جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes is banned. Do you agree or disagree? In recent years, overeating is has been one of the main problems in the most of societies. To some experts, the ads play a key role to in creatinge this problem and the authorities should ban the advertising of certain foods like they do cigarettes that is banned. Even though the impact of advertising on people in this issue is undeniable, I believe that there are other factors that people sometimes tend to overeating. On the one hand, some unhealthy foods which are advertised such as fast food, junk food and foods or drinks high in fat persuade young generation to eat more and more. They get familiar with the latest foods through different kinds of advertisement that they are ubiquitous. Therefore, they like to eat these foods rather than healthy foods. As a result, decreasing or banning the ads is a convenient solution for solving this problem. For example, in western countries the advertising of junk food is banned in some mediaum which are special for children in order to help tackleing childhood obesity. On the other hand, people nowadays have an unhealthy lifestyle which leads to obesity that where one of the important factors is related to eating habits. For instance, skipping a meal which is common between teenagers and young people, eating too much pre- packaged foods and much more besides can lead to overeating easily. In addition, watching TV or working while you are eating is quite harmful to our health and might be conducive e to overeating. Furthermore, mental disorders can affect eating habits of people. For example, those who are depressed tend to overeat. According to this, I believe that advertising of some foods does not have direct correlation with overeating.In conclusion, I opine that the advertising of certain food products as much as is useful as well it can be harmful, so it is really depends on to ourselves, our choices and finally about our attitude to live healthy.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that air travel should grow without a limit, while others believe that governments should limit it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Air travel has brought significant changes to our lives in recent years. Although, there remains some disagreements as to whether this mode of travel should increase or not, some strongly opine that governments have to limit traveling by planes. While this essay considers both viewpoints, I personally believe that the benefits of commercial planes outweigh their drawbacks, so there must not be any kind of restrictions on air travels. On the one hand, commercial planes can save passengers's time up to even 50 per cent. Travelers can travel from one continent to another within seven hours, and this is not feasible by any other means of transport. Keeping in mind that air travels are much safer than other ways of travel such as roads, encourages people to select planes than cars or trains. That new demands for chefs, taxi drivers and airport operators to check in passengers is another undeniable advantage that encourages us to travel by air. On the other hand, we do not have to forget about air and noise pollution created by air planes. These gigantic vehicles consume a great deal of fuel, and consequently produce a lot of pollution. That is why airports are located out of urban areas. One of the reasonable claims of those the ones who ask the governments to introduce new laws to limit air flight is the noise and air pollution produced by planes. In addition to this, traveling by planes can be considered risky for people's health. Air pressure and humidity is will change during the flights and frequent flyers will face life threatening problems in long term. By the way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that air travels has a positive impact onf modern life because of its influence on economy.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Physical appearance may play an important role in many spheres of life: in the person's success in school, in relationships with people, in the choice of a career path. Say whether you agree or disagree with it, and if you see it as a positive or negative factor. If we see around ourselves, we would see many successful ones people who, besides their endless efforts, they try to look nice and neat. Although, they may look not very luxuryluxurious, they are very orderly and tidy. I believe that this point can assist them in achieving success and it is extremely effective. The first benefit of being well ordered is that nobody likes sloppy people. It is disgusting for everyone many to communicate with someone who is has poorly dressed bad shapes and clothes. In on many occasions, it is very important to dress properly inwith an official suitcoat and if you wear wore something else, it would be disrespectful to the other party. The other advantage of being in order could be that good-looking people release positive energy to their surrendering environment. It is truly pleasant to be around someone tidy and as a result it can aid in doing every activity better, thereby increasing hence increment of the rate of success. On the other hand, we should not let an attractive appearance fool us. Providing an incredibly handsome appearance is not a hard task while being an honest person is the real challenge in life and we should separate those who are trying to trick us from ethical ones. In conclusion, not only does a fairly neat look help us to be more acceptable in society, but also it would be a positive energy for those around us. However, there are villains who make their best effort to deceive us by their proper appearance and we should be aware of them.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

