Fridays GMAT-GRE-TOEFL-IELTS-آموزشگاه زبان صبای سحر-چمران جنوب، بلوار جلال آل احمد، جنب داروخانه شبانه روزی جلال آل احمد، پلاک 87، طبقه سوم تلفن: 42-88679341 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/154-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-24 2024-05-04T03:45:28+00:00 IELTSTOEFLCENTER info@ieltstoeflcenter.com Joomla! - Open Source Content Management You Need to Travel from Your Home to a Place 40 Miles 106, Ayda Pourimani 2016-05-13T19:05:29+00:00 2016-05-13T19:05:29+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/154-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-24/770-you-need-to-travel-from-your-home-to-a-place-40-miles-106-ayda-pourimani <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/You Need to Travel from Your Home to a Place 40 Miles 106, Ayda Pourimani.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">You need to travel from your home to a place 40 miles away. Compare the different kinds of transportation you could use. We have different journeys with different experience about casual short or long travel during of our lives. One of the main concerns all of us have is which kind of transportation we could choose. We have different kinds of transportation such as public transportation, private car and bike. I strongly believe that the best option for travel is public transportation after that the bike and finally the private car. The First and foremost reason for the choice of public transportation such as planes, buses and trains is that it is not only the best and safest kind of transportation, but also it is time and moneysaving your time, (and) money. When you compare public transportation with other kinds, you have the opportunity to make new friends during of travel or read books, eat something, talk with your friend, play a game in your notebook and also enjoy the sight out. On the other hand, when you compare that with other kinds of transportation such as private cars and bikes you don’t have any fear afraid of losing control or even focus when you drive. Moreover, more over public transportation has have highly detailed and varied timetables program (schedule). Today the benefit (advantage) of mobility, daily physical activity is no not secret to for anybody. In my opinion travelling by bike is a very attractive and helps you to have strong strength muscles, get in shape, have more healthy environment and also it's very cheap, but it is extremely time consuming. It is prefect for travelling when you don’t have any limited for time. My last choice for travelling is taking a private car. it is too so expensive because you must pay for car fuel, parking. Although Despite you have privacy and it is the most dependable way to travel, when using car, (have) involves high risk of accident and increases of air pollution. In a nutshell, I personally believe that the best way for travelling is public transportation because it’s easy and comfortable.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/You Need to Travel from Your Home to a Place 40 Miles 106, Ayda Pourimani.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">You need to travel from your home to a place 40 miles away. Compare the different kinds of transportation you could use. We have different journeys with different experience about casual short or long travel during of our lives. One of the main concerns all of us have is which kind of transportation we could choose. We have different kinds of transportation such as public transportation, private car and bike. I strongly believe that the best option for travel is public transportation after that the bike and finally the private car. The First and foremost reason for the choice of public transportation such as planes, buses and trains is that it is not only the best and safest kind of transportation, but also it is time and moneysaving your time, (and) money. When you compare public transportation with other kinds, you have the opportunity to make new friends during of travel or read books, eat something, talk with your friend, play a game in your notebook and also enjoy the sight out. On the other hand, when you compare that with other kinds of transportation such as private cars and bikes you don’t have any fear afraid of losing control or even focus when you drive. Moreover, more over public transportation has have highly detailed and varied timetables program (schedule). Today the benefit (advantage) of mobility, daily physical activity is no not secret to for anybody. In my opinion travelling by bike is a very attractive and helps you to have strong strength muscles, get in shape, have more healthy environment and also it's very cheap, but it is extremely time consuming. It is prefect for travelling when you don’t have any limited for time. My last choice for travelling is taking a private car. it is too so expensive because you must pay for car fuel, parking. Although Despite you have privacy and it is the most dependable way to travel, when using car, (have) involves high risk of accident and increases of air pollution. In a nutshell, I personally believe that the best way for travelling is public transportation because it’s easy and comfortable.