جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some people think that the government should be responsible for crime prevention while others believe that it is responsibility of the individual to protect themselves. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. Although everyone has responsibility to protect themselves himself/herself against of committing crime, the government has a key role in reducing the crime rate. First of all, governments with their suitable rules should pave the way make the pave to have a safe society. For example, all children should have free education. Not only should they continue their education without having financial problems/ hassles of financial, but also the government should support talented students with the grants, scholarships which are have given/awarded them. Another useful/helpful solution that governments could adopt to prevent their society from doing illegal activities is that support/ stand up for one parent familiesy regardless of the reason/ its cause. Because it may be due to individual offenders/ it is possible for guilty of being that person. To put it simply, in such families where that a parent dose is not present/ attend, the environment is available for offence due to lack of enough attention to the child or the meager income is provided because of the loss of a supervisor/ administrator. In spite of governments' role, individuals are required to pay attention to ethics. In this regard, the role of education and training is the most important and it is incumbent upon (their) parents. Parents should teach their children to obey the law in each situation, even if those rules harm them/ to detriment of their freedom. In conclusion, without doubt, laws of governments/ the government regulations are very effective for prevention of crime, but it is does not mean that families can shirk/evade their own responsibility. Not only do parents play a significant role in nurturing their children, but they also help society by disciplining their charges introducing small laws and teaching them their children to respect to any laws lows or rules in their society.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Although more and more people read the news on the internet, newspapers will remain the most important source for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree with that statement? Some people believe that despite the widespread popularity of the online media, traditional newspapers will still hold the most vital position among news readers. In my opinion, due to the accessibility of the internet, not only do people develop a new appreciation in reading news online, but it might lead newspaper companies to be bankrupt. The first thing that attracts people reading news on the online sources is their easy access. With the presence of the internet around almost every corner of the world, people with a portable device such as a mobile phone can access a huge storage of news. In fact, the latest events would be updated immediately on the web. As a result, neither might do traditional newspapers might be able to compete with the internet in terms of the updating speed, nor are people willing to wait in order to get the news the next day. Another benefit with which the internet can, from my point of view, take over the position of newspapers is the new experience it brings to its readers by which. By which I mean, one limitation of newspapers is that it cannot convey visual video messages to the people who read news on a regular basis. Meanwhile, non-stop progress of technology industry has provided people with various online news with voices or even videos attached. For instance, soccer fans these days can re-watch their favorite matches anytime they want with only a digital device connected to the internet, which a newspaper cannot do. In conclusion, although printed newspapers are still more popular than the online news outlet, I definitely disagree that it would continue to remain the most crucial source of information because more and more people will be drawn to usinge the internet.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? Today, learning a foreign language has plays a key role in education systems. Many schools even have started to teach different types of foreign languages at the same time in primary schools. Meanwhile, some educationalists are disagree with this respect/trend. A large number of educationalists claim that coping with a learning foreign language at an early age has added benefits and if you miss the chance at this stage you should practice harder as you grow older to reach the intended target. It is said that a much higher proportion of students who have begun learning another language at primary schools have become more interested in acquisition of a language learning. Moreover, research has highlighted that mental development of students during primary schools have has considerable progress rather than in secondary schools but having said that many believe teaching educating much information to primary students may get them bored or put push lots of pressure on them, inasmuch as children at this point need more time playing around and also exploring the outside world besides having fun with the other pupils. All in all, I, personally, believe that it would be great to provide such a situation for students where that they could learn new skills in order to create an enjoyable environment. By that I mean not only should we start to teach children from primary schools, but we also should develop a condition in which children feel thoroughly enthusiastic instead of bored.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. some people think that the closure of local businesses will bring about the death of local communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree. It is an undeniable issue that advertisements play a vital role in expanding their newly founded companies. Therefore, it is an undeniable fact that people’s life styles have changed recently. For instance, most of individuals who follow a hectic life style prefer to buy their needs through modern shopping centers instead of spending huge amounts of time on going to local shops. however, elderly spouses prefer to go to some small shops which are familiar to them and talk to owners or consult with them and then buy their needs. These modern shopping centers that have been established these days included a variety kinds of items/goods/merchandise/products/things, hence there is a wider range of choices to buy. In addition, they offer some special discounts to some of their goods on sale sail things and it could encourage consumption motivate the member of public to consume. The other Other notable issue things to bring up is associated with the power of purchasing power buying. Owners of these shopping places can easily buy enormous amounts/quantities of qualified products because . Because they are rich and that might be a major reason to attract consumers based on their guides. Despite Although the afore mentioned possible reasons to make hypermarkets appealing, there are some proponents opponents who assert that we should not forget the fact in our society that one third of the inhabitants are senior citizens /overaged and have a traditional life. They are fond of buying their things in some small shops near their living places. They claim not only do crowded malls provide some pricy things but also it is not a suitable idea to waste money on some colorful well-packaged products. On the whole, from my point of view popularity of some shops that are small and just sail sell limited things is on the decline and I, personally, wholeheartedly agree with the given statement.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Paying teachers based on their students’ successes can be an interesting issue to debate. We can explore in this subject from in two points of views, one of which them is students’ opinion and the another is teachers’ opinion in this regard. I agree with this issue up to a point and I find it hard to believe that it can be utilized in every case. For instance, when a student doesn't try to learn or doesn't have enough intelligence or motivation for learning and all of these things make it hard for teachers to see improvement of their students to an acceptable extent and it will be caused financial detriment for them in such cases. On the contrary, when a student is hardworking and talented maybe he can make a good progress and achieve big success even in the presence of a mediocre teacher, so in these circumstances maybe teachers do not esn't deserve to be paid much money. Besides, what I said about how much controversy can be existed when we want to perform this deed, I would like to express the virtual advantages that can accompany with this topic. When the amount of money that a teachers earns be depends on his students' success absolutely the teacher try tries to do his best and in general it can lead to innovation in teaching methods and changinge the structure of the educational system from recession to a hectic environment. In conclusion, as a student I agree with this issue but we shouldn't ignore this matter can be obscure in some aspects.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

