition and to reduce the pain society should tolerate, governments have been making important decisions to increase the total cost of them, despite the fact that solutions related to the price of goods do not necessarily work. If these methods could influence the behavior of the public, why did they did not work for alcohol which has beenwas tested set out many years ago in Mexico to impede youth overconsuming overdozed of it. Having been working as a researcher in the field of economy at university of Toronto, I have recently found that not only could pricing strategies could not solve the problem, but also it may aggravate/intensify it as it negatively influences several economic and social mechanisms. On the other hand, to introduce a technique to support society in dealing with the issue, I would like to emphasize on the role of advertising through the media, on in the way that it creates make incentives for people to select better lifestyles. One other minor factor, that sometimes works is to give some priviledges to those who produce healthy food just like insurance motivations. In conclusion, undoubtedly changed lifestyles have a substantial influence on what people eat that has have some inevitable effects on their health. Governments have been highly adviced advised to concentrate on advertising and some financial supports for healthier foods producers to provide society with more suitable products, leading the public with a healthier life.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

International tourism is now more common than even before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not. What are your opinions in this question? As opposed to the past, over the last decades traveling overseas has become much more popular between among people. Some researchers assert that this phenomenon is beneficial for countries, however, some others assume vice versa. From my point of view, travel makers bring investment to their destinations. In other words, the authorities of the place are which is chosen as a suitable environment for having a leisure time need to provide some convenient facilities such as hotels and shopping centers for travelers that leads them to spend enormous sums of money during their vacations and is economically profitable. What is more, being in touch with different and new cultures and life styles, members of the public can take numerous benefits. For instance, they may establish a friendship with passengers foreigners and become aware of diverse ways of tackling problems in life. Further and even more importantly, through drawing a comparison between their achievements and those of others in the same age but different countries, the young generation will be familiar with their position in the world. It could be a beneficial way to trigger them to be perseveringance and move up the career ladder. On the other hand, some researchers fervently reckon that concentrating on abroad traveling abroad reveals some drawbacks. The case in point is accepting people who live in distant areas with the goal of improving the economicy situation is at the expense of transferring contagious diseases that some of which are were eradicated many years ago. In addition, holiday makers make their destination crowded and disturb the balanced and calm atmosphere of the country. By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position regarding the issue of international tourism. I believe that the governments had better allocate certain amounts of money on to it and draw both cultural and economic benefits.