There are recently been movements to boycott products imported from countries that tolerate the exploitation of underage workers. Using specific examples, explain why you support or oppose such boycott? A new trade trend to boycott imported products which are made by underage workers has been started in today's world. In first world nation countries, the cost of labors for productionproducing activity is overrated, so companies start to invest in developed countries such as Thailand, India, Indonesia, the Philippines and Bangladesh to pay less for production. In these countries the majority of society are under the poverty line and because of mismanagement children are forced to work and provide for their families. Unfortunately, most of these children are underage and work for long hours with low pay. Since it's a fact that big companies like Apple and Nike are famous enough and have worldwidecross world advertisements, hence controlling people not to not buy these products is not possible. Groups of activists believe the more demand there is, the more children work, but I believe individual boycotts does not work and we should go for better solutions to support those children. All the three aspectsparties, that is to say, governments, companies, and families are lie with this issue. First of all, governments of developed countries gain huge profits from investment of big companies. Authorities should make tough rules and put high rate taxes for exporting these products to stop governments. Companies should be under investigation and there should be restrict rules to overcharge companies which invest in these sweatshops. At the same time, governments should put lower rates of importing tax for companies which work with worker-friendly suppliers to motivate companies. I opine, it's incumbentcombat on governments to provide free education and teach families that if these children become literate, they can make more money to help them. In conclusion, child labor is a global issue and all nations must stand against and solve it to make our world a better place for living.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Success in formal "pen and paper" examinations is often seen to be a sign of intelligence.to what extent do you agree with the view that formal examinations measure intelligence? How can students be assessed? Nowadays examination is a common method to recognize people's knowledge in the education system in the whole world. Also, it is a general way for improvement steps by steps. In this essay, we are I will be discussing this issue in more depth which shows whether exams can be a justified reason for being intelligent or not. First, in during a quiz, all candidates will face same types of questions for instance multiple choices or short answer, with the same time and materials for studying. It is not a satisfactory response because some factors such as anxiety, sickness or even sleep disorder have happened, so they may to gain have not giant sufficient Scores. Assessment/evaluation of students The investigation should not be limited devoted to exams only because tests had beencan be memorized or students might cheat cheated by students. for this reason, it is unfair to label knowing them as smart humanity. Furthermore, not only do are the applicants examinedtested, but also they are given the chance to demonstrate their abilities. It is necessary to introduced tests in different parts similar to oral or teamwork and presentation in public and not just written styles. A reason which convinces me to reject this method is that by answering a few some questions, do we understand whether that someone is smart or not? In many aspects, Humans are classified as capable or as weak. In conclusion, students should remember the concepts and explain clearly to others in groups until so that they become ready for exams and then assessment would be fairly. It is better to elaborate each ability in each person and analyze humans according to some common methods. Only then will we will see their motivation and growth instead of their fear against exams.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In western countries, people spend a lot of money on their pets. They buy special food for their cats or dogs, buy them toys and often pay high fees for their medical treatments. Some people think this is a waste of money, and argue that pets are dirty and dangerous. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a pet? Do people spend too much money on pets? Having a pet has become a common trend in many countries these days which has its own pros and cons. In this essay, both sides are discussed. Keeping a pet is more prevailing in western countries where the habit of marriage and forming the family is fading gradually and more people tend to live alone day by day. Lots of individuals prefer to have pets rather than dealing with other humans to fill their loneliness; this way they also satisfy their need of taking care of somebody or looking after someone. Those who have Pets at home always admit this fact that an emotional tie between them and their pet is undeniable. Moreover, sometimes accommodating animals in a warm and safe place benefits pets as well in that they can live in a condition where the food is ready and someone cares about/for them all the time! On the other hand, it could also lead to some negative results. For example, presence of animals inside a home might affect health of the home inhabitants; it has been proven/it is proved that people who keep animals and birds at home are more prone to some specific diseases like asthma or different types of allergies. Financial costs and several headaches of keeping a pet is are another disadvantage which is imposed to on animal owners. They bear almost a huge cost monthly for their food, hygiene and other needs. All in all, I believe although keeping a pet has numerous advantages for people, spending too much money on this purpose is condemned in the a world where many poor people are deprived of even enough little food. Thus, it seems a little rather unjustified/nonsense to expend a lot of resources on making animals happy!

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

In some countries, the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? These days the number of people who are overweight is growing in developed and developing countries. There is a correlation between how much fat we have and our health condition and this relation has been imbalanced in these countries. What have has been disturbed and how can we can fix it? First, today's life intertwines with the sedentary lifestyle. We have to sit and work with computers and it would be difficult to find a job involving physical activities. Moreover, we used to walk or run before invention of automobiles which and it kept us fit and healthy but sadly people these days do not use their foots feet anymore and even employ some personal electric vehicles to transit short distances. Second, humans have access to more food resources than the past owing to modern agriculture and food transportations. Today, we produce tremendous amounts of crops and meats; thanks to technology, they are available and cheaper than the past and we can open the refrigerator's door and eat as much as we can. Now, if we want to tackle this problem, we should modify our lifestyle. Primarily, it is necessary that we stand up and walk again and we need to introduce new methods for working. For instance, there are some new tables designed to working in both standing and siting position that helps us to burn more calories. In addition, it would be practical if we could restrict our calorie intake. Although we have access to rather infiniteive food resources, we should overcome our evolutionary desire asking us to eat as much as we can. In conclusion, modernity have has brought many advantages to human life., however, some of them are unlike our longtime behaviour and it has caused some troubles like obesity and it would seem that humankind should employ their his brains again to ameliorate the situation.