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Waste Legalizing, Nassim Omidi 2016-05-13T19:05:04+00:00 2016-05-13T19:05:04+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/154-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-24/769-waste-legalizing-nassim-omidi <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/Waste Legalizing, Nassim Omidi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way for increasing recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed for people to recycle more of their waste? Converting wastes and making them as potentially useful materials is one of the most crucial issues in this era because if we fail to do it, not doing it, devastating impacts are irreversible and insurmountable, not only do in environmentally, perspective, but also economically. in economic one. Although this issue is mostly studied studies from an in industrial aspects, some, myself included, believe that home waste recycling process is long term/chronic. Hence, the best way is to legalizing it. Today, thanks to technology, we could reuse almost every material in a variety of ways. By Changing their appearances or analyzing the ingredients, we can use using them for producing completely different objects, so it is clear that there will be more economic benefits. Meanwhile, mine while the extended expended horizon highlights more serious impacts, which are environmental ones. The less ingredient production, the more energy saving. Air pollution from incineration and contaminated water from land filling landfills are cited citing as other causes of not recycling, which will be capital‐ intensive. Hence, it is crucial to spread/extend enhance it to all parts of society, that is in that legalizing home recycling for some reasons. Firstly, consisting introducing laws, the whole society will cooperate in a project, so assurance of being in a same way exists. It is worth mentioning that, according to statistics, without laws the results will not be as much reliable as they are supposed to be. Secondly, scientific and statistical researches could be held more practically for paving the way of improvements of the waste hierarchy, which includes reducereduction, reuse and recyclinge. All in all, using waste conversion laws converting waste law is the key component of modern waste reduction and including homes in to this law will be helpful in recycling biodegradable wastes apart from its social and environmental aspects. Although we cannot it is not expected to a sudden change in people’s habits any time soon, we can be hopeful that it will happen with time. quickly after assenting. 280 words</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/Waste Legalizing, Nassim Omidi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way for increasing recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed for people to recycle more of their waste? Converting wastes and making them as potentially useful materials is one of the most crucial issues in this era because if we fail to do it, not doing it, devastating impacts are irreversible and insurmountable, not only do in environmentally, perspective, but also economically. in economic one. Although this issue is mostly studied studies from an in industrial aspects, some, myself included, believe that home waste recycling process is long term/chronic. Hence, the best way is to legalizing it. Today, thanks to technology, we could reuse almost every material in a variety of ways. By Changing their appearances or analyzing the ingredients, we can use using them for producing completely different objects, so it is clear that there will be more economic benefits. Meanwhile, mine while the extended expended horizon highlights more serious impacts, which are environmental ones. The less ingredient production, the more energy saving. Air pollution from incineration and contaminated water from land filling landfills are cited citing as other causes of not recycling, which will be capital‐ intensive. Hence, it is crucial to spread/extend enhance it to all parts of society, that is in that legalizing home recycling for some reasons. Firstly, consisting introducing laws, the whole society will cooperate in a project, so assurance of being in a same way exists. It is worth mentioning that, according to statistics, without laws the results will not be as much reliable as they are supposed to be. Secondly, scientific and statistical researches could be held more practically for paving the way of improvements of the waste hierarchy, which includes reducereduction, reuse and recyclinge. All in all, using waste conversion laws converting waste law is the key component of modern waste reduction and including homes in to this law will be helpful in recycling biodegradable wastes apart from its social and environmental aspects. Although we cannot it is not expected to a sudden change in people’s habits any time soon, we can be hopeful that it will happen with time. quickly after assenting. 280 words</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Vahid Ghobadi 2016-05-13T19:04:30+00:00 2016-05-13T19:04:30+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/154-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-24/768-vahid-ghobadi <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/Vahid Ghobadi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think that teenager years are the happiest times of most of people's lives, while others believe that adults' life brings more happiness, in spite of greater responsibilities. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Is happiness related to financially independent, job or responsibilities? Do people who are sad and hopeless cite maturity as momentous aspect? In every period of life we live in a special situation .Although very tremendous excitements of learning and carrying out new skills and new experiments, not responsibilities and pure friendship make teenagers happiness , blurry future can influence their emotions. For instance, what will they do for their living? What really happensed to them if their parents pass away ? And many other questions with unclear answers. Unlike teenagers, most adults aren't enthusiastic to carry out new experiments .Occupation and gaining money are pleasant enough to them. More coworkers and colleagues, less fewer close friends are is the outcome of financial independence .Not only can a monotonous life can exhaust them, but also can reduce their happiness and satisfying satisfaction. However, there aren't many unanswered questions and unclear future too. In conclusion, happiness is more related to mentality than age .Many times we face in newspapers and media the teenagers committing suicide and an elderly winning a running competition. It's up to us to on our own live a happy life happiness life or pick a sad one.sadness one.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/Vahid Ghobadi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people think that teenager years are the happiest times of most of people's lives, while others believe that adults' life brings more happiness, in spite of greater responsibilities. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Is happiness related to financially independent, job or responsibilities? Do people who are sad and hopeless cite maturity as momentous aspect? In every period of life we live in a special situation .Although very tremendous excitements of learning and carrying out new skills and new experiments, not responsibilities and pure friendship make teenagers happiness , blurry future can influence their emotions. For instance, what will they do for their living? What really happensed to them if their parents pass away ? And many other questions with unclear answers. Unlike teenagers, most adults aren't enthusiastic to carry out new experiments .Occupation and gaining money are pleasant enough to them. More coworkers and colleagues, less fewer close friends are is the outcome of financial independence .Not only can a monotonous life can exhaust them, but also can reduce their happiness and satisfying satisfaction. However, there aren't many unanswered questions and unclear future too. In conclusion, happiness is more related to mentality than age .Many times we face in newspapers and media the teenagers committing suicide and an elderly winning a running competition. It's up to us to on our own live a happy life happiness life or pick a sad one.sadness one.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Some Parents But their Children a Large Amount of Toys to Play With, Sarang Rose 2016-05-13T19:04:04+00:00 2016-05-13T19:04:04+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/154-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-24/767-some-parents-but-their-children-a-large-amount-of-toys-to-play-with-sarang-rose <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/Some Parents But their Children a Large Amount of Toys to Play With, Sarang Rose.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Task: some parents buy their children a large amount of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys? Nowadays, there are many plaything producers around the world, hence the number of toys in shops and houses is are increasing dramatically. While some people are in favor of purchasing multiple toys for kids, others believe that it will have many drawbacks. Both sides have their reasons that some of which will be discussed in this essay. Firstly, some claim that the best time to develop a person's skills is during his or her childhood and toys play a vital role in this regard. They believe that playing with a plaything will hone a child's skill such as practical and language talent. On the other hand, they assert that being busy with toys will develop both color recognition and hand‐eye coordination skills. In other words, the more toys, the more developed abilities. Secondly, others believe that having multiple toys has have many disadvantages that outweigh its advantages. At first, purchasing many much playthings will spoil children and will have adverse effects because children believe that they can obtain everything in their future life without any difficulties. In addition, and on the social side it can develop discrimination among wealthy and poor families children and frustrated lower levels of society, so psychologists claim that positive influence of toys will be paled by purchasing toys lavishly. In conclusion, I strongly believe that the best approach is to have everything in moderation and toys are no not exception. Simply put, (In other words,) we should buy playthings not only as an entertainment, but also to improve/hone children's skills, otherwise toys can be a threat for them as well as /and society.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/Some Parents But their Children a Large Amount of Toys to Play With, Sarang Rose.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Task: some parents buy their children a large amount of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys? Nowadays, there are many plaything producers around the world, hence the number of toys in shops and houses is are increasing dramatically. While some people are in favor of purchasing multiple toys for kids, others believe that it will have many drawbacks. Both sides have their reasons that some of which will be discussed in this essay. Firstly, some claim that the best time to develop a person's skills is during his or her childhood and toys play a vital role in this regard. They believe that playing with a plaything will hone a child's skill such as practical and language talent. On the other hand, they assert that being busy with toys will develop both color recognition and hand‐eye coordination skills. In other words, the more toys, the more developed abilities. Secondly, others believe that having multiple toys has have many disadvantages that outweigh its advantages. At first, purchasing many much playthings will spoil children and will have adverse effects because children believe that they can obtain everything in their future life without any difficulties. In addition, and on the social side it can develop discrimination among wealthy and poor families children and frustrated lower levels of society, so psychologists claim that positive influence of toys will be paled by purchasing toys lavishly. In conclusion, I strongly believe that the best approach is to have everything in moderation and toys are no not exception. Simply put, (In other words,) we should buy playthings not only as an entertainment, but also to improve/hone children's skills, otherwise toys can be a threat for them as well as /and society.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Scoring, Nassim 2016-05-13T19:02:23+00:00 2016-05-13T19:02:23+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/154-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-24/766-scoring-nassim <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/Scoring, Nassim.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">70. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Grades encourage students to learn. Disagree: 1‐ some alternatives baseline like cooperate with other students, experiment, With the progress of teaching systems and performing numerous psychological tests this topic has been raised as to that whether appraising quantity and quality of learning by scoring systems in diverse curriculums can be a productive means or not? I myself disagree with this conventional measure. First and foremost, the aim of teaching and learning procedure is far beyond exclusively learning some definite subjects and evaluate students’ knowledge by scoring different exams. On the other hand, teachers should inspire students to keep abreast of the most recent inventions. Furthermore, students should be encouraged to persevere pursue their innovative ideas. I believe that not only does giving grades not encourage pupils to learn more diverse related topics, rather it restricts their creativity and sense of adventure. Take learning science as an example. Strange though it seems, I maintain that the mentioned method dissuades students from continuing to continue their scientific ambitions and performing various experiments to continue ideas that sparkles to their mind. Secondly, contemporary teaching experts have concluded that there are some alternative baselines for evaluation of students’ knowledge. As an example, teachers can divide students into teams and award the most successful group in replication of a scientific discovery or being successful in devising novel methods in different scopes. In addition, scoring systems eliminate a sense of cooperation and cause collaboration to pale into insignificance. Being Successful in getting higher scores, students can be condescendinged to their peers. And last but not least, what can be more important than the pleasure of the learning process? Giving grades to exams quantify everything and may ignore its quality. Moreover, students are compelled to recite contents of their books and pamphlets without assimilating them. In my opinion, giving grades means the higher score you get, the more intelligent students you are but in my opinion and this is a fallacy. To put it in a nutshell, were I to choose between the options, I would vote against this sentence that grades can motivate students to learn more.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/Scoring, Nassim.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">70. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Grades encourage students to learn. Disagree: 1‐ some alternatives baseline like cooperate with other students, experiment, With the progress of teaching systems and performing numerous psychological tests this topic has been raised as to that whether appraising quantity and quality of learning by scoring systems in diverse curriculums can be a productive means or not? I myself disagree with this conventional measure. First and foremost, the aim of teaching and learning procedure is far beyond exclusively learning some definite subjects and evaluate students’ knowledge by scoring different exams. On the other hand, teachers should inspire students to keep abreast of the most recent inventions. Furthermore, students should be encouraged to persevere pursue their innovative ideas. I believe that not only does giving grades not encourage pupils to learn more diverse related topics, rather it restricts their creativity and sense of adventure. Take learning science as an example. Strange though it seems, I maintain that the mentioned method dissuades students from continuing to continue their scientific ambitions and performing various experiments to continue ideas that sparkles to their mind. Secondly, contemporary teaching experts have concluded that there are some alternative baselines for evaluation of students’ knowledge. As an example, teachers can divide students into teams and award the most successful group in replication of a scientific discovery or being successful in devising novel methods in different scopes. In addition, scoring systems eliminate a sense of cooperation and cause collaboration to pale into insignificance. Being Successful in getting higher scores, students can be condescendinged to their peers. And last but not least, what can be more important than the pleasure of the learning process? Giving grades to exams quantify everything and may ignore its quality. Moreover, students are compelled to recite contents of their books and pamphlets without assimilating them. In my opinion, giving grades means the higher score you get, the more intelligent students you are but in my opinion and this is a fallacy. To put it in a nutshell, were I to choose between the options, I would vote against this sentence that grades can motivate students to learn more.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Learning a Foreign Language, Jalal Asghari 2016-05-13T19:01:58+00:00 2016-05-13T19:01:58+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/154-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-24/765-learning-a-foreign-language-jalal-asghari <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/Learning a Foreign Language, Jalal Asghari.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? Some experts believe that teaching a foreign language to children in early years of school is more effective and they will acquire better consequences than when they start to learn at secondary school. Basically, children learn better in early years and they have more time to learn in this case if parents know how to teach them. Although scientists have not been able to reach any firm evidence concerning the existence of a specific learning age, there are some reasons that early learners of a foreign language are able to learn faster and easier. First of all, Children at primary school are more enthusiastic to explore and find new things and this ability of learning and imitation which help them to pick up a the new language better than those in an upper‐ class in school. Second, because of unlimited capacity of humans’ brain to learn especially during the first few years there is no limitation for a to child to learn multiple languages in lower stages. Furthermore, learning by the right hemisphere right brain which is more imaginative and faster than the left brain or logical one is less anxiously and more attractively. In additional, children in primary levels have fewer less physical and psychological issues and learn differently if parents and schools have efficient information about methods needed to teach them and provide an attractive learning condition. Some argue that bombing children at early years leads them to a type of confusion and not only can they cannot learn a the foreign one properly, but also will they will have problems with their maternal language. This type of teaching is a very sensitive issue and schools should have trained teachers in this context, and using language experts with no experience in primary schools or teaching children might reduce the attraction of learning for to children and backfire.reverse the consequent. Consequently, if we start to teach learn a foreign language to our children from early years they will be an early bird in this issue and will acquire proper results, but it needs special conditions and teachers and it’s a start of teaching. Word count = 341</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/Learning a Foreign Language, Jalal Asghari.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? Some experts believe that teaching a foreign language to children in early years of school is more effective and they will acquire better consequences than when they start to learn at secondary school. Basically, children learn better in early years and they have more time to learn in this case if parents know how to teach them. Although scientists have not been able to reach any firm evidence concerning the existence of a specific learning age, there are some reasons that early learners of a foreign language are able to learn faster and easier. First of all, Children at primary school are more enthusiastic to explore and find new things and this ability of learning and imitation which help them to pick up a the new language better than those in an upper‐ class in school. Second, because of unlimited capacity of humans’ brain to learn especially during the first few years there is no limitation for a to child to learn multiple languages in lower stages. Furthermore, learning by the right hemisphere right brain which is more imaginative and faster than the left brain or logical one is less anxiously and more attractively. In additional, children in primary levels have fewer less physical and psychological issues and learn differently if parents and schools have efficient information about methods needed to teach them and provide an attractive learning condition. Some argue that bombing children at early years leads them to a type of confusion and not only can they cannot learn a the foreign one properly, but also will they will have problems with their maternal language. This type of teaching is a very sensitive issue and schools should have trained teachers in this context, and using language experts with no experience in primary schools or teaching children might reduce the attraction of learning for to children and backfire.reverse the consequent. Consequently, if we start to teach learn a foreign language to our children from early years they will be an early bird in this issue and will acquire proper results, but it needs special conditions and teachers and it’s a start of teaching. Word count = 341</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Increasing the Price of Petrol, Nasrin Moravaj 2016-05-13T19:01:31+00:00 2016-05-13T19:01:31+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/154-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-24/764-increasing-the-price-of-petrol-nasrin-moravaj <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/Increasing the Price of Petrol, Nasrin Moravaj.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? Over the last two decades there has been a massive increase in the number of vehicles on the road. It can be attributed to the purchasing buying power of people undoubtedly. This trend has led to traffic problems and pollution in big cities. A group of people believes that the best way to solve such problems traffic problems and pollution is to increase fuel prices. I actually don’t agree with this idea beacause. Insomuch we should contemplate/bear in mind the ripple effect of this decision. Increasinge the price of petrol causes people to think twice before using their personal vehicles, but this price hike could effects affect on basic requirement for transportation. Any hike in the price of petrol can cause an the overall inflation. It brings hardship in daily commuters. Such trends result in skewed supply chain relationship of petrol as a commodity. There are also alternatives that the government could explore to curb pollution and traffic in big cities. For this propose, the government could decentralize urban areas and develop small cities. Moreover, developing the infrastructure by constructing flyovers and alternate routes is a viable alternative. The government can also develop a metro rail network connecting key hubs. In addition, modifying school timings could be another procedure for having a further ease. All this can reduce traffic congestion and pollution obstacle at the same time. To summarize, infrastructures development could be planned and implemented with the future vehicle number growth. Infrastructure developments will also go a long way in improving the overall economy in the country. 1. Reading 1 article 2. Take a note and memorize the word 3. Write About 4 hours totally</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/Increasing the Price of Petrol, Nasrin Moravaj.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? Over the last two decades there has been a massive increase in the number of vehicles on the road. It can be attributed to the purchasing buying power of people undoubtedly. This trend has led to traffic problems and pollution in big cities. A group of people believes that the best way to solve such problems traffic problems and pollution is to increase fuel prices. I actually don’t agree with this idea beacause. Insomuch we should contemplate/bear in mind the ripple effect of this decision. Increasinge the price of petrol causes people to think twice before using their personal vehicles, but this price hike could effects affect on basic requirement for transportation. Any hike in the price of petrol can cause an the overall inflation. It brings hardship in daily commuters. Such trends result in skewed supply chain relationship of petrol as a commodity. There are also alternatives that the government could explore to curb pollution and traffic in big cities. For this propose, the government could decentralize urban areas and develop small cities. Moreover, developing the infrastructure by constructing flyovers and alternate routes is a viable alternative. The government can also develop a metro rail network connecting key hubs. In addition, modifying school timings could be another procedure for having a further ease. All this can reduce traffic congestion and pollution obstacle at the same time. To summarize, infrastructures development could be planned and implemented with the future vehicle number growth. Infrastructure developments will also go a long way in improving the overall economy in the country. 1. Reading 1 article 2. Take a note and memorize the word 3. Write About 4 hours totally</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Fossil Fuels, Majid Talebzadeh 2016-05-13T19:01:08+00:00 2016-05-13T19:01:08+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/154-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-24/763-fossil-fuels-majid-talebzadeh <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/Fossil Fuels, Majid Talebzadeh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Global warming as one of the most important challenges, nowadays, has compelled authorities to be concerned about the ozone layer depletion damage(s). Obviously fossil fuels as a main cause of this problem, should be replaced with green energies. It is obvious that global warming will destroy the environment for future generations. Fossil fuels consumption more and more producesd Carbone dioxide in the ozone layer. Thus, due to damages to damaging this protection/ive layer, harmful radiation shines directly on humans' and animals’s body and causes deceases like skin cancer. Furthermore, fossil fuels not only exert/have do detrimental effects of pollution, but also will come to an end in future. So it is extremely necessary demanded that it should be replaced by new sources of energy. For the During last decades, scientists have been attemptinged to explore energy sources more green and lower less prices than fossil fuels. Fortunately modern technology assists them in finding to find explore new facilities for controlling natural clean energy sources like wind power, solar, geothermal. For instance, we can cite the geothermal as a natural permanent economical source for clean energy, but owing to limited reservoirs, naturally it is available just for a few countries, for as example Canada, Iran, the United States, Australia and Switzerland. On the other hand, it is undeniable fact that fossil energies like crude oil and methane are easy to transport through pipeline, shipment and vehicle, additionally, they are immortal perishable and simply to storeage in underground and storage steel tanks wherever we like. However, green sources usually are not portable and available for storage for a long time. So in conclusion, it is obvious that due to development of green energy sources and environmental damages by fossil fuels, authorities are forced to alternate these kinds of energies although . However, fossil sources are easy and economical to access.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/Fossil Fuels, Majid Talebzadeh.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Global warming as one of the most important challenges, nowadays, has compelled authorities to be concerned about the ozone layer depletion damage(s). Obviously fossil fuels as a main cause of this problem, should be replaced with green energies. It is obvious that global warming will destroy the environment for future generations. Fossil fuels consumption more and more producesd Carbone dioxide in the ozone layer. Thus, due to damages to damaging this protection/ive layer, harmful radiation shines directly on humans' and animals’s body and causes deceases like skin cancer. Furthermore, fossil fuels not only exert/have do detrimental effects of pollution, but also will come to an end in future. So it is extremely necessary demanded that it should be replaced by new sources of energy. For the During last decades, scientists have been attemptinged to explore energy sources more green and lower less prices than fossil fuels. Fortunately modern technology assists them in finding to find explore new facilities for controlling natural clean energy sources like wind power, solar, geothermal. For instance, we can cite the geothermal as a natural permanent economical source for clean energy, but owing to limited reservoirs, naturally it is available just for a few countries, for as example Canada, Iran, the United States, Australia and Switzerland. On the other hand, it is undeniable fact that fossil energies like crude oil and methane are easy to transport through pipeline, shipment and vehicle, additionally, they are immortal perishable and simply to storeage in underground and storage steel tanks wherever we like. However, green sources usually are not portable and available for storage for a long time. So in conclusion, it is obvious that due to development of green energy sources and environmental damages by fossil fuels, authorities are forced to alternate these kinds of energies although . However, fossil sources are easy and economical to access.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Extracurricular Activities of Students, Hosein Talebi 2016-05-13T19:00:36+00:00 2016-05-13T19:00:36+00:00 https://www.sabaitc.com/index.php/workshop-speaking-writing/writing-workshop/2015-10-31-06-09-31/154-fridays-writing-workshop-1395/writing-workshop-friday-95-02-24/762-extracurricular-activities-of-students-hosein-talebi <p> </p> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/Extracurricular Activities of Students, Hosein Talebi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people believe that children should go to extra classes after school. Others, however, think that children should spend that time playing instead. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. The necessity of developing holding/providing extracurricular educational classes and terms for pupils versus preparing them time for playing and having fun with their peers has been always a controversial issue. Many people, especially older generations, believe that perfect learning is a result of prolonged exposure,. Therefore, planning supportive classes for children would result in magnificent conceptual learning achievements. Furthermore, as our kids grow up, they can find glamorous entertainments around themselves which can distract them in the way of reaching their parents’ and teachers’ pedagogical targets. Besides, these kinds of activities preserve children from wasting their time by worthless and useless games which have has not any instructional value. On the other hand, opponents claim that pupils need games and fun as well as lessons and books. In fact, while they are growing up, the proportion of educational activities in their free times should be kept to a minimum, and most of this extra time should be dedicated to playing with friends. From their viewpoint, these years are the pupil’s golden age which will never come back or repeat,. Therefore, they must use their childhood to have fun as a child and when they grow up, their adolescence will thrive. Besides, there are many lessons from life embedded in babyhood plays. In my opinion, parents should strike a balance between the age of their children and the type of activities they have after school, meaning that as they are passing their primary school, the rate of their physical and pleasant activeness might be at the highest values toward mental activities and boring lessons, and after that when they reached high school this ratio should be reversed and at last the proportion of school correlated courses and supportive extra classes should reach a maximum. In a nutshell, there is not a single constant solution for every period of a pupil’s pedagogic life time although parents and teachers could survey every child’s field of interest fields and present a specific personal plan for everyone according to their involvements, whereas most of the seniors prefer to use the traditional manner of bombarding students with extra educational classes after the school time especially when it comes to high schools and when university entrance exams are getting closer.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <table border="1" width="80%" align="center"> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p dir="rtl" align="center"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: medium;">جهت مشاهده Writing تصحیح شده فایل PDF را دانلود نمایید.</span></p> <p align="center"><a href="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Workshop/Wirting/Fridays/1395/Writing Workshop Friday 95.02.24/Extracurricular Activities of Students, Hosein Talebi.pdf"><img src="http://ieltstoeflcenter.com/Download/Download-Button.png" alt="" /></a></p> <p dir="ltr" align="left">Some people believe that children should go to extra classes after school. Others, however, think that children should spend that time playing instead. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. The necessity of developing holding/providing extracurricular educational classes and terms for pupils versus preparing them time for playing and having fun with their peers has been always a controversial issue. Many people, especially older generations, believe that perfect learning is a result of prolonged exposure,. Therefore, planning supportive classes for children would result in magnificent conceptual learning achievements. Furthermore, as our kids grow up, they can find glamorous entertainments around themselves which can distract them in the way of reaching their parents’ and teachers’ pedagogical targets. Besides, these kinds of activities preserve children from wasting their time by worthless and useless games which have has not any instructional value. On the other hand, opponents claim that pupils need games and fun as well as lessons and books. In fact, while they are growing up, the proportion of educational activities in their free times should be kept to a minimum, and most of this extra time should be dedicated to playing with friends. From their viewpoint, these years are the pupil’s golden age which will never come back or repeat,. Therefore, they must use their childhood to have fun as a child and when they grow up, their adolescence will thrive. Besides, there are many lessons from life embedded in babyhood plays. In my opinion, parents should strike a balance between the age of their children and the type of activities they have after school, meaning that as they are passing their primary school, the rate of their physical and pleasant activeness might be at the highest values toward mental activities and boring lessons, and after that when they reached high school this ratio should be reversed and at last the proportion of school correlated courses and supportive extra classes should reach a maximum. In a nutshell, there is not a single constant solution for every period of a pupil’s pedagogic life time although parents and teachers could survey every child’s field of interest fields and present a specific personal plan for everyone according to their involvements, whereas most of the seniors prefer to use the traditional manner of bombarding students with extra educational classes after the school time especially when it comes to high schools and when university entrance exams are getting closer.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>