University lecturers are now able to put their lectures on the internet for students to read and so the importance of attending face to face lectures has been reduced. Do you believe the use of the internet in formal education is a good idea? Nowadays, Now day many universities have this ability able to put their information and lectures on the internet for reading and it is if so prominent that our life style has been changed by it. People today still have mixed views on whether it is good or has have negative influence on the future of educationacademy. In my opinion, there are more pluses pulses than drawbacks. The internet is a small world village where that all of people in all around the world have an interaction with each other them and also it is a best situation where that we can share our knowledge or use new information via the internet , because of this when you don not spend your time in university and use virtual access, it is so important since you can save your time for doing and traveling with less without any traffic in addition , you have enough time to pass through the internet and do researching for articles instead of going out. In fact if you find the best way in order to research and learn anything by internet, it would be a valuable source of information. Some people argue that the internet, reduces communication between people without any emotional scenes and interaction. Here, I am referring to some examples: when you spend your time learning instead of attending to class, it causes you not to that you do not have a desirable situation for communication with other people face to face action. When you have enough time with other people, they can give you positive energy and also resolve any your any problem of yours, yet the real communication via the virtual world is impaired and diminishes our sensitive behavior. Taking everything into consideration, in spite of many benefits/advantages/merits proficiency that the internet provides for us, such as: easy accessibility of le information around the world without any border restrictions in board-sharing knowledge. Major factors which we should accept it in or life are is like: interaction-emotional-face to face communication are is reduced. Totally, you should integrate both technology and humanity in your life.

جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.

Task: People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons ( for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc). why do you think people attend colleges or uinversites. Nowadays, the majority of individuals are eager to continue their education either at universities or colleges. There are numerous underlying reasons, from my perspective, some of which will be discussed here. First and foremost, attending universities paves the way for people to have a decent life in the future, inasmuch as not only are there high demands for well-read individuals in the market, but also society has a positive attitude toward educated people, so the aforementioned individuals have both a decent job and the a chance to get married to with the upper class of society. The more education, the more golden opportunities. Moreover, many experts claim that most of the individuals continue their learning to hone their both social and practical skills which enables make them be able to settle their daily issues. Simply put, the majority of educated people are capable of to repairing their appliances as well as being able to interact with their relatives and friends in a sociable approach when they are confronted with social or personal problems. Last but not least, I believe that some people continue their education in order to be independent and also broaden their horizons. In other words, continuing studies gives them the a chance to of leaveing families and stand on their own feet. Furthermore, they can develop their relations, understand the real world where they will be faced with problems and resolve their issues without the help of their parents. In conclusion, my personal conviction is that going to universities is a psychological demand by which people can regulate their behaviors and lifestyles